RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
919.0<br />
1212.0,<br />
Total area: 11.19 m i l l i o n ha<br />
4993.0<br />
17.0<br />
1733.5<br />
9.3<br />
989.0<br />
218.7<br />
456.6<br />
430.0 144.5<br />
Soil and Climatic Characteristics of<br />
Pearl Millet Growing Regions<br />
In India, pearl millet is extensively grown in the<br />
northwestern, western, south central, and southern<br />
parts of the country (Fig. 1). Soils range from sandy<br />
to loamy sands in the alluvial regions of the west and<br />
northwest, but are sandy clay in the central, south<br />
central, and southern regions. Rainfall in these arid<br />
and semi-arid climates ranges between 190 mm a -1<br />
(at Jodhpur in western India) to 1000 mm a -1 (at<br />
Nandyal in south central India).<br />
Although the total rainfall in some pearl millet<br />
growing areas may appear to meet the moisture<br />
requirement of the crop, the intensity and duration<br />
of precipitation is often highly skewed so the crop<br />
may suffer from a water deficit at critical growth<br />
phases. If the monsoon rains start late and sowing is<br />
delayed, then critical moisture is often not available<br />
at the grain-filling stage because the rains stop early<br />
relative to the crop growth period.<br />
Preparatory Tillage<br />
9.5<br />
0.6<br />
F i g u r e s in '000 ha<br />
per S t a t e<br />
Figure 1. Pearl millet distribution in different states<br />
in India.<br />
The water holding capacity of both the coarsetextured<br />
desert soils in western India, and the red<br />
sandy-loam soils of southern India is extremely low.<br />
Subramaniam et al. (1973) reported that materials<br />
such as rice husks or F Y M (251 ha -1 ) incorporated to<br />
a depth of 20-45 cm 8 weeks before sowing improved<br />
the water-holding capacity of a red sandy-loam soil<br />
and thereby the yield of pearl millet.<br />
Plant Population<br />
In a situation of limited moisture, the productivity of<br />
a crop is governed by the balance that may exist<br />
between the total quantity of available soil moisture<br />
and the plant population that it can sustain. Even a<br />
modification of the crop geometry may be able to<br />
optimize soil-moisture use. In a 2-year experiment at<br />
Coimbatore, India, on a laterite-loam soil, Gautam<br />
(1975) found that at a population of 1.3 x 10 5 plants<br />
ha -1 , the best results were obtained when rowspacing<br />
was maintained at 50 cm rather than at 25,<br />
75, or 100 cm (Table 1). In an earlier experiment,<br />
Gautam (1970) found that for a loamy-sand soil of<br />
Delhi, the optimum planting geometry was 45 cm<br />
between rows and 15 cm within the rows at a population<br />
of 1.41 x 10 5 plants ha -1 (Table 2). Patil and De<br />
(1978) noted that widening the row distances in a<br />
rainfed situation decreased the preflowering moisture<br />
use. The conserved water was utilized at the<br />
grain-filling stage.<br />
Weed Management<br />
As a crop grown predominantly in the hot and moist<br />
rainy season, weeds deprive pearl millet of vital nutrients<br />
and moisture. Gautam and Kaushik (1980a)<br />
estimated that competition from weeds could reduce<br />
Table 1. Effect of row spacing on grain yield of pearl<br />
millet.<br />
Row<br />
spacing (cm)<br />
25<br />
50<br />
75<br />
100<br />
C D 5%<br />
Plant population<br />
observed<br />
('000 ha -1 )<br />
1972<br />
142<br />
135<br />
136<br />
128<br />
Source: Gautam (1975).<br />
1973<br />
133<br />
126<br />
101<br />
99<br />
Grain yield<br />
(kg ha -1 )<br />
1972<br />
1630<br />
2000<br />
1610<br />
1250<br />
520<br />
1973<br />
1560<br />
1960<br />
1760<br />
1700<br />
270<br />
248