02.01.2015 Views

RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

RA 00110.pdf - OAR@ICRISAT

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Practical Recurrent Selection in Cross-pollinated Crops 1<br />

W . A . Compton 2 , M . A . Thomas-Compton 3 , and D.J. Andrews 4<br />

Abstract<br />

Techniques used to carry out recurrent selection, especially in cross-pollinated crops, are discussed in some<br />

detail. Topics covered are (1) the influence of effective population size and selection pressure on fixation of<br />

favorable genes, (2) choice of the population in which to practice selection, (3) the target environment, (4)<br />

sampling environments, and (5) blocking techniques. Intrapopulation and interpopulation selection<br />

methods are discussed and compared, including advantages and disadvantages of each and the appropriate<br />

prediction equations. Data from a large study comparing line per se selection with reciprocal recurrent<br />

selection are reported. Results indicate a similar rate of gain in the variety cross using each of the two<br />

systems, but in each case the gain is due to very different genetic changes. Line per se selection has<br />

apparently increased the variety cross largely through additive effects while reciprocal recurrent selection<br />

appears to have improved the performance of the variety cross through nonadditive effects, as suggested by<br />

theory.<br />

Introduction<br />

Both pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum) and<br />

maize [Zea mays (L.)] are highly cross-pollinated<br />

crops, but far more quantitative genetic studies and<br />

recurrent selection experiments using maize as a test<br />

organism have been reported (Sprague 1977, Hallauer<br />

and Miranda 1981). Much more data, therefore,<br />

are available for maize which can be of value to<br />

those engaged in recurrent selection in pearl millet.<br />

While the genetic responses to selection in pearl<br />

millet and maize are expected to be similar (Rai and<br />

1. Published as Paper No.7952, Journal series, Nebraska Agricultural Research Division.<br />

2. Plant Breeder, Department of Agronomy, University of Nebraska, Lincoln NE 68583, USA.<br />

3. Biotechnologist and Popcorn Breeder in the same department.<br />

4. Plant Breeder, 279, Plant Sciences, East Campus, UNL, Lincoln, NE 68583-0910, USA.<br />

ICRISAT (International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics). 1987. Proceedings of the International Pearl Millet<br />

Workshop, 7-11 April 1986, ICRISAT Center, India. Patancheru, A.P. 502324, India: ICRISAT.<br />

107

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!