Air Traffic Management Concept Baseline Definition - The Boeing ...

Air Traffic Management Concept Baseline Definition - The Boeing ... Air Traffic Management Concept Baseline Definition - The Boeing ...

catsr.ite.gmu.edu
from catsr.ite.gmu.edu More from this publisher
02.01.2015 Views

(i.e., Great Circle tracks) have been introduced progressively to save fuel and time by avoiding the inherent detours of fixed routes (e.g., National Route Program and random routes/User Preferred Trajectories). Fixed track routings have been retained where the traffic distribution must be kept simple and/or the number of crossing points in a sector kept well defined. 5.3.4 Landing and Surface Operations The ILS navigation aids (i.e., localizer and glide slope) provides lateral (from 25 nm out) and vertical guidance (from 10 nm out) to the runway. Marker beacons or DME navaids indicate the distance to the runway threshold. Precision Approach Minimums range from CAT I to CAT III operations as a function of Decision Height (DH) and Runway Visual Range (RVR). CAT I requires 200 feet DH and 1800 to 2400 feet RVR minima depending on lighting system and airplane speed category, CAT III requires a DH between 0 and 50 feet and an RVR from not less than 700 feet (CAT IIIA) to not less than 150 feet (CAT IIIB). The ILS performance is limited in some areas by FM frequency interference, in-band congestion, and siting limitations (an ILS site requires the surrounding terrain to be flat so that signal characteristics are not distorted). Hence, the Microwave Landing System was developed to the same performance requirements as ILS. The FAA’s MLS development contract ran into production problems in the late 1980s and was later canceled. It has been replaced with the Local Area Augmentation System (LAAS) program which is a GPS-based landing system augmented with ground augmentation aids. LAAS performance will include coverage for multiple runways or airports in a regions. Airplane avionics are being developed to carry a Multi-Mode Receiver (MMR) able to interface the crew controls and displays with one of several receivers, either ILS, MLS or GPS Landing System (GLS). 5.4 Surveillance 5.4.1 Summary of Surveillance Evolution The current surveillance system is based on the use of redundant primary and secondary (beacon) radars. The role that ground based radars play may be gradually diminished as GPS-based ADS 1 systems become available. The evolution to next generation surveillance is complicated by interoperability and compatibility with current systems in use. Two principles which limit available options for next generation systems are: • Compatibility with current secondary radar systems, i.e. Mode A/ C/ S • Interoperability with current TCAS collision avoidance systems and next generation Cockpit Display of Traffic Information (CDTI)-based air/air surveillance and situation awareness 1 In this section ADS is referred to in a generic sense rather than as a specific implementation. In this sense, Mode-S Specific Services, Mode-S extended squitter broadcast and contract based ADS as defined by RTCA DO-212 represent specific implementations of ADS technology. 80

The near future will probably see a mix of radar and ADS technologies which will be integrated and fused at the major ATC centers, providing high integrity and high accuracy surveillance based on multiple sensor inputs. The value that ADS methodology adds to surveillance is not limited to radar monitoring capability, however. With ADS it is possible to downlink extended surveillance information related to aircraft intent, and other data such as current winds aloft which are useful for predicting aircraft paths. The ability to fly flexible routings, for example, may depend on knowing validated and accurate path intent, as well as the ability to monitor current position and velocity states. The value of ADS broadcast (ADS-B) for air/air surveillance and airborne separation assurance is yet to be evaluated. However, this technology will certainly play a role in areas where radar surveillance is uneconomic or not feasible. Dual mode CDTI/TCAS systems will be in use in the near future for oceanic and remote area applications such as In-Trail Climb/Descent and for increased safety in non-radar airspace. CDTI will also play a role in the congested terminal areas of major hub airports providing additional safety and operational capabilities for equipped aircraft, as discussed in Sections 3 and 6. The sections below summarize the evolution of surveillance for surface, terminal area, en route, and oceanic operations. The emphasis of these sections is on the evolution of air/ground surveillance since the primary responsibility for separation assurance will remain with ground-based systems in the near term evolution of the NAS airspace system. A possible evolution path for air/air surveillance and CDTI is then summarized. 5.4.2 Airport Surface Surveillance Airport surface surveillance includes monitoring and display of the movements of all vehicles on controlled areas such as taxiways and runways, and providing sensor inputs for surface movement and incursion alert automation systems. Figure 5.10 shows the probable evolution of surface surveillance from current radar-based monitoring systems to multi-sensor radar/ADS-B systems. The dotted arrows in the figure denote evolutionary upgrade paths, while the solid line arrows denote inputs from sensors to automation systems. The older generation of ASDE-2 radars is currently being phased out and newer generation ASDE-3 primary radars are being installed at 40 of the biggest hub airports in the U.S. The ASDE-3 display system will then be upgraded by Airport Movement Area Safety System (AMASS) software for automated incursion alert. Two major problems with the ASDE-3 systems are the cost of installing and maintaining the radars, and the lack of aircraft/vehicle ID for surface movement, guidance & control. At the larger hub airports, ADS-B systems will be integrated with the ASDE radars to provide aircraft/vehicle ID, and to provide a backup sensor for radar failures. At smaller airports, ADS-B ground systems will provide a less expensive means of surface surveillance for equipped aircraft and surface vehicles. The AMASS automation software will evolve into Surface Movement Guidance and Control Systems, for comprehensive surface guidance & control to maximize airport capacity during peak periods, while maintaining adequate safety for airport surface operations. 81

<strong>The</strong> near future will probably see a mix of radar and ADS technologies which will be<br />

integrated and fused at the major ATC centers, providing high integrity and high accuracy<br />

surveillance based on multiple sensor inputs.<br />

<strong>The</strong> value that ADS methodology adds to surveillance is not limited to radar monitoring<br />

capability, however. With ADS it is possible to downlink extended surveillance<br />

information related to aircraft intent, and other data such as current winds aloft which are<br />

useful for predicting aircraft paths. <strong>The</strong> ability to fly flexible routings, for example, may<br />

depend on knowing validated and accurate path intent, as well as the ability to monitor<br />

current position and velocity states.<br />

<strong>The</strong> value of ADS broadcast (ADS-B) for air/air surveillance and airborne separation<br />

assurance is yet to be evaluated. However, this technology will certainly play a role in<br />

areas where radar surveillance is uneconomic or not feasible. Dual mode CDTI/TCAS<br />

systems will be in use in the near future for oceanic and remote area applications such as<br />

In-Trail Climb/Descent and for increased safety in non-radar airspace. CDTI will also play<br />

a role in the congested terminal areas of major hub airports providing additional safety and<br />

operational capabilities for equipped aircraft, as discussed in Sections 3 and 6.<br />

<strong>The</strong> sections below summarize the evolution of surveillance for surface, terminal area, en<br />

route, and oceanic operations. <strong>The</strong> emphasis of these sections is on the evolution of<br />

air/ground surveillance since the primary responsibility for separation assurance will<br />

remain with ground-based systems in the near term evolution of the NAS airspace system.<br />

A possible evolution path for air/air surveillance and CDTI is then summarized.<br />

5.4.2 <strong>Air</strong>port Surface Surveillance<br />

<strong>Air</strong>port surface surveillance includes monitoring and display of the movements of all<br />

vehicles on controlled areas such as taxiways and runways, and providing sensor inputs for<br />

surface movement and incursion alert automation systems. Figure 5.10 shows the<br />

probable evolution of surface surveillance from current radar-based monitoring systems to<br />

multi-sensor radar/ADS-B systems. <strong>The</strong> dotted arrows in the figure denote evolutionary<br />

upgrade paths, while the solid line arrows denote inputs from sensors to automation<br />

systems. <strong>The</strong> older generation of ASDE-2 radars is currently being phased out and newer<br />

generation ASDE-3 primary radars are being installed at 40 of the biggest hub airports in<br />

the U.S. <strong>The</strong> ASDE-3 display system will then be upgraded by <strong>Air</strong>port Movement Area<br />

Safety System (AMASS) software for automated incursion alert. Two major problems<br />

with the ASDE-3 systems are the cost of installing and maintaining the radars, and the lack<br />

of aircraft/vehicle ID for surface movement, guidance & control. At the larger hub<br />

airports, ADS-B systems will be integrated with the ASDE radars to provide<br />

aircraft/vehicle ID, and to provide a backup sensor for radar failures. At smaller airports,<br />

ADS-B ground systems will provide a less expensive means of surface surveillance for<br />

equipped aircraft and surface vehicles. <strong>The</strong> AMASS automation software will evolve into<br />

Surface Movement Guidance and Control Systems, for comprehensive surface guidance &<br />

control to maximize airport capacity during peak periods, while maintaining adequate<br />

safety for airport surface operations.<br />

81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!