02.01.2015 Views

RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• Well adapted, early-maturity, local materials are<br />

already available in local land races for use as<br />

breeding material. Primary reliance on exotic<br />

materials for early maturity may not be necessary.<br />

• In tests of new materials, breeders must employ<br />

local control cultivars which correspond to the<br />

maturity of the new cultivars being tested if valid<br />

comparisons are to be made.<br />

• Farmers are not irrationally attached to their<br />

traditional cereal cultivars. Rather they are willing,<br />

indeed anxious, to experiment with and<br />

adopt new cultivars which they evaluate as being<br />

better suited to their needs.<br />

Assigning Weights to Research on Millets of<br />

Various Maturity Groups<br />

Most cereal improvement programs in the WASAT<br />

have responded to the growing demand for earliermaturing<br />

cultivars by accenting this characteristic in<br />

their selection and breeding. Methods to establish<br />

priorities among maturity groups, however, are<br />

poorly defined. The ICRISAT Millet Improvement<br />

Program in Burkina Faso, for example, focuses on<br />

breeding two cultivar groups for the Sudan savanna<br />

transition zone: photoperiod-sensitive, full-season<br />

cultivars which mature in about 120-140 d; and<br />

photoperiod-low-sensitive or photoperiod-insensitive,<br />

short-duration cultivars (80-110 d) for late sowing<br />

conditions. While it is difficult to define with precision,<br />

the current allocation of program resources is<br />

approximately three-quarters to long- and onequarter<br />

to short-cycle materials.<br />

One way to test whether this is an appropriate<br />

balance is to compare the allocation of research<br />

resources with the maximum potential area on<br />

which cultivars of various maturities could be adopted<br />

as direct replacements for locals while holding planting<br />

patterns (timing, area, etc.) unchanged. In Burkina<br />

Faso, outside of the Sahel there is very limited<br />

first planting adoption potential for new millet cultivars<br />

with cycle lengths of less than 110 d (less than<br />

15% of millet area is available in the Sudan and less<br />

than 5% in the northern Guinea savanna) (Fig. 1).<br />

To reach adoption potential of 50% of first planting<br />

area, cultivars with maturity lengths of 115-135 d are<br />

appropriate in the Sahel, 130-140 d in the Sudan<br />

savanna, and cultivars > 165 d are required in the<br />

northern Guinean zone. As material for replanting,<br />

the potential for early-maturing millets is only<br />

slightly more important, and is generally less than<br />

15% of the area in the Sahel and Sudan savanna.<br />

Thus the total adoption potential of 80-110 d cultivars<br />

in the Sudan savanna villages varied between<br />

about 17% in 1981 to about 22% in 1982. According<br />

to these studies the data suggest a nearly correct<br />

allocation of resources in the Burkina Faso millet<br />

program to the short-maturity group.<br />

Short-maturity cultivars would be grown more if<br />

cropping systems were adopted which use relay<br />

cropping or delayed first plantings to allow greater<br />

soil preparation. But to justify allocating more<br />

resources to breeding such cultivars, researchers<br />

should first clearly define the alternative cropping<br />

systems for these cultivars, and evaluate the likelihood<br />

of these systems being adopted in the foreseeable<br />

future.<br />

The timing of farmers' plantings has another<br />

important implication in setting millet improvement<br />

objectives. Labor-intensive, hand-planting methods<br />

and the irregular distribution of early-season rainfall<br />

combine to extend major first plantings of millet<br />

over a period of about 45 d in the Sahel zone to more<br />

than 60 d in the northern Guinean Zone. Under these<br />

circumstances photoperiod-insensitive cultivars with<br />

short planting windows are poorly suited for broad<br />

adoption. An important degree of photoperiod sensitivity,<br />

which lends increased planting date flexibility,<br />

is necessary to expand the adoption potential of<br />

new cultivars.<br />

Comparative Management Responsiveness<br />

among Crops and Cultivars<br />

The different responses of major cereals to enhanced<br />

soil fertility and improved soil tillage is well documented.<br />

The implications of such differences to crop<br />

improvement strategies in diversified cropping systems<br />

and input scarcity is less well recognized.<br />

Technical Response and Returns to Fertilizer<br />

The experimental results found by the Institut de<br />

Recherches Agronomiques Tropicales et des Cultures<br />

Vivrieres (I<strong>RA</strong>T) in Burkina Faso is typical of<br />

the broad differences in response to fertilizer among<br />

cereals (Bonnal 1983). During 1978-1982 in two<br />

locations, 100 kg cotton complex fertilizer (14:23:15)<br />

plus 50 kg ha -1 urea (47% N) gave a grain-yield<br />

increment that was highest for sorghum (760 kg<br />

ha -1 ), and substantially lower for millet (230 kg<br />

ha -1 ). Similar crop differentials have been observed<br />

237

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!