01.01.2015 Views

ARTICLE 1: - emits - ESA

ARTICLE 1: - emits - ESA

ARTICLE 1: - emits - ESA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>ESA</strong>/REG/001, rev. 2<br />

Annex III,rev.1<br />

Page 97<br />

Chapter 6: TEP’s responsibilities upon receipt of tenders or parts of<br />

6.1 Handling of the evaluation criteria established by the TEB<br />

For the purpose of assessment the TEP may break down the criteria and sub-criteria<br />

established by the TEB into further subdivisions but shall mark according to the criteria<br />

and sub-criteria as established by the TEB.<br />

6.2 Establishment of the calendar<br />

The TEP shall establish the calendar and schedule of its next meetings up to its<br />

evaluation report consistent with the overall schedule set for it by the TEB.<br />

6.3 Evaluation<br />

6.3.1 The TEP shall evaluate against the set of criteria defined by the TEB in the<br />

ITT/RFQ:<br />

i. the quality of the tender or part of against the requirements of the ITT/ RFQ.<br />

ii.<br />

whether the ITT/ RFQ requirements are complied with.<br />

6.3.2 The TEP shall identify the strengths and weaknesses of each tender in respect to<br />

the criteria This shall be done by comparing the tender with the ITT requirements, and<br />

not by comparing tenders among themselves.<br />

6.3.3 If a statement contained in a tender needs clarification, the procedure to be<br />

followed in such a case is the one described in Chapter 7.1 below.<br />

6.4 Discussion of findings<br />

6.4.1 Prior to the marking of tenders or part of the TEP shall discuss its findings on<br />

each aspect of a tender or part of.<br />

6.4.2 The TEP Chairperson shall guide the discussion in such a way that any significant<br />

difference of opinion may be reduced, and if this is not possible, then this is clearly<br />

identified and recorded.<br />

6.5 Marking<br />

6.5.1 The authorised TEP members following the discussion of findings shall award<br />

marks to each of the criteria and sub-criteria where appropriate.<br />

6.5.2 If a member marks one offer under a particular criterion, he shall mark all tenders<br />

under the said criterion.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!