02.01.2015 Views

Minutes - USC: University Students' Council of UWO : Page not found

Minutes - USC: University Students' Council of UWO : Page not found

Minutes - USC: University Students' Council of UWO : Page not found

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Minutes</strong> <strong>of</strong> the 4th Meeting <strong>of</strong> the 2012/2013 <strong>University</strong> Students’ <strong>Council</strong> <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> Western Ontario held on October 24, 2012 in <strong>Council</strong> Chambers,<br />

Room 315, <strong>University</strong> Community Centre<br />

Note: This meeting can be viewed in full or in part via streaming video at<br />

http://www.usc.uwo.ca/government/council/meetings/index.asp.<br />

1. CALL TO ORDER<br />

The Speaker called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m.<br />

2. O CANADA<br />

3. WESTERN SCHOOL SONG<br />

4. ATTENDANCE<br />

Present<br />

Addison, Emily<br />

Asantey, Kojo<br />

Bain, Daniel<br />

Bedeir, Tasneem<br />

Bhatia, Meghan<br />

Bitondo, Domenic<br />

Blixt, Taylor<br />

Brown, Liam<br />

Brown, Spencer<br />

Bucio Betancourt, Gina<br />

Camilleri, Jordan<br />

Carter, Andrea<br />

Catton, Ali<br />

Charles, Austin<br />

Cheese, Nicole<br />

Coop-Menard, Jordan<br />

Cox, Grete<br />

Damji, Ali<br />

Doshi, Samik<br />

Ennett, Dave<br />

Absent With Regrets<br />

Helfand, Matthew<br />

Absent Without Regrets<br />

Fearnall, Adam<br />

Gao, Golden<br />

Gray, Kayla<br />

Hao, Jennifer<br />

Hartley, Rebecca<br />

Harvey, Caitlin<br />

Jennings, Morgan<br />

Jim, Gucio<br />

Jodzio, Adrian<br />

Krishnapillai, Samanta<br />

Kwan, Pearl<br />

Lafortune, Max<br />

Lesarge, Jon<br />

Li, Qingning<br />

Locke, Gordon<br />

Lyons, Connor<br />

Mabtoul, Karima<br />

Marani, Husayn<br />

Mark, Kelly<br />

McCrea, Ryan<br />

Noronha, Diego<br />

McGuire, Ashley<br />

Nguyen, Lisa<br />

Pascalau, Bogdan<br />

Paulseth, Atle<br />

Pilo, Nikki<br />

Prabhu, Vivek<br />

Pronk, Blake<br />

Ritchie, Elise<br />

Santucci, Jessica<br />

Santucci, Olivia<br />

Saravanabavan, Sujen<br />

Smith, Adam<br />

Soti, Emily<br />

Stevenson, Melinda<br />

Swamy, Desmond<br />

Van Dusen, Sarah<br />

Whelan, Patrick<br />

Yeung, Spencer<br />

Zhu, Maggie<br />

Zhu, Rongbo<br />

1


<strong>Minutes</strong> <strong>of</strong> the 12/13 <strong>Council</strong> 4th Meeting October 24, 2012<br />

Hamel-Carassi, Isabelle<br />

Jansen, Jazmyn<br />

Jolivet, Aaron<br />

Khan, Raza<br />

McDermid, Alexis<br />

Power, Brendan<br />

Non-Voting Members and Observers<br />

Wes Thomas, Business Director Richmond and Tower Productions<br />

Michelle Foglton, Inside Ride<br />

Rylan Kinnon, Executive Director Ontario Undergraduate Students’ Alliance<br />

Andrew Kanapatski, Presidential Liaison Commissioner<br />

Brian Belman, Provincial Affairs Commissioner<br />

Myuri Komaragiri, Vice-President Campus Issues<br />

Jeremy Santucci, Vice-President Communications<br />

Tony Ayala, Vice-President Finance<br />

Erin Uberig, Vice-President Student Events<br />

Alysha Li, Vice-President <strong>University</strong> Affairs<br />

Andrew Shaw, Governance Officer<br />

Speaker: Brent Duncan<br />

Deputy Speaker: Jonathan English<br />

Secretary: Sandi Roddy<br />

5. ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA<br />

The following additions to the agenda were proposed:<br />

10.2 Richmond and Tower Productions<br />

10.6 Turf Fields Update<br />

10.7 President’s Speech Update<br />

10.8 Executive Strategic Alignment<br />

Motion to adopt the agenda as amended.<br />

Cheese/Marani/Carried<br />

6. RATIFICATION OF MINUTES OF PAST MEETINGS<br />

There were no minutes to be ratified.<br />

7. SPEAKER’S ANNOUNCEMENTS<br />

Duncan reminded <strong>Council</strong>lors to send any event announcements they want distributed to<br />

all <strong>of</strong> <strong>Council</strong> to the Legislative Assistant on Fridays.<br />

8. MEMBERS’ ANNOUNCEMENTS<br />

Li extended her thanks to those who had attended the first academic forum.<br />

9. COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS FROM THE WESTERN COMMUNITY


<strong>Minutes</strong> <strong>of</strong> the 12/13 <strong>Council</strong> 4th Meeting October 24, 2012<br />

10. PRESENTATIONS TO COUNCIL<br />

10.2 Richmond and Tower Productions<br />

Thomas presented a trailer for the play “November” being presented by Richmond and<br />

Tower Production at the Arts Project from October 23rd through October 27th.<br />

10.3 Inside Ride (Appendix 1)<br />

Foglton advised <strong>Council</strong> <strong>of</strong> the Inside Ride event taking place at Western on November<br />

18, 2012 to raise funds for the Coast 2 Coast Against Cancer Foundation. She <strong>not</strong>ed that<br />

last year’s event had raised $16,000 and organizers hoped to raise $30,000 this years.<br />

She asked for <strong>Council</strong>’s help in spreading the word about the event to their constituents,<br />

organizing teams <strong>of</strong> six to participate and volunteering to help with the event.<br />

10.1 Ontario Undergraduate Students’ Alliance (OUSA) (Appendix 2)<br />

Li, in her role as current OUSA President, introduced Rylan Kinnon, OUSA Executive<br />

Director and advised that they had visited all <strong>of</strong> OUSA’s member schools to inform them<br />

about OUSA.<br />

Kinnon provided an overview <strong>of</strong> OUSA’s history, current membership, and their vision<br />

and mission statements. He also advised <strong>Council</strong> <strong>of</strong> OUSA’s top lobby priorities on<br />

behalf <strong>of</strong> students.<br />

10.4 Biz Inc.<br />

Ayala provided a brief background <strong>of</strong> Biz Inc and introduced John Pollock, Executive<br />

Director <strong>of</strong> Biz Inc.<br />

Pollock advised <strong>Council</strong> <strong>of</strong> the history <strong>of</strong> Biz Inc and <strong>not</strong>ed that it was started to find and<br />

empower student entrepreneurs two years ago and received its initial three-years <strong>of</strong><br />

funding from the London Economic Development Corporation (LEDC). He <strong>not</strong>ed that<br />

Biz Inc. is now also operating at Fanshawe College and has helped with over one hundred<br />

student business and social enterprise projects. He introduced the partners in one <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Biz Inc projects who gave <strong>Council</strong> an brief demonstration <strong>of</strong> the mobile application,<br />

Game Press, they have developed with the help <strong>of</strong> Biz Inc.<br />

10.5 Multi Faith Survey Data (Appendix 3)<br />

Komaragiri advised that students see multi-faith as a priority and that the <strong>USC</strong> should<br />

foster community between the diverse faith groups on campus as spirituality and faith<br />

contribute to well-being. Bain reviewed the data from the survey that was conducted<br />

with students over the summer months. Komaragiri outlined the steps to be taken<br />

moving forward from the survey including bring representatives from all the religious<br />

clubs and groups on campus together to outline what each group’s priorities are and<br />

submit these priorities for negotiation. She <strong>not</strong>ed that all groups would be working<br />

together to determine how this can be institutionalized beyond the current vision.<br />

10.6 Turf Field Update<br />

3


<strong>Minutes</strong> <strong>of</strong> the 12/13 <strong>Council</strong> 4th Meeting October 24, 2012<br />

Fearnall advised that the goal <strong>of</strong> this presentation was to provide <strong>Council</strong> with an update<br />

on developments on the turf fields issue since the last discussion (see Meeting #3,<br />

September 26, 2012). He advised that the <strong>University</strong> has decided that a referendum<br />

seeking a fee <strong>of</strong> $12.00 would probably <strong>not</strong> be successful and a new proposal has been<br />

received which would see the <strong>University</strong> coming to the table with fifty percent <strong>of</strong> the cost<br />

<strong>of</strong> the turf fields where they had previously <strong>of</strong>fered no contribution to the funding <strong>of</strong> the<br />

$4.5 million project. The balance would be raised through a fee increase through the<br />

Student Services Committee (SSC) <strong>of</strong> approximately $5.00 which would be split between<br />

the Campus Recreation fee and the Intercollegiate Athletics fee. He <strong>not</strong>ed that, if <strong>Council</strong><br />

agreed, the <strong>USC</strong> could consider going to referendum for this fee instead <strong>of</strong> going through<br />

the SSC.<br />

10.7 President’s Speech Follow-up (Appendix 4 – Next Steps)<br />

Fearnall presented a summary <strong>of</strong> the issues raised in his “Untold Story <strong>of</strong> Western”<br />

speech and advised that he would work with the constituent council presidents in a<br />

summit to look at the Principles <strong>of</strong> Collaboration and Commitment document to examine<br />

the relationships between the <strong>USC</strong> and the <strong>University</strong> to be more specific on how and<br />

where students’ voices should be heard. This group will look at holding a large open<br />

meeting to discuss and determine the service levels required by students and will consult<br />

with students-at-large and councillors through other means.<br />

Fearnall advised that he hoped to have an outline for the consultation process available at<br />

exam time and hold consultation session in January. He <strong>not</strong>ed that they should have<br />

information available for the <strong>USC</strong> budget in the spring and to bring into the Western<br />

strategic planning process in September.<br />

10.8 Executive Strategic Alignment<br />

Fearnall provided <strong>Council</strong> with an overview <strong>of</strong> the structural changes that he would be<br />

proposing to <strong>Council</strong> for approval at the next meeting and invited <strong>Council</strong> members to<br />

provide their input and feedback over the upcoming month. He presented his ideas for<br />

restructuring the governance <strong>of</strong> the <strong>USC</strong> or operationalizing the Long Term Plan which<br />

was put in place during the 2011/12 year. Fearnall reviewed the job description <strong>of</strong> the<br />

<strong>USC</strong> President and the directives in the Long Term Plan to frame the issues he was<br />

bringing forward. He pointed out that the goal <strong>of</strong> the President was to implement the<br />

mandate he was elected on in his platform and to meet the needs <strong>of</strong> his constituents and<br />

advised that the check on the power <strong>of</strong> the President was in <strong>Council</strong>’s role <strong>of</strong> evaluating<br />

whether or <strong>not</strong> the President was fulfilling that mandate.<br />

Fearnall advised that there are currently two distinct parts to the role <strong>of</strong> the Executive<br />

<strong>Council</strong> and those are the responsibility for the political or government side <strong>of</strong> the<br />

organization; and the role <strong>of</strong> Directors <strong>of</strong> the corporation. He <strong>not</strong>ed that these are very<br />

different and potentially conflicting roles and, to address this conflict, he would propose<br />

the creation <strong>of</strong> a separate Board <strong>of</strong> Directors comprised <strong>of</strong> a combination <strong>of</strong> students and<br />

community members.<br />

4


<strong>Minutes</strong> <strong>of</strong> the 12/13 <strong>Council</strong> 4th Meeting October 24, 2012<br />

Fearnall also discussed his proposal to have the <strong>USC</strong> President and an Executive Vice-<br />

President run as a slate for election by the entire undergraduate student body to solidify<br />

and further legitimize the way in which the <strong>USC</strong> advocates for students. He <strong>not</strong>ed that,<br />

as part <strong>of</strong> this proposal, there would be a change in the way the other Vice-Presidents are<br />

chosen from an election to a hiring process. He added that this would make these<br />

positions more accessible to highly qualified students who have never been previously<br />

involved in the <strong>USC</strong> and give the President the ability to appropriately manage the Vice-<br />

Presidents as well as give <strong>Council</strong> the ability to hold the President accountable for the<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> the Vice-Presidents. He further stated that he would like to see these<br />

changes put in place for the next election cycle.<br />

Fearnall also proposed that; as the annual budget is the primary planning document for<br />

the organization, the current <strong>Council</strong> and Executive should be the ones negotiating how<br />

the budget will be structured to set the priorities for their year. He <strong>not</strong>ed that this change<br />

would <strong>not</strong> be possible to implement until the next budget cycle.<br />

Motion to recess for ten (10) minutes.<br />

Whelan/Jim/Carried.<br />

11. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

(http://westernusc.ca/councillors-corner/)<br />

Fearnall presented a summary <strong>of</strong> the work being done in the each <strong>of</strong> the Executive<br />

portfolios (Campus Issues, Communications, Finance, <strong>University</strong> Affairs and Student<br />

Events) as well as an update on the progress <strong>of</strong> his platform initiatives.<br />

Fearnall advised <strong>Council</strong> that the <strong>USC</strong> was in receipt <strong>of</strong> a petition <strong>of</strong> protest to stop<br />

Steven Woodworth from coming to Western to speak in November. He <strong>not</strong>ed that this<br />

speaker was being brought in by the Lifeline Western Club to speak on pro-life issues.<br />

He further advised that it is <strong>USC</strong> policy to present both sides <strong>of</strong> the argument on<br />

controversial issues. He <strong>not</strong>ed that this event would be a closed event so participants<br />

must make the choice to attend and those presenting the other side <strong>of</strong> the issue would be<br />

encouraged to host a similar event.<br />

12. STUDENT CAUCUS ON GOVERNANCE REPORT (Appendix 5)<br />

Harvey presented the questions asked by student Senators at the last meeting <strong>of</strong> Senate<br />

and the responses provided by the <strong>University</strong>. She also provided an update on the issue<br />

<strong>of</strong> a Fall Reading Break and information from other Ontario universities that have<br />

instituted a Fall Break. Harvey advised that a survey from student Senators would be<br />

coming out soon.<br />

13. STANDING COMMITTEE REPORTS<br />

(All Standing Committee reports can be viewed on the <strong>USC</strong> website at<br />

http://westernusc.ca/standing-committees/)<br />

13.1 Campus Issues Standing Committee<br />

5


<strong>Minutes</strong> <strong>of</strong> the 12/13 <strong>Council</strong> 4th Meeting October 24, 2012<br />

Jim presented the report <strong>of</strong> the Campus Issues Standing Committee and <strong>not</strong>ed that the<br />

Committee was reviewing proposed updates to the Terms <strong>of</strong> Reference for the<br />

Commissioners and Coordinators in the portfolio and would be recommending some<br />

amendments including striking the requirement to liaise with the Affiliate campuses as<br />

Western has moved toward a more united campus.<br />

13.2 Communications Standing Committee<br />

Cheese presented the report <strong>of</strong> the Communications Standing Committee and advised that<br />

CHRW Radio Western was looking at a restructure <strong>of</strong> their Board <strong>of</strong> Directors. She<br />

added that the Committee had looked at potential advertising strategies for promoting<br />

<strong>USC</strong> programs and events.<br />

13.3 Finance Standing Committee<br />

Lyons presented the report <strong>of</strong> the Finance Standing Committee and brought the following<br />

items forward for <strong>Council</strong> consideration.<br />

Motion #1 – Amendments to Honoraria Policy (Appendix 6)<br />

Recommendation from Finance Standing Committee:<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> approve the Honoraria Policy as amended.<br />

Whereas, the Gazette is the <strong>of</strong>ficial undergraduate newspaper <strong>of</strong> Western and provides<br />

students with relevant news on campus;<br />

Whereas, the Gazette editors have been receiving an honoraria for the past 20 years;<br />

Whereas, the honoraria policy was <strong>not</strong> updated to reflect this change;<br />

Be it resolved that, the Honoraria Policy be amended as follows.<br />

See attachment <strong>of</strong> proposed policy.<br />

BROWN/Nguyen/Carried. C12/13.4.1<br />

Brown spoke for the motion stating that the proposed amendments to the Honoraria<br />

Policy included adding Gazette editor honoraria to the current list <strong>of</strong> <strong>USC</strong> Coordinators<br />

that currently receive honoraria. Gazette editors currently receive honoraria however the<br />

policy was <strong>not</strong> updated to reflect the change. Proposed amendments seek to rectify this.<br />

Motion #2 – Strategic Review <strong>of</strong> the Gazette<br />

Recommendation <strong>of</strong> the Finance Standing Committee:<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> approve the Strategic Review <strong>of</strong> the Gazette as proposed.<br />

6


<strong>Minutes</strong> <strong>of</strong> the 12/13 <strong>Council</strong> 4th Meeting October 24, 2012<br />

Whereas, the <strong>USC</strong> seeks to enhance the educational experience and quality <strong>of</strong> life for all<br />

undergraduates at Western <strong>University</strong>;<br />

Whereas, the Gazette is the <strong>of</strong>ficial undergraduate newspaper <strong>of</strong> Western <strong>University</strong> and<br />

is committed to providing undergraduate students with coverage <strong>of</strong> relevant news on and<br />

<strong>of</strong>f campus;<br />

Whereas, the <strong>USC</strong> collects student fees annually on behalf <strong>of</strong> the Gazette for the<br />

purposes <strong>of</strong> the Gazette's publication;<br />

Whereas, the <strong>USC</strong> has a duty to students to ensure that student fees are being used<br />

effectively;<br />

Whereas, a review <strong>of</strong> the long-term strategic vision for the Gazette has <strong>not</strong> been<br />

conducted within recent memory;<br />

Whereas, any review <strong>of</strong> the Gazette that is conducted should be undertaken by an<br />

impartial third party that is separate from both the <strong>USC</strong> and the Gazette;<br />

Be it resolved that, an Ad-Hoc Committee be struck to review the long-term strategic<br />

vision, business, and financial operations <strong>of</strong> the Gazette;<br />

Be it further resolved that, the Ad-Hoc Committee be comprised <strong>of</strong> members with no<br />

affiliation to either the <strong>USC</strong> or the Gazette;<br />

Be it further resolved that, the members <strong>of</strong> the Ad-Hoc Committee be selected by mutual<br />

agreement <strong>of</strong> the Gazette Editor-in-Chief and the Vice-President Communications, and if<br />

an agreement can<strong>not</strong> be reached, that the Committee members be selected by resolution<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>Council</strong>;<br />

CHEESE/Ritchie/Carried. C12/13.4.2<br />

Cheese spoke for the motion stating that it was the responsibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>Council</strong>lors to ensure<br />

that these reviews are done.<br />

Motion #3 – Mustang Express Surplus Funds<br />

Recommendation <strong>of</strong> the Finance Standing Committee:<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> approve the Mustang Express Surplus Funds motion as proposed.<br />

Whereas, the <strong>USC</strong> is tasked with collecting and administering a number <strong>of</strong> student fees;<br />

Whereas, the <strong>USC</strong>, in anticipation <strong>of</strong> higher costs, collected a surplus <strong>of</strong> funds for the<br />

Mustang Express initiative;<br />

7


<strong>Minutes</strong> <strong>of</strong> the 12/13 <strong>Council</strong> 4th Meeting October 24, 2012<br />

Whereas, the surplus <strong>of</strong> funds collected in the 2011/2012 school year is approximately<br />

$130,000;<br />

Whereas, due to the scope and nature <strong>of</strong> the referendum questions, funds can<strong>not</strong> be<br />

allocated for anything outside the scope <strong>of</strong> the original referendum question;<br />

Be it resolved that, the Mustang Express fee be frozen until such time as an increase is<br />

necessary;<br />

Be it further resolved that, the Vice President Finance be tasked to assess the feasibility<br />

<strong>of</strong> reducing the Mustang Express fee through the use <strong>of</strong> surplus funds collected;<br />

Be it further resolved that, the Vice President Finance also be tasked to assess the<br />

feasibility <strong>of</strong> an exam period shuttle bus to the Via Rail station, Greyhound station and/or<br />

the London Airport, through partial use <strong>of</strong> the surplus funds up to $30,000, for the<br />

December 2012 exam period with an option to extend it to the April 2013 exam period;<br />

Be it further resolved that, the Vice President Finance report back to the November<br />

meeting <strong>of</strong> the <strong>USC</strong> with a detailed plan and cost structure <strong>of</strong> the pilot project.<br />

BROWN/Smith/Carried. C12/13.4.3<br />

Brown spoke for the motion and advised that this fund represents excess money from the<br />

Mustang Express fee and the <strong>USC</strong> is looking for a way to use this money to benefit<br />

students. Smith added that the money in this fund must be used for the Mustang Express<br />

and it is felt that students would support this initiative as it was part <strong>of</strong> Fearnall’s<br />

platform. Ayala also added that the pilot project could cost only $15,000 and the <strong>USC</strong><br />

would be launching a survey on Friday, October 26th to ask students if they would use<br />

this service and when and for how many days it should be <strong>of</strong>fered. He also <strong>not</strong>ed that he<br />

and the Finance Department were looking for efficiencies before bringing a motion to<br />

<strong>Council</strong>.<br />

13.4 Student Events Standing Committee<br />

Bedeir presented the report <strong>of</strong> the Student Events Standing Committee and <strong>not</strong>ed that the<br />

Vice-President Student Events had advised the Committee that a decision would need to<br />

be made regarding the location <strong>of</strong> the future Homecoming parades as there would be a<br />

cost from the City for police <strong>of</strong>ficers to close the streets if the parade was held in the<br />

downtown area but there would be no cost to hold the parade on campus.<br />

Ennett <strong>not</strong>ed that the issue with the parade this year was that the <strong>USC</strong> was only <strong>not</strong>ified a<br />

week prior to the parade that there would be a cost. He asked if it was possible that more<br />

could be done with the Alumni and the City to look at other alternatives.<br />

8


<strong>Minutes</strong> <strong>of</strong> the 12/13 <strong>Council</strong> 4th Meeting October 24, 2012<br />

13.5 <strong>University</strong> Affairs Standing Committee<br />

Ennett presented the report <strong>of</strong> the <strong>University</strong> Affairs Standing Committee and advised<br />

that the Vice-President <strong>University</strong> Affairs had <strong>not</strong>ed that Western had released their<br />

Strategic Management Agreement and the Committee had discussed questions such as<br />

why these seven research intensive universities were chosen to become part <strong>of</strong> a Credit<br />

Transfer Consortium and what input the <strong>USC</strong> should have into the Western Strategic<br />

Plan.<br />

13.6 Committee <strong>of</strong> <strong>Council</strong> Operations and Agenda (COCOA)<br />

Duncan presented the report <strong>of</strong> COCOA and brought the following item forward for<br />

<strong>Council</strong> consideration.<br />

MOTION #4 - By-law Amendments<br />

Recommendation from COCOA:<br />

That <strong>Council</strong> approve the following motion.<br />

Whereas, an Agenda Report has been disseminated to <strong>Council</strong> detailing the proposed<br />

amendments and the reasoning behind them;<br />

Be it resolved that, <strong>Council</strong> ratify By-Law amendments, as amended by the Executive<br />

<strong>Council</strong> at its September 25, 2012 in-camera meeting, as follows:<br />

By-Law #1:<br />

6.09 Execution <strong>of</strong> Contracts<br />

(4) All contractual matters relating to employees, except the General<br />

Manager, are within the purview <strong>of</strong> the General Manager, with the<br />

following exceptions:<br />

i. Any decisions that affect the initial contract for<br />

employment, the salary, or the removal <strong>of</strong> an individual<br />

from any managing director senior management position<br />

shall be approved by resolution <strong>of</strong> the Executive <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

ii. Settlement packages that exceed $100,000 related to the<br />

termination <strong>of</strong> employment contracts shall be approved<br />

by resolution <strong>of</strong> the Executive <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

By-Law #4:<br />

1.01 Definitions<br />

(11) “Senior Manager Managing Director” means any the most<br />

senior employees reporting directly to the General Manger, who are<br />

responsible for directing overseeing various administrative and<br />

operational units within the Corporation to achieve the strategic<br />

direction set by the Executive <strong>Council</strong> and <strong>Council</strong>.<br />

Be it further resolved that, all other references in the By-Laws to "Senior Manager" be<br />

replaced by "Managing Director."<br />

9


<strong>Minutes</strong> <strong>of</strong> the 12/13 <strong>Council</strong> 4th Meeting October 24, 2012<br />

LESARGE/Prabhu/Carried. C12/13.4.4<br />

14. COUNCIL BUSINESS<br />

15. MATTERS ARISING FROM EXECUTIVE COUNCIL MINUTES<br />

16. QUESTION PERIOD<br />

Could <strong>Council</strong> be provided with an update at the next meeting on the use <strong>of</strong> the Student<br />

Legacy Challenge funds in regards to the <strong>Council</strong>lor Lounge<br />

Fearnall responded that the <strong>Council</strong>lor Lounge was being converted into a meeting room<br />

and work space as well as an <strong>of</strong>fice space for the Speaker <strong>of</strong> <strong>Council</strong> as they had wanted<br />

to get rid <strong>of</strong> the perception <strong>of</strong> <strong>Council</strong>lors lounging and watching television in the <strong>USC</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong>fice and because <strong>Council</strong>lors need a place to meet and work.<br />

Were the furnishings and the X-Box that were in this space sold<br />

Fearnall advised that the furnishings that were in the room had been re-purposed and the<br />

X-Box was stolen from the room last year.<br />

<strong>Council</strong> voted on the use <strong>of</strong> Legacy Challenge funds for this lounge. Why was it changed<br />

without consultation with <strong>Council</strong><br />

The Speaker responded that the original purpose <strong>of</strong> the room was to provide meeting and<br />

work space for <strong>Council</strong>lors; however, when the <strong>USC</strong> received a free X-Box the focus was<br />

changed. Fearnall added that COCOA had requested that the space be used as a meeting<br />

space.<br />

17. NEW BUSINESS<br />

18. ADJOURNMENT<br />

Motion to adjourn.<br />

Charles/Zhu (M.)/Carried<br />

The meeting adjourned at 12:10 a.m.<br />

President<br />

10


<strong>Minutes</strong> <strong>of</strong> the 12/13 <strong>Council</strong> 4th Meeting October 24, 2012<br />

Recording Secretary<br />

Approved on: January 23, 2013<br />

Sign In/Sign Out<br />

Name Time In Time Out<br />

Bhatia, Meghan 6:55<br />

Brown, Spencer 7:10<br />

Hartley, Rebecca 9:24<br />

Pilo, Nikki 9:24<br />

Camilleri, Jordan 7:20<br />

Yeung, Spencer 6:50 12:09<br />

Li, Qingning 6:50 12:10<br />

Mabtoul, Karima 6:50 12:10<br />

Zhu, Maggie 6:50 12:10<br />

Lafortune 6:50 12:10<br />

Bitondo, Dominic 12:10<br />

Paulseth, Atle 12:10<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!