01.01.2015 Views

ARTICLE 1: - emits - ESA

ARTICLE 1: - emits - ESA

ARTICLE 1: - emits - ESA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>ESA</strong>/REG/001, rev.2<br />

Annex III,rev.1<br />

Page 98<br />

6.5.3 The marks shall be a number between 0 (zero) and 100 (one hundred) for each<br />

criterion in accordance with the following scale:<br />

Perfect 100<br />

Excellent 90<br />

Very Good 75<br />

Good 60<br />

Fair 50<br />

Barely Acceptable 40<br />

Worthless 0<br />

6.5.4 Members shall restrict themselves to the indicated figures, but may if so<br />

authorised by the Chairperson award an intermediate mark by increments of 5 only if<br />

this would, to a significant extent, better reflect their judgment.<br />

6.5.5 Any member of a TEP, whose mark differ significantly from the average of the<br />

marks given by the other members of the TEP under any criterion (20 points or more)<br />

shall state specifically why he disagrees under that criterion, and the reason shall be<br />

recorded as “minority statement” in the TEP evaluation report.<br />

6.5.6 Unless the majority of the TEP members consider the tender unacceptable under<br />

any criterion, any member(s) of a TEP who give(s) a mark below 40 shall state<br />

specifically why he/they consider the tender unacceptable under that criterion, and the<br />

reason(s) shall be recorded as “minority statement” in the TEP evaluation report.<br />

6.5.7 When the Chairperson of the TEP is satisfied that further discussion will not lead<br />

to a reduction of any discrepancies, the marks shall be officially recorded on the<br />

marking sheets. Marks once thus recorded cannot be changed.<br />

6.6 Finalisation of the evaluation report<br />

6.6.1 Following the recording of the marks the TEP shall finalise its evaluation report<br />

and have it signed by all its members.<br />

6.6.2 In its report the TEP shall also identify the main items that would require<br />

negotiation with Tenderers prior to the placing of a contract and such findings shall be<br />

clearly identified.<br />

6.6.3 In all cases, the TEP may deem it appropriate to point out in its evaluation report<br />

the implications resulting from the choice of a given Tenderer, and may make any other<br />

remark it considers relevant to the evaluation.<br />

6.7 Submission of the evaluation report to the TEB and oral reports<br />

6.7.1 The TEP’s Chairperson shall submit the evaluation report to the Joint secretaries<br />

of the TEB for distribution to the TEB.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!