Air Traffic Management Concept Baseline Definition - The Boeing ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table C-1 Comparison of FAA 2005 and Users’ 2005 Operational Concepts En-Route FAA 2005 User 2005 Overview En route airspace structures and boundary restrictions are unconstrained by communications and computer systems, and aircraft are no longer required to fly directly between navaids along routes Accommodation of User preferences for trajectories, schedule and flight sequence - based on decision support tools for Conflict detection, resolution and flow management. Flexible airspace structure (Probably daily! Potentially several times per day) adjustment of structure to meet predicted flows. Route structure the exception not the rule. Surveillance includes aircraft broadcast GNSS positions. Automated inter/intra facility coordination and communications. NAS Wide info. system continually updated. Routine pilot - controller comms. via datalink. Potential for separation minima to be reduced - dependent on aircraft equipage. Better w/x predictions available to all users (based on real-time reporting). Greater accommodation of user requests, including carrier preferences on the sequencing of their arrival aircraft. Facility boundaries are adjusted to accommodate dynamic changes in airspace structure. Accommodation of User preferences for trajectories, schedule and flight sequence - based on decision support tools for Conflict detection, resolution and flow management. Flexible airspace structure (Probably daily! Potentially several times per day) adjustment of structure to meet predicted flows. Route structure the exception not the rule. Surveillance includes aircraft broadcast GNSS positions. Automated inter/intra facility coordination and communications. NAS Wide info. system continually updated. Routine pilot - controller comms. via datalink. Better w/x predictions available to all users (based on real-time reporting). Moving map displays - reduces CFIT. Cross-border flight plan transfer (Mexico/Canada). A/c not equipped for all services will retain current level of service. Routes and procedures allow direct VFR flights through busy terminal areas Datalinking of NAS status data in-flight where required GNSS position used for surveillance drives enhanced conflict probing. 168
Table C-1 Comparison of FAA 2005 and Users’ 2005 Operational Concepts En-Route FAA 2005 User 2005 Separation assurance Traffic Flow Management Gaps Responsibility still with Service Provider. Changes to separation assurance function a result of increased decision support (conflict detection and resolution).. Availability of flight data for all flights. Improvements in separating controlled and uncontrolled flights and in VFR flight following service. Separation from SUA - activity info. availability allows more efficient planning of trajectories New role - Coordination of the dynamic changes to airspace structure. Better real-time information (airborne times) gives improved capabilities for strategic management. NAS info. available to all Users . Problem solving to change structure/flows a collaborative process involving Users. Use Conflict Detection tools of en-route control but with longer time horizon. Doesn’t cover benefits. Doesn’t talk of where capacity will come from. Doesn’t refer to separation assurance being transferred to pilot. Responsibility still with Service Provider. Reduced horizontal separation standards - in form of time-based separation. - provides more capacity. CDTI for more GA a/c enhances safety. Use of ground system enhanced conflict probe and alerting. Doesn’t cover much of the Ground System. Doesn’t refer to pilot taking over separation assurance role - even in specific circumstances Differences Covers Traffic Flow Management Doesn’t refer to Traffic Flow Management. Covers international aspects of flight plan transfer. Refers to VFR access to busy terminal airspace. Key Aspects Carrier preferences on the sequencing of their arrival aircraft Flexible airspace structure. Route structure only for high density periods. Facility boundaries are adjusted to accommodate dynamic changes in airspace structure. Automated inter/intra facility coordination and communication functions. Doesn’t refer to Free Flight. Doesn’t talk of separation assurance being vested with pilot. Refers to Ground Based Conflict Probe thus assumes separation assurance remains with Service provider. Covers international aspects of flight plan transfer 169
Page 1 and 2:
Air Traffic Management Concept Base
Page 3 and 4:
Executive Summary This report prese
Page 5 and 6:
Table of Contents 1 Introduction...
Page 7 and 8:
List of Figures 2.1 System Developm
Page 9 and 10:
Acronyms AAS AATT ACARS ACP ADF ADF
Page 11 and 12:
KIAS LAAS LAHSO LLWAS MAC MCP MDCRS
Page 13 and 14:
1 Introduction This report presents
Page 15 and 16:
unknown technology, and thus the co
Page 17 and 18:
2 The NAS ATM System Development Pr
Page 19 and 20:
System Requirements & Objectives Va
Page 21 and 22:
technologies needed for initial tra
Page 23 and 24:
• The goals of various users are
Page 25 and 26:
considerations are key to evaluatin
Page 27 and 28:
Free Flight White Paper on System C
Page 29 and 30:
4.5 4.3 4 3.7 Current NAS Future NA
Page 31 and 32:
elated component will increase with
Page 33 and 34:
Special Committees. The paper, with
Page 35 and 36:
efficiency-constraints model that i
Page 37 and 38:
• Problem Statement • Alternati
Page 39 and 40:
• The highly peaked nature of air
Page 41 and 42:
• Sector-level flow planning Each
Page 43 and 44:
• Flow managers Figure 3.3 shows
Page 45 and 46:
traffic situation as it currently a
Page 47 and 48:
• It is probable that the process
Page 49 and 50:
3.3. Event-based trajectory deviati
Page 51 and 52:
egion takes on the order of years t
Page 53 and 54:
The answer to this question is like
Page 55 and 56:
Flight Schedule Flight Planning Fil
Page 57 and 58:
4 Human Factors This section addres
Page 59 and 60:
4.2.3 Human Factors Support For Imp
Page 61 and 62:
“System designers, regulators, an
Page 63 and 64:
arbitrating wherever intents confli
Page 65 and 66:
aircraft-to-aircraft separation res
Page 67 and 68:
5 Available and Emerging Technology
Page 69 and 70:
function of all the ICPs of element
Page 71 and 72:
A key concept in the definition of
Page 73 and 74:
contrast, the older radars have azi
Page 75 and 76:
Broadcast (ADS-B), V6.0). Individua
Page 77 and 78:
is needed to develop cockpit displa
Page 79 and 80:
ATC Voice Procedures Waypoint Repor
Page 81 and 82:
CPC = Controller Pilot Communicatio
Page 83 and 84:
TWDL = Two-Way Data Link CPDLC = Co
Page 85 and 86:
the ATN ADS specification. This wil
Page 87 and 88:
The airlines and the FAA have recen
Page 89 and 90:
menu associated with the airport of
Page 91 and 92:
8.0 NM 4.0 NM POPP PLMN 14.0 NM 30.
Page 93 and 94:
The near future will probably see a
Page 95 and 96:
ASR/SSR Radar Terminal Automation S
Page 97 and 98:
ASR/SSR Radar Mosaic Based (Host) T
Page 99 and 100:
Another group of users which can be
Page 101 and 102:
and human factor elements in all fo
Page 103 and 104:
ASOS AWOS TDWR NEXRAD Surface Upper
Page 105 and 106:
sets as legitimate atmospheric data
Page 107 and 108:
AWIPS/WFO- Advanced WARP Analysis P
Page 109 and 110:
longer-term domestic and internatio
Page 111 and 112:
example, the ceiling and visibility
Page 113 and 114:
WARP TWIP ITWS CWIN Information Dis
Page 115 and 116:
Constraints modeling can be perform
Page 117 and 118:
Figure 6.4 shows a template for ill
Page 119 and 120:
National Level. Improved Traffic Fl
Page 121 and 122:
of flight plan management and mediu
Page 123 and 124:
The component of the spacing buffer
Page 125 and 126:
6.2.5 NAS Surface Figure 6.9 shows
Page 127 and 128:
trades involved in this step will r
Page 129 and 130: exchange of traffic rights.” (Don
Page 131 and 132: above, the agency’s organizationa
Page 133 and 134: concepts under consideration for th
Page 135 and 136: 1.2.4. A coordinated traffic flow p
Page 137 and 138: Concepts Requirements Trades Evalua
Page 139 and 140: 2. Intent: The research area identi
Page 141 and 142: Acknowledgments The Boeing team wor
Page 143 and 144: Eurocontrol (1996), Meeting Europe
Page 145 and 146: Schadt, J and Rockel, B. (1996),
Page 147 and 148: Warren, A.W. (1994), “A New Metho
Page 149 and 150: Table A-1 Communication Application
Page 151 and 152: Table A-3 Communication Media Techn
Page 153 and 154: A.2 Navigation The navigation techn
Page 155 and 156: Table A-5 Navigation Processors Pro
Page 157 and 158: standardized as VDL Mode-4. Both sy
Page 159 and 160: Table A-6 Surveillance Inventory Su
Page 161 and 162: Appendix B. Global Scenario Issue T
Page 163 and 164: Issue # 2: Some Limitations of Futu
Page 165 and 166: aviation. it was agreed that ICAO
Page 167 and 168: • IPT architecture efforts are li
Page 169 and 170: Terminal Replacement System (STARS)
Page 171 and 172: 5) Air Traffic Control: Complete an
Page 173 and 174: Appendix C. Comparison of FAA 2005
Page 175 and 176: Surface Movement Automation require
Page 177 and 178: Surface Movement Efficiency Table C
Page 179: Arrivals/ Departures Automation/ de
Page 183 and 184: Table C-1 Comparison of FAA 2005 an
Page 185 and 186: Appendix D. Transition Database Thi
Page 187 and 188: Enabler Grouping Number NAS5.1 NAS5
Page 189 and 190: Enabler Grouping Number Enabler Ena
Page 191 and 192: Table D-1 Enabler Grouping Number E
Page 193 and 194: Table D-1 Enabler Grouping Number E
Page 195 and 196: Appendix E. Constraints Model Traff
Page 197 and 198: Approach Configuration - Approach P
show all

Air Traffic Management Concept Baseline Definition - The Boeing ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?