02.01.2015 Views

RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Second Phase<br />

The second phase started with the use of the malesterile<br />

line 5071 A, which was bred at Delhi by mutational<br />

change from Tift 23A. It showed less downy<br />

mildew incidence in the seed crop, and its hybrids<br />

varied in their disease resistance.<br />

Three hybrids had 5071 A as the seed parent<br />

(Table 2), but they did not become popular because<br />

of their low yields and their continued susceptibility<br />

to downy mildew. Within a year or two they were no<br />

longer cultivated.<br />

During this second phase, an attempt was made to<br />

diversify the female background. Two hybrids bred<br />

at Ludhiana, PHB10 and PHB14 (later named HB 6<br />

and HB 7), were released. These hybrids had the<br />

Ludhiana male-sterile line Pb 111A as the seed parent.<br />

In Gujarat, hybrid GHB 1399 (on male-sterile line<br />

126D2A) was bred at Jamnagar and released.<br />

Table 4. Performance of second phase pearl millet<br />

hybrids in coordinated trials.<br />

Year<br />

1974-75<br />

1975-76<br />

1976-77<br />

Mean<br />

I. Irrigated.<br />

N H B 3<br />

1420<br />

1330<br />

1380<br />

NHB 5<br />

Grain yield (kg ha -1 )<br />

1770<br />

1200<br />

1360<br />

1440<br />

HB 6<br />

1960<br />

1100<br />

1530<br />

HB 7<br />

1860<br />

1290<br />

1720<br />

1620<br />

GHB 1399 1<br />

2460<br />

2120<br />

2290<br />

The performance of these hybrids is presented in<br />

Table 4. A l l had good downy mildew resistance,<br />

however none of them were widely cultivated commercially,<br />

and they lasted 2-3 years. This marked the<br />

end of the second-phase hybrids.<br />

Third Phase<br />

The third phase started with the use of two new<br />

downy mildew resistant male-sterile lines developed<br />

at Delhi from Tift 23A. These lines, 5141A and<br />

5054A, had good downy mildew resistance and were<br />

widely used. These were the seed parents of hybrids<br />

such as BJ 104, BK560, and CJ 104, which became<br />

very popular and were widely cultivated (Table 2).<br />

The grain yield data and downy mildew incidence of<br />

these hybrids are shown in Table 5.<br />

These hybrids were cultivated from 1977-84, but a<br />

high incidence of downy mildew on 5141A, and the<br />

resultant susceptibility in its hybrids caused it to be<br />

phased out as a hybrid parent in 1985. Moreover, CJ<br />

104, which had 5054A as the seed parent, also<br />

became susceptible. The third phase of hybrid era is<br />

ending, as 5141A and its derivatives are no longer<br />

used.<br />

During the latter part of this third phase, five<br />

hybrids were released which had three male-sterile<br />

lines as the seed parent other than 5141A (Table 2).<br />

The grain yield and downy mildew incidence of these<br />

hybrids is presented in Table 6. Two of these five<br />

hybrids were released by M A H Y C O , a private<br />

company.<br />

Table 5. Performance of third phase pearl millet hybrids in co-ordinated trials.<br />

Hybrids<br />

BJ 104<br />

BK 560<br />

BD 111<br />

BD 763<br />

GHB 27<br />

GHB 32<br />

COH 2<br />

Local<br />

1977<br />

2360<br />

2250<br />

2440<br />

2320<br />

2175<br />

2100 1<br />

-<br />

1610<br />

Susceptible control<br />

1978<br />

1920<br />

1890<br />

1790<br />

-<br />

1840<br />

1950<br />

2050<br />

1490<br />

Grain yield (kg ha -1 )<br />

1979<br />

2020<br />

.<br />

-<br />

2170<br />

2070<br />

2070<br />

2180<br />

1650<br />

1980<br />

2080<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

2100<br />

2150<br />

2290<br />

1510<br />

1981<br />

2160<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

1690<br />

Mean<br />

2110<br />

2070<br />

2120<br />

2240<br />

2050<br />

2070<br />

2170<br />

1590<br />

%<br />

BJ 104<br />

100<br />

98<br />

100<br />

106<br />

97<br />

98<br />

103<br />

76<br />

93.5 2 67.9 2 58.5 3 42.12<br />

-<br />

Downy mildew (%)<br />

1977<br />

8.3<br />

-<br />

1.1<br />

1.7<br />

6.3<br />

4.7<br />

-<br />

-<br />

1978<br />

9.8<br />

5.5<br />

3.7<br />

-<br />

1.2<br />

6.6<br />

4.0<br />

-<br />

1979<br />

13.7<br />

-<br />

-<br />

1.7<br />

0.9<br />

1.4<br />

2.7<br />

-<br />

1980<br />

8.7<br />

3.1<br />

-<br />

-<br />

2.5<br />

1.5<br />

3.7<br />

-<br />

1981<br />

8.1<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

-<br />

Mean<br />

9.7<br />

4.3<br />

2.4<br />

1.7<br />

2.7<br />

3.6<br />

3.5<br />

-<br />

65.5 3<br />

Trial mean 2140<br />

1880<br />

2000<br />

2110<br />

2180<br />

2060<br />

98<br />

1. From IPMHT-1<br />

2. HB 3<br />

3. NHB 3<br />

124

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!