Air Traffic Management Concept Baseline Definition - The Boeing ...
Air Traffic Management Concept Baseline Definition - The Boeing ... Air Traffic Management Concept Baseline Definition - The Boeing ...
(i.e., Great Circle tracks) have been introduced progressively to save fuel and time by avoiding the inherent detours of fixed routes (e.g., National Route Program and random routes/User Preferred Trajectories). Fixed track routings have been retained where the traffic distribution must be kept simple and/or the number of crossing points in a sector kept well defined. 5.3.4 Landing and Surface Operations The ILS navigation aids (i.e., localizer and glide slope) provides lateral (from 25 nm out) and vertical guidance (from 10 nm out) to the runway. Marker beacons or DME navaids indicate the distance to the runway threshold. Precision Approach Minimums range from CAT I to CAT III operations as a function of Decision Height (DH) and Runway Visual Range (RVR). CAT I requires 200 feet DH and 1800 to 2400 feet RVR minima depending on lighting system and airplane speed category, CAT III requires a DH between 0 and 50 feet and an RVR from not less than 700 feet (CAT IIIA) to not less than 150 feet (CAT IIIB). The ILS performance is limited in some areas by FM frequency interference, in-band congestion, and siting limitations (an ILS site requires the surrounding terrain to be flat so that signal characteristics are not distorted). Hence, the Microwave Landing System was developed to the same performance requirements as ILS. The FAA’s MLS development contract ran into production problems in the late 1980s and was later canceled. It has been replaced with the Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS) program which is a GPS-based landing system augmented with ground augmentation aids. LAAS performance will include coverage for multiple runways or airports in a regions. Airplane avionics are being developed to carry a Multi-Mode Receiver (MMR) able to interface the crew controls and displays with one of several receivers, either ILS, MLS or GPS Landing System (GLS). 5.4 Surveillance 5.4.1 Summary of Surveillance Evolution The current surveillance system is based on the use of redundant primary and secondary (beacon) radars. The role that ground based radars play may be gradually diminished as GPS-based ADS 1 systems become available. The evolution to next generation surveillance is complicated by interoperability and compatibility with current systems in use. Two principles which limit available options for next generation systems are: • Compatibility with current secondary radar systems, i.e. Mode A/ C/ S • Interoperability with current TCAS collision avoidance systems and next generation Cockpit Display of Traffic Information (CDTI)-based air/air surveillance and situation awareness 1 In this section ADS is referred to in a generic sense rather than as a specific implementation. In this sense, Mode-S Specific Services, Mode-S extended squitter broadcast and contract based ADS as defined by RTCA DO-212 represent specific implementations of ADS technology. 80
The near future will probably see a mix of radar and ADS technologies which will be integrated and fused at the major ATC centers, providing high integrity and high accuracy surveillance based on multiple sensor inputs. The value that ADS methodology adds to surveillance is not limited to radar monitoring capability, however. With ADS it is possible to downlink extended surveillance information related to aircraft intent, and other data such as current winds aloft which are useful for predicting aircraft paths. The ability to fly flexible routings, for example, may depend on knowing validated and accurate path intent, as well as the ability to monitor current position and velocity states. The value of ADS broadcast (ADS-B) for air/air surveillance and airborne separation assurance is yet to be evaluated. However, this technology will certainly play a role in areas where radar surveillance is uneconomic or not feasible. Dual mode CDTI/TCAS systems will be in use in the near future for oceanic and remote area applications such as In-Trail Climb/Descent and for increased safety in non-radar airspace. CDTI will also play a role in the congested terminal areas of major hub airports providing additional safety and operational capabilities for equipped aircraft, as discussed in Sections 3 and 6. The sections below summarize the evolution of surveillance for surface, terminal area, en route, and oceanic operations. The emphasis of these sections is on the evolution of air/ground surveillance since the primary responsibility for separation assurance will remain with ground-based systems in the near term evolution of the NAS airspace system. A possible evolution path for air/air surveillance and CDTI is then summarized. 5.4.2 Airport Surface Surveillance Airport surface surveillance includes monitoring and display of the movements of all vehicles on controlled areas such as taxiways and runways, and providing sensor inputs for surface movement and incursion alert automation systems. Figure 5.10 shows the probable evolution of surface surveillance from current radar-based monitoring systems to multi-sensor radar/ADS-B systems. The dotted arrows in the figure denote evolutionary upgrade paths, while the solid line arrows denote inputs from sensors to automation systems. The older generation of ASDE-2 radars is currently being phased out and newer generation ASDE-3 primary radars are being installed at 40 of the biggest hub airports in the U.S. The ASDE-3 display system will then be upgraded by Airport Movement Area Safety System (AMASS) software for automated incursion alert. Two major problems with the ASDE-3 systems are the cost of installing and maintaining the radars, and the lack of aircraft/vehicle ID for surface movement, guidance & control. At the larger hub airports, ADS-B systems will be integrated with the ASDE radars to provide aircraft/vehicle ID, and to provide a backup sensor for radar failures. At smaller airports, ADS-B ground systems will provide a less expensive means of surface surveillance for equipped aircraft and surface vehicles. The AMASS automation software will evolve into Surface Movement Guidance and Control Systems, for comprehensive surface guidance & control to maximize airport capacity during peak periods, while maintaining adequate safety for airport surface operations. 81
- Page 41 and 42: • Sector-level flow planning Each
- Page 43 and 44: • Flow managers Figure 3.3 shows
- Page 45 and 46: traffic situation as it currently a
- Page 47 and 48: • It is probable that the process
- Page 49 and 50: 3.3. Event-based trajectory deviati
- Page 51 and 52: egion takes on the order of years t
- Page 53 and 54: The answer to this question is like
- Page 55 and 56: Flight Schedule Flight Planning Fil
- Page 57 and 58: 4 Human Factors This section addres
- Page 59 and 60: 4.2.3 Human Factors Support For Imp
- Page 61 and 62: “System designers, regulators, an
- Page 63 and 64: arbitrating wherever intents confli
- Page 65 and 66: aircraft-to-aircraft separation res
- Page 67 and 68: 5 Available and Emerging Technology
- Page 69 and 70: function of all the ICPs of element
- Page 71 and 72: A key concept in the definition of
- Page 73 and 74: contrast, the older radars have azi
- Page 75 and 76: Broadcast (ADS-B), V6.0). Individua
- Page 77 and 78: is needed to develop cockpit displa
- Page 79 and 80: ATC Voice Procedures Waypoint Repor
- Page 81 and 82: CPC = Controller Pilot Communicatio
- Page 83 and 84: TWDL = Two-Way Data Link CPDLC = Co
- Page 85 and 86: the ATN ADS specification. This wil
- Page 87 and 88: The airlines and the FAA have recen
- Page 89 and 90: menu associated with the airport of
- Page 91: 8.0 NM 4.0 NM POPP PLMN 14.0 NM 30.
- Page 95 and 96: ASR/SSR Radar Terminal Automation S
- Page 97 and 98: ASR/SSR Radar Mosaic Based (Host) T
- Page 99 and 100: Another group of users which can be
- Page 101 and 102: and human factor elements in all fo
- Page 103 and 104: ASOS AWOS TDWR NEXRAD Surface Upper
- Page 105 and 106: sets as legitimate atmospheric data
- Page 107 and 108: AWIPS/WFO- Advanced WARP Analysis P
- Page 109 and 110: longer-term domestic and internatio
- Page 111 and 112: example, the ceiling and visibility
- Page 113 and 114: WARP TWIP ITWS CWIN Information Dis
- Page 115 and 116: Constraints modeling can be perform
- Page 117 and 118: Figure 6.4 shows a template for ill
- Page 119 and 120: National Level. Improved Traffic Fl
- Page 121 and 122: of flight plan management and mediu
- Page 123 and 124: The component of the spacing buffer
- Page 125 and 126: 6.2.5 NAS Surface Figure 6.9 shows
- Page 127 and 128: trades involved in this step will r
- Page 129 and 130: exchange of traffic rights.” (Don
- Page 131 and 132: above, the agency’s organizationa
- Page 133 and 134: concepts under consideration for th
- Page 135 and 136: 1.2.4. A coordinated traffic flow p
- Page 137 and 138: Concepts Requirements Trades Evalua
- Page 139 and 140: 2. Intent: The research area identi
- Page 141 and 142: Acknowledgments The Boeing team wor
<strong>The</strong> near future will probably see a mix of radar and ADS technologies which will be<br />
integrated and fused at the major ATC centers, providing high integrity and high accuracy<br />
surveillance based on multiple sensor inputs.<br />
<strong>The</strong> value that ADS methodology adds to surveillance is not limited to radar monitoring<br />
capability, however. With ADS it is possible to downlink extended surveillance<br />
information related to aircraft intent, and other data such as current winds aloft which are<br />
useful for predicting aircraft paths. <strong>The</strong> ability to fly flexible routings, for example, may<br />
depend on knowing validated and accurate path intent, as well as the ability to monitor<br />
current position and velocity states.<br />
<strong>The</strong> value of ADS broadcast (ADS-B) for air/air surveillance and airborne separation<br />
assurance is yet to be evaluated. However, this technology will certainly play a role in<br />
areas where radar surveillance is uneconomic or not feasible. Dual mode CDTI/TCAS<br />
systems will be in use in the near future for oceanic and remote area applications such as<br />
In-Trail Climb/Descent and for increased safety in non-radar airspace. CDTI will also play<br />
a role in the congested terminal areas of major hub airports providing additional safety and<br />
operational capabilities for equipped aircraft, as discussed in Sections 3 and 6.<br />
<strong>The</strong> sections below summarize the evolution of surveillance for surface, terminal area, en<br />
route, and oceanic operations. <strong>The</strong> emphasis of these sections is on the evolution of<br />
air/ground surveillance since the primary responsibility for separation assurance will<br />
remain with ground-based systems in the near term evolution of the NAS airspace system.<br />
A possible evolution path for air/air surveillance and CDTI is then summarized.<br />
5.4.2 <strong>Air</strong>port Surface Surveillance<br />
<strong>Air</strong>port surface surveillance includes monitoring and display of the movements of all<br />
vehicles on controlled areas such as taxiways and runways, and providing sensor inputs for<br />
surface movement and incursion alert automation systems. Figure 5.10 shows the<br />
probable evolution of surface surveillance from current radar-based monitoring systems to<br />
multi-sensor radar/ADS-B systems. <strong>The</strong> dotted arrows in the figure denote evolutionary<br />
upgrade paths, while the solid line arrows denote inputs from sensors to automation<br />
systems. <strong>The</strong> older generation of ASDE-2 radars is currently being phased out and newer<br />
generation ASDE-3 primary radars are being installed at 40 of the biggest hub airports in<br />
the U.S. <strong>The</strong> ASDE-3 display system will then be upgraded by <strong>Air</strong>port Movement Area<br />
Safety System (AMASS) software for automated incursion alert. Two major problems<br />
with the ASDE-3 systems are the cost of installing and maintaining the radars, and the lack<br />
of aircraft/vehicle ID for surface movement, guidance & control. At the larger hub<br />
airports, ADS-B systems will be integrated with the ASDE radars to provide<br />
aircraft/vehicle ID, and to provide a backup sensor for radar failures. At smaller airports,<br />
ADS-B ground systems will provide a less expensive means of surface surveillance for<br />
equipped aircraft and surface vehicles. <strong>The</strong> AMASS automation software will evolve into<br />
Surface Movement Guidance and Control Systems, for comprehensive surface guidance &<br />
control to maximize airport capacity during peak periods, while maintaining adequate<br />
safety for airport surface operations.<br />
81