02.01.2015 Views

RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Socioeconomic Factors<br />

Management. There are significant managerial differences<br />

in the dryland farming villages of India.<br />

Farmers born in traditional farming households and<br />

farmers who receive hands-on farming training<br />

proved to be better managers.<br />

Farm prices. The cost of inputs, particularly fertilizer<br />

and labor, have increased sharply in recent<br />

years, but prices for farm produce have not kept up.<br />

Fertilizer prices increased by 60% from 1980-81 to<br />

1981-82. While large and efficient farmers can<br />

rapidly adjust to fluctuations, the small farmers are<br />

caught. Farm prices should be tied to industrial<br />

prices.<br />

Credit and insurance. Farmers may not necessarily<br />

strive to maximize yields, particularly in a subsistence<br />

economy based on diversified farming.<br />

Small and marginal farmers do not have the ability<br />

to mobilize resources and cannot afford to take<br />

risks. For example, next to improved seed, fertilizer<br />

brings about the most visible changes in productivity.<br />

Large farmers readily adopt recommended practices,<br />

but even though small and marginal farmers<br />

are convinced of the utility of fertilizer application,<br />

they do not fully adopt the recommended levels<br />

because of the financial risk. Farmers are sensitive to<br />

price increases, lack of credit, and should be provided<br />

with cheap credit covered by insurance to<br />

insulate against bad weather.<br />

Transport. Small and marginal farmers have limited<br />

marketable surpluses, and middlemen are the ultimate<br />

beneficiaries if the produce is taken to regulated<br />

markets.<br />

Rural warehouses. It is necessary to develop a<br />

network of rural godowns (warehouses) to stockpile<br />

surplus production, and provide credit or advance<br />

payment that would partly ease the financial limitations<br />

of small and marginal farmers (Dwarakinath<br />

1980).<br />

Future Outlook<br />

India has 143 million ha of arable land. Nearly 50%<br />

is to be irrigated by 1990. The area under pearl millet<br />

has remained relatively stable, about 11 million ha<br />

over the past 30 years (10.58-13.93 million ha from<br />

1954-1985). It is unlikely that a substantial pearl<br />

millet area would be lost to irrigation and other<br />

crops. Pearl millet production could be stabilized at<br />

over 5 million t during the 1980s. Productivity<br />

crossed the 500 kg ha' 1 mark in 1980-84, and could<br />

be elevated to 2000 kg ha -1 . Pearl millet continues to<br />

play a significant role in Indian food production as<br />

well as the economy.<br />

Given the will and improved seed, and some fertilizer<br />

and irrigation where feasible, the productivity<br />

and production of pearl millet could be increased<br />

two- to four-fold. Substitution for rice and wheat by<br />

millets in food products, identification of new uses<br />

for pearl millet, development of white pearl millets<br />

and pearl millets with defined uses, price supports<br />

assured by firm procurement, distribution of millets<br />

during low production years, and utilization in food<br />

for work and nutritional networks, all would accelerate<br />

the growth, development, and utilization of<br />

pearl millet, an indispensable cereal of the semi-arid<br />

and arid tropics.<br />

References<br />

A I C M I P (All India Coordinated Millets Improvement<br />

Project). 1977-86. Progress reports. Pune, Maharashtra,<br />

India: A I C M I P .<br />

A I C M I P (All India Coordinated Millets Improvement<br />

Project). 1980. Annual report 1979-80. New Delhi, India:<br />

Indian Council of Agricultural Research.<br />

A I C M I P (All India Coordinated Millets Improvement<br />

Project). 1983. Millets Workshop, Apr 1980, Coordinator's<br />

review. Pune, Maharashtra, India: A I C M I P .<br />

De Rajat, and Gautam, R.C. 1987. Management practices<br />

to increase and stabilize pearl millet production in India.<br />

Pages 247-253, these proceedings.<br />

Dwarakinath, R. 1980. Performance, potential and constraints<br />

in agriculture—The Karnataka case. Pages 94-100<br />

in Indian agriculture: performance and potential: proceedings<br />

of a seminar organized by the Leslie Sawhney Programme,<br />

1979, Bangalore, India (Deshpande, A., and<br />

Bapat, S.B., eds.). Delhi, India: Jain Publishing House.<br />

F A O / U N E S C O . 1977. Soil map of the world. V o l . V I I .<br />

South Asia. Paris, France: UNESCO. 117 pp.<br />

Harinarayana, G. 1980. Prospects of millets research in<br />

1980's. Presented at the A l l India Coordinated Millets<br />

Improvement Project Workshop, 17-19 Apr 1980, Hisar,<br />

Haryana, India.<br />

Harinarayana, G. 1982. A I C M I P : developments since<br />

1977. Presented at the A l l India Coordinated Millets<br />

Improvement Project Workshop, 26-28 Apr 1982, Coimbatore,<br />

Tamil Nadu, India.<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!