RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
• Well adapted, early-maturity, local materials are<br />
already available in local land races for use as<br />
breeding material. Primary reliance on exotic<br />
materials for early maturity may not be necessary.<br />
• In tests of new materials, breeders must employ<br />
local control cultivars which correspond to the<br />
maturity of the new cultivars being tested if valid<br />
comparisons are to be made.<br />
• Farmers are not irrationally attached to their<br />
traditional cereal cultivars. Rather they are willing,<br />
indeed anxious, to experiment with and<br />
adopt new cultivars which they evaluate as being<br />
better suited to their needs.<br />
Assigning Weights to Research on Millets of<br />
Various Maturity Groups<br />
Most cereal improvement programs in the WASAT<br />
have responded to the growing demand for earliermaturing<br />
cultivars by accenting this characteristic in<br />
their selection and breeding. Methods to establish<br />
priorities among maturity groups, however, are<br />
poorly defined. The ICRISAT Millet Improvement<br />
Program in Burkina Faso, for example, focuses on<br />
breeding two cultivar groups for the Sudan savanna<br />
transition zone: photoperiod-sensitive, full-season<br />
cultivars which mature in about 120-140 d; and<br />
photoperiod-low-sensitive or photoperiod-insensitive,<br />
short-duration cultivars (80-110 d) for late sowing<br />
conditions. While it is difficult to define with precision,<br />
the current allocation of program resources is<br />
approximately three-quarters to long- and onequarter<br />
to short-cycle materials.<br />
One way to test whether this is an appropriate<br />
balance is to compare the allocation of research<br />
resources with the maximum potential area on<br />
which cultivars of various maturities could be adopted<br />
as direct replacements for locals while holding planting<br />
patterns (timing, area, etc.) unchanged. In Burkina<br />
Faso, outside of the Sahel there is very limited<br />
first planting adoption potential for new millet cultivars<br />
with cycle lengths of less than 110 d (less than<br />
15% of millet area is available in the Sudan and less<br />
than 5% in the northern Guinea savanna) (Fig. 1).<br />
To reach adoption potential of 50% of first planting<br />
area, cultivars with maturity lengths of 115-135 d are<br />
appropriate in the Sahel, 130-140 d in the Sudan<br />
savanna, and cultivars > 165 d are required in the<br />
northern Guinean zone. As material for replanting,<br />
the potential for early-maturing millets is only<br />
slightly more important, and is generally less than<br />
15% of the area in the Sahel and Sudan savanna.<br />
Thus the total adoption potential of 80-110 d cultivars<br />
in the Sudan savanna villages varied between<br />
about 17% in 1981 to about 22% in 1982. According<br />
to these studies the data suggest a nearly correct<br />
allocation of resources in the Burkina Faso millet<br />
program to the short-maturity group.<br />
Short-maturity cultivars would be grown more if<br />
cropping systems were adopted which use relay<br />
cropping or delayed first plantings to allow greater<br />
soil preparation. But to justify allocating more<br />
resources to breeding such cultivars, researchers<br />
should first clearly define the alternative cropping<br />
systems for these cultivars, and evaluate the likelihood<br />
of these systems being adopted in the foreseeable<br />
future.<br />
The timing of farmers' plantings has another<br />
important implication in setting millet improvement<br />
objectives. Labor-intensive, hand-planting methods<br />
and the irregular distribution of early-season rainfall<br />
combine to extend major first plantings of millet<br />
over a period of about 45 d in the Sahel zone to more<br />
than 60 d in the northern Guinean Zone. Under these<br />
circumstances photoperiod-insensitive cultivars with<br />
short planting windows are poorly suited for broad<br />
adoption. An important degree of photoperiod sensitivity,<br />
which lends increased planting date flexibility,<br />
is necessary to expand the adoption potential of<br />
new cultivars.<br />
Comparative Management Responsiveness<br />
among Crops and Cultivars<br />
The different responses of major cereals to enhanced<br />
soil fertility and improved soil tillage is well documented.<br />
The implications of such differences to crop<br />
improvement strategies in diversified cropping systems<br />
and input scarcity is less well recognized.<br />
Technical Response and Returns to Fertilizer<br />
The experimental results found by the Institut de<br />
Recherches Agronomiques Tropicales et des Cultures<br />
Vivrieres (I<strong>RA</strong>T) in Burkina Faso is typical of<br />
the broad differences in response to fertilizer among<br />
cereals (Bonnal 1983). During 1978-1982 in two<br />
locations, 100 kg cotton complex fertilizer (14:23:15)<br />
plus 50 kg ha -1 urea (47% N) gave a grain-yield<br />
increment that was highest for sorghum (760 kg<br />
ha -1 ), and substantially lower for millet (230 kg<br />
ha -1 ). Similar crop differentials have been observed<br />
237