Air Traffic Management Concept Baseline Definition - The Boeing ...
Air Traffic Management Concept Baseline Definition - The Boeing ... Air Traffic Management Concept Baseline Definition - The Boeing ...
It is probable, in light traffic conditions, that certain conflicts could be delegated to pilots to resolve without maneuver restriction. But in heavy traffic conditions, restrictions would need to be imposed on available strategies in order to prevent a ripple effect on other aircraft. Once again, unless significant information and suitable support systems are provided to the pilot, the initiative for limiting maneuvers must be provided by someone with an overview of the situation. It is likely that the controller must continue to provide such oversight. In this case, the expectation of aircraft-based separation in anything but the least dense traffic scenarios must be seriously questioned. Any issue that affects the roles of pilots or controllers as well as the tasks they perform to execute those roles needs to have the human factors issues carefully considered in order to prevent unwanted side effects. 54
5 Available and Emerging Technology 5.1 Introduction 5.1.1 System Performance To achieve reduced airplane separations in part requires a formal definition of system performance that encompasses improved communications, navigation and surveillance performance. In addition, a formal characterization is required of the airspace environment (e.g., airspace configuration, traffic characteristics, available functionality, procedures definitions) for both nominal and rare-normal performance (e.g., failure modes, temporary constraints such as weather, etc.). Experience has shown the need for a formal definition of system performance. For example, more precise departure and approach paths and direct routings for improved airspace operations were expected with the introduction of area navigation technology such as that introduced in the initial 757/67 aircraft fielded in 1982. A more complete characterization of systems capabilities and features (i.e., the airplane operating environment and air traffic infrastructure) since 1982 has led to incremental step benefits. Total system performance characterization of the primary variables enables the higher level of performance and closer permitted separation. The proposed definitions of the required performance components for navigation, communication and surveillance are summarized in the following paragraphs. RNP has been adopted by the ICAO Required General Concept of Separation Panel (RGCSP) and All-Weather Operations Panel (AWOP), implemented in the Boeing 737, 747, 777 models (757/767 will be certified in early 1998), and is ready for initial operational approval. RCP and Required Monitoring Performance (RMP) are in various stages of development. These performance definitions can be combined in many ways to support the reduction of buffer regions in airplane separation. However, the identification of Required System Performance must find a practical set of CNS capabilities that address operational needs in a way that provides intended efficiency while maintaining or increasing safety. To illustrate the objective of RSP, one can conceive a protection volume around the airplane, whose size depends on the dimensions of the combined communication, navigation, surveillance performance, and synthesizes into an RSP performance characterization. 5.1.2 Communication Performance Airplane communication requirements for each phase of flight are a function of the controller-pilot communication needs. These vary greatly with traffic complexity and density, the weather conditions, the controller’s needs to issue clearances and vector the airplane or simply to establish contact with the crew. Increased communication performance will be provided through air/ground data link communications integrated into the Aeronautical Telecommunication Network (ATN) to complement the current voice communications means. This evolution to more data communications together with increased flexibility in the use of communication 55
- Page 15 and 16: unknown technology, and thus the co
- Page 17 and 18: 2 The NAS ATM System Development Pr
- Page 19 and 20: System Requirements & Objectives Va
- Page 21 and 22: technologies needed for initial tra
- Page 23 and 24: • The goals of various users are
- Page 25 and 26: considerations are key to evaluatin
- Page 27 and 28: Free Flight White Paper on System C
- Page 29 and 30: 4.5 4.3 4 3.7 Current NAS Future NA
- Page 31 and 32: elated component will increase with
- Page 33 and 34: Special Committees. The paper, with
- Page 35 and 36: efficiency-constraints model that i
- Page 37 and 38: • Problem Statement • Alternati
- Page 39 and 40: • The highly peaked nature of air
- Page 41 and 42: • Sector-level flow planning Each
- Page 43 and 44: • Flow managers Figure 3.3 shows
- Page 45 and 46: traffic situation as it currently a
- Page 47 and 48: • It is probable that the process
- Page 49 and 50: 3.3. Event-based trajectory deviati
- Page 51 and 52: egion takes on the order of years t
- Page 53 and 54: The answer to this question is like
- Page 55 and 56: Flight Schedule Flight Planning Fil
- Page 57 and 58: 4 Human Factors This section addres
- Page 59 and 60: 4.2.3 Human Factors Support For Imp
- Page 61 and 62: “System designers, regulators, an
- Page 63 and 64: arbitrating wherever intents confli
- Page 65: aircraft-to-aircraft separation res
- Page 69 and 70: function of all the ICPs of element
- Page 71 and 72: A key concept in the definition of
- Page 73 and 74: contrast, the older radars have azi
- Page 75 and 76: Broadcast (ADS-B), V6.0). Individua
- Page 77 and 78: is needed to develop cockpit displa
- Page 79 and 80: ATC Voice Procedures Waypoint Repor
- Page 81 and 82: CPC = Controller Pilot Communicatio
- Page 83 and 84: TWDL = Two-Way Data Link CPDLC = Co
- Page 85 and 86: the ATN ADS specification. This wil
- Page 87 and 88: The airlines and the FAA have recen
- Page 89 and 90: menu associated with the airport of
- Page 91 and 92: 8.0 NM 4.0 NM POPP PLMN 14.0 NM 30.
- Page 93 and 94: The near future will probably see a
- Page 95 and 96: ASR/SSR Radar Terminal Automation S
- Page 97 and 98: ASR/SSR Radar Mosaic Based (Host) T
- Page 99 and 100: Another group of users which can be
- Page 101 and 102: and human factor elements in all fo
- Page 103 and 104: ASOS AWOS TDWR NEXRAD Surface Upper
- Page 105 and 106: sets as legitimate atmospheric data
- Page 107 and 108: AWIPS/WFO- Advanced WARP Analysis P
- Page 109 and 110: longer-term domestic and internatio
- Page 111 and 112: example, the ceiling and visibility
- Page 113 and 114: WARP TWIP ITWS CWIN Information Dis
- Page 115 and 116: Constraints modeling can be perform
5 Available and Emerging Technology<br />
5.1 Introduction<br />
5.1.1 System Performance<br />
To achieve reduced airplane separations in part requires a formal definition of system<br />
performance that encompasses improved communications, navigation and surveillance<br />
performance. In addition, a formal characterization is required of the airspace environment<br />
(e.g., airspace configuration, traffic characteristics, available functionality, procedures<br />
definitions) for both nominal and rare-normal performance (e.g., failure modes, temporary<br />
constraints such as weather, etc.).<br />
Experience has shown the need for a formal definition of system performance. For<br />
example, more precise departure and approach paths and direct routings for improved<br />
airspace operations were expected with the introduction of area navigation technology<br />
such as that introduced in the initial 757/67 aircraft fielded in 1982. A more complete<br />
characterization of systems capabilities and features (i.e., the airplane operating<br />
environment and air traffic infrastructure) since 1982 has led to incremental step benefits.<br />
Total system performance characterization of the primary variables enables the higher level<br />
of performance and closer permitted separation.<br />
<strong>The</strong> proposed definitions of the required performance components for navigation,<br />
communication and surveillance are summarized in the following paragraphs. RNP has<br />
been adopted by the ICAO Required General <strong>Concept</strong> of Separation Panel (RGCSP) and<br />
All-Weather Operations Panel (AWOP), implemented in the <strong>Boeing</strong> 737, 747, 777 models<br />
(757/767 will be certified in early 1998), and is ready for initial operational approval. RCP<br />
and Required Monitoring Performance (RMP) are in various stages of development.<br />
<strong>The</strong>se performance definitions can be combined in many ways to support the reduction of<br />
buffer regions in airplane separation. However, the identification of Required System<br />
Performance must find a practical set of CNS capabilities that address operational needs in<br />
a way that provides intended efficiency while maintaining or increasing safety. To<br />
illustrate the objective of RSP, one can conceive a protection volume around the airplane,<br />
whose size depends on the dimensions of the combined communication, navigation,<br />
surveillance performance, and synthesizes into an RSP performance characterization.<br />
5.1.2 Communication Performance<br />
<strong>Air</strong>plane communication requirements for each phase of flight are a function of the<br />
controller-pilot communication needs. <strong>The</strong>se vary greatly with traffic complexity and<br />
density, the weather conditions, the controller’s needs to issue clearances and vector the<br />
airplane or simply to establish contact with the crew.<br />
Increased communication performance will be provided through air/ground data link<br />
communications integrated into the Aeronautical Telecommunication Network (ATN) to<br />
complement the current voice communications means. This evolution to more data<br />
communications together with increased flexibility in the use of communication<br />
55