02.01.2015 Views

RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

these two methods has been undertaken at Nebraska.<br />

Three base populations, called S 0 , B 0 , and K 0 are<br />

shown in Figure 3. From these, replicate subpopulations<br />

were created using either RFS or S 1 line per se<br />

selection as shown in Figure 4. The replicates are<br />

continued independently of each other and provide<br />

an error term for comparing breeding methods.<br />

Some drift is likely among these replicates because<br />

only 10 S, lines are selected for recombination in<br />

each cycle. Five cycles of selection are now completed<br />

in this study, but evaluation is not yet complete.<br />

The responses reported here were originally<br />

reported by Thomas (1979) and cover the first two<br />

cycles with very extensive evaluation.<br />

The cycles of S 1 per se and RFS selection were<br />

tested as bulked inbred populations, as random<br />

mated populations, and in variety crosses. By selfing<br />

100 or so plants and bulking seed from them, an<br />

inbred population would be formed that could then<br />

be tested to measure the direct response to S 1 per se<br />

selection and an indirect response to RFS selection.<br />

Similarly, the variety crosses were used to measure<br />

the direct response to RFS and the indirect response<br />

to S 1 per se selection. The random-mated populations<br />

not only permitted the evaluation of each type<br />

of selection for intravarietal improvement but also<br />

allowed the calculation of changes in heterosis and<br />

inbreeding depression.<br />

The selection criterion used is an index of yield (kg<br />

ha -1 ) multiplied by the proportion of upright plants<br />

and the proportion of plants without dropped ears.<br />

This produces a value best called machine harvestable<br />

yield ( M H Y ) calculated from hand harvested<br />

data:<br />

Index<br />

( M H Y ) =<br />

Yield<br />

adjusted to<br />

15.5%<br />

moisture<br />

Proportion<br />

x upright x<br />

plants<br />

Proportion<br />

plants<br />

without<br />

dropped ears<br />

This index has been applied to all of the family<br />

selection studies at Nebraska for some years with<br />

apparent success [cf. Subandi et al. (1973), Compton<br />

and Lonnquist (1982)].<br />

The experiment was conducted with five replications<br />

in two watering treatments at two locations in 2<br />

Figure 4. Subpopulations (relicates) formed by two cycles of S 1 line per se selection and 2 cycles of R F S<br />

selection in the B, S, and K populations. — = generations advance, — = testcross.<br />

117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!