RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Socioeconomic Factors<br />
Management. There are significant managerial differences<br />
in the dryland farming villages of India.<br />
Farmers born in traditional farming households and<br />
farmers who receive hands-on farming training<br />
proved to be better managers.<br />
Farm prices. The cost of inputs, particularly fertilizer<br />
and labor, have increased sharply in recent<br />
years, but prices for farm produce have not kept up.<br />
Fertilizer prices increased by 60% from 1980-81 to<br />
1981-82. While large and efficient farmers can<br />
rapidly adjust to fluctuations, the small farmers are<br />
caught. Farm prices should be tied to industrial<br />
prices.<br />
Credit and insurance. Farmers may not necessarily<br />
strive to maximize yields, particularly in a subsistence<br />
economy based on diversified farming.<br />
Small and marginal farmers do not have the ability<br />
to mobilize resources and cannot afford to take<br />
risks. For example, next to improved seed, fertilizer<br />
brings about the most visible changes in productivity.<br />
Large farmers readily adopt recommended practices,<br />
but even though small and marginal farmers<br />
are convinced of the utility of fertilizer application,<br />
they do not fully adopt the recommended levels<br />
because of the financial risk. Farmers are sensitive to<br />
price increases, lack of credit, and should be provided<br />
with cheap credit covered by insurance to<br />
insulate against bad weather.<br />
Transport. Small and marginal farmers have limited<br />
marketable surpluses, and middlemen are the ultimate<br />
beneficiaries if the produce is taken to regulated<br />
markets.<br />
Rural warehouses. It is necessary to develop a<br />
network of rural godowns (warehouses) to stockpile<br />
surplus production, and provide credit or advance<br />
payment that would partly ease the financial limitations<br />
of small and marginal farmers (Dwarakinath<br />
1980).<br />
Future Outlook<br />
India has 143 million ha of arable land. Nearly 50%<br />
is to be irrigated by 1990. The area under pearl millet<br />
has remained relatively stable, about 11 million ha<br />
over the past 30 years (10.58-13.93 million ha from<br />
1954-1985). It is unlikely that a substantial pearl<br />
millet area would be lost to irrigation and other<br />
crops. Pearl millet production could be stabilized at<br />
over 5 million t during the 1980s. Productivity<br />
crossed the 500 kg ha' 1 mark in 1980-84, and could<br />
be elevated to 2000 kg ha -1 . Pearl millet continues to<br />
play a significant role in Indian food production as<br />
well as the economy.<br />
Given the will and improved seed, and some fertilizer<br />
and irrigation where feasible, the productivity<br />
and production of pearl millet could be increased<br />
two- to four-fold. Substitution for rice and wheat by<br />
millets in food products, identification of new uses<br />
for pearl millet, development of white pearl millets<br />
and pearl millets with defined uses, price supports<br />
assured by firm procurement, distribution of millets<br />
during low production years, and utilization in food<br />
for work and nutritional networks, all would accelerate<br />
the growth, development, and utilization of<br />
pearl millet, an indispensable cereal of the semi-arid<br />
and arid tropics.<br />
References<br />
A I C M I P (All India Coordinated Millets Improvement<br />
Project). 1977-86. Progress reports. Pune, Maharashtra,<br />
India: A I C M I P .<br />
A I C M I P (All India Coordinated Millets Improvement<br />
Project). 1980. Annual report 1979-80. New Delhi, India:<br />
Indian Council of Agricultural Research.<br />
A I C M I P (All India Coordinated Millets Improvement<br />
Project). 1983. Millets Workshop, Apr 1980, Coordinator's<br />
review. Pune, Maharashtra, India: A I C M I P .<br />
De Rajat, and Gautam, R.C. 1987. Management practices<br />
to increase and stabilize pearl millet production in India.<br />
Pages 247-253, these proceedings.<br />
Dwarakinath, R. 1980. Performance, potential and constraints<br />
in agriculture—The Karnataka case. Pages 94-100<br />
in Indian agriculture: performance and potential: proceedings<br />
of a seminar organized by the Leslie Sawhney Programme,<br />
1979, Bangalore, India (Deshpande, A., and<br />
Bapat, S.B., eds.). Delhi, India: Jain Publishing House.<br />
F A O / U N E S C O . 1977. Soil map of the world. V o l . V I I .<br />
South Asia. Paris, France: UNESCO. 117 pp.<br />
Harinarayana, G. 1980. Prospects of millets research in<br />
1980's. Presented at the A l l India Coordinated Millets<br />
Improvement Project Workshop, 17-19 Apr 1980, Hisar,<br />
Haryana, India.<br />
Harinarayana, G. 1982. A I C M I P : developments since<br />
1977. Presented at the A l l India Coordinated Millets<br />
Improvement Project Workshop, 26-28 Apr 1982, Coimbatore,<br />
Tamil Nadu, India.<br />
16