RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Second Phase<br />
The second phase started with the use of the malesterile<br />
line 5071 A, which was bred at Delhi by mutational<br />
change from Tift 23A. It showed less downy<br />
mildew incidence in the seed crop, and its hybrids<br />
varied in their disease resistance.<br />
Three hybrids had 5071 A as the seed parent<br />
(Table 2), but they did not become popular because<br />
of their low yields and their continued susceptibility<br />
to downy mildew. Within a year or two they were no<br />
longer cultivated.<br />
During this second phase, an attempt was made to<br />
diversify the female background. Two hybrids bred<br />
at Ludhiana, PHB10 and PHB14 (later named HB 6<br />
and HB 7), were released. These hybrids had the<br />
Ludhiana male-sterile line Pb 111A as the seed parent.<br />
In Gujarat, hybrid GHB 1399 (on male-sterile line<br />
126D2A) was bred at Jamnagar and released.<br />
Table 4. Performance of second phase pearl millet<br />
hybrids in coordinated trials.<br />
Year<br />
1974-75<br />
1975-76<br />
1976-77<br />
Mean<br />
I. Irrigated.<br />
N H B 3<br />
1420<br />
1330<br />
1380<br />
NHB 5<br />
Grain yield (kg ha -1 )<br />
1770<br />
1200<br />
1360<br />
1440<br />
HB 6<br />
1960<br />
1100<br />
1530<br />
HB 7<br />
1860<br />
1290<br />
1720<br />
1620<br />
GHB 1399 1<br />
2460<br />
2120<br />
2290<br />
The performance of these hybrids is presented in<br />
Table 4. A l l had good downy mildew resistance,<br />
however none of them were widely cultivated commercially,<br />
and they lasted 2-3 years. This marked the<br />
end of the second-phase hybrids.<br />
Third Phase<br />
The third phase started with the use of two new<br />
downy mildew resistant male-sterile lines developed<br />
at Delhi from Tift 23A. These lines, 5141A and<br />
5054A, had good downy mildew resistance and were<br />
widely used. These were the seed parents of hybrids<br />
such as BJ 104, BK560, and CJ 104, which became<br />
very popular and were widely cultivated (Table 2).<br />
The grain yield data and downy mildew incidence of<br />
these hybrids are shown in Table 5.<br />
These hybrids were cultivated from 1977-84, but a<br />
high incidence of downy mildew on 5141A, and the<br />
resultant susceptibility in its hybrids caused it to be<br />
phased out as a hybrid parent in 1985. Moreover, CJ<br />
104, which had 5054A as the seed parent, also<br />
became susceptible. The third phase of hybrid era is<br />
ending, as 5141A and its derivatives are no longer<br />
used.<br />
During the latter part of this third phase, five<br />
hybrids were released which had three male-sterile<br />
lines as the seed parent other than 5141A (Table 2).<br />
The grain yield and downy mildew incidence of these<br />
hybrids is presented in Table 6. Two of these five<br />
hybrids were released by M A H Y C O , a private<br />
company.<br />
Table 5. Performance of third phase pearl millet hybrids in co-ordinated trials.<br />
Hybrids<br />
BJ 104<br />
BK 560<br />
BD 111<br />
BD 763<br />
GHB 27<br />
GHB 32<br />
COH 2<br />
Local<br />
1977<br />
2360<br />
2250<br />
2440<br />
2320<br />
2175<br />
2100 1<br />
-<br />
1610<br />
Susceptible control<br />
1978<br />
1920<br />
1890<br />
1790<br />
-<br />
1840<br />
1950<br />
2050<br />
1490<br />
Grain yield (kg ha -1 )<br />
1979<br />
2020<br />
.<br />
-<br />
2170<br />
2070<br />
2070<br />
2180<br />
1650<br />
1980<br />
2080<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
2100<br />
2150<br />
2290<br />
1510<br />
1981<br />
2160<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
1690<br />
Mean<br />
2110<br />
2070<br />
2120<br />
2240<br />
2050<br />
2070<br />
2170<br />
1590<br />
%<br />
BJ 104<br />
100<br />
98<br />
100<br />
106<br />
97<br />
98<br />
103<br />
76<br />
93.5 2 67.9 2 58.5 3 42.12<br />
-<br />
Downy mildew (%)<br />
1977<br />
8.3<br />
-<br />
1.1<br />
1.7<br />
6.3<br />
4.7<br />
-<br />
-<br />
1978<br />
9.8<br />
5.5<br />
3.7<br />
-<br />
1.2<br />
6.6<br />
4.0<br />
-<br />
1979<br />
13.7<br />
-<br />
-<br />
1.7<br />
0.9<br />
1.4<br />
2.7<br />
-<br />
1980<br />
8.7<br />
3.1<br />
-<br />
-<br />
2.5<br />
1.5<br />
3.7<br />
-<br />
1981<br />
8.1<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
-<br />
Mean<br />
9.7<br />
4.3<br />
2.4<br />
1.7<br />
2.7<br />
3.6<br />
3.5<br />
-<br />
65.5 3<br />
Trial mean 2140<br />
1880<br />
2000<br />
2110<br />
2180<br />
2060<br />
98<br />
1. From IPMHT-1<br />
2. HB 3<br />
3. NHB 3<br />
124