Air Traffic Management Concept Baseline Definition - The Boeing ...
Air Traffic Management Concept Baseline Definition - The Boeing ...
Air Traffic Management Concept Baseline Definition - The Boeing ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
8 Conclusions and Recommendations<br />
8.1 Conclusions<br />
1. <strong>The</strong> traffic growth predictions presented in Section 2 indicate that as early as 2006<br />
the NAS will suffer serious traffic gridlock unless increased capacity is ensured.<br />
<strong>The</strong> terminal area is predicted to be the primary choke point in the system, with<br />
increasing congestion in some en route regions. This situation, if not addressed,<br />
will cause airline hubbing operations to become difficult, if not infeasible, with<br />
escalating costs which will constrain economic growth.<br />
2. <strong>The</strong> current approach to NAS modernization will not accommodate the predicted<br />
growth. This is primarily due to two factors:<br />
• <strong>The</strong> pace of the modernization is too slow to respond to market needs.<br />
• <strong>The</strong> system development process is inadequate, as it is largely technologydriven<br />
to point solutions, without traceability to clearly defined mission<br />
goals.<br />
8.2 Recommendations<br />
1. NAS capacity must be increased two to three fold through 2015. This is a<br />
challenging task, technically and economically, and will involve a combination of<br />
the following:<br />
1.1. Additional runways will be needed, either at existing hub or reliever<br />
airports or at new airports.<br />
1.2. Higher traffic density in terminal areas and the most congested en route<br />
regions will also be needed. <strong>The</strong> operational concept presented in this<br />
report proposes to achieve this through a combination of the following:<br />
1.2.1. Improvements in communications, navigation and surveillance<br />
technology to support reduced separations. This will be aimed at<br />
more accurate trajectory definition and execution, and better<br />
position and intent information for the separation assurance<br />
functions. A precision 4-D separation assurance framework,<br />
distinct from procedural or radar control, will emerge.<br />
1.2.2. Changes in the separation assurance functions to achieve the<br />
capacity goals. This will involve decision support tools for<br />
increased accuracy and productivity, along with an architecture that<br />
supports the required criticality of function for separation<br />
assurance.<br />
1.2.3. <strong>Air</strong>space configuration to support either high or low density<br />
operations through dynamic partitioning. Access to airspace will be<br />
based on aircraft capability, qualified to a maximum Required<br />
System Performance (RSP) level in which the aircraft can operate.<br />
122