ARTICLE 1: - emits - ESA

More documents

Recommendations

Info

<strong>ESA</strong>/REG/001, rev.2 Annex III,rev.1 Page 82 and can make an assessment. They shall not restrict themselves to criteria related to their professional specialty, or aspects of criteria related thereto. If a member marks one proposal under a particular criterion, he shall mark all proposals under the said criterion. 6.4.3 The marks shall be a number between 0 (zero) and 100 (one hundred) for each criterion in accordance with the following scale: Perfect 100 Excellent 90 Very Good 75 Good 60 Fair 50 Barely Acceptable 40 Worthless 0 6.4.4 Members shall restrict themselves to the indicated figures, but may if so authorised by the Chairperson award an intermediate mark by increments of 5 only if this would, to a significant extent, better reflect their judgment. 6.4.5 Any member of a TEB, whose mark differs significantly from the average of the marks given by the other members of the TEB under any criterion (20 points or more), shall state specifically why he disagrees under that criterion, and the reason shall be recorded as “minority statement” in the TEB report. 6.4.6 Unless the majority of the TEB members consider the proposal unacceptable under any criterion, any member(s) of a TEB who give(s) a mark below 40 shall state specifically why he/they consider the proposal unacceptable under that criterion, and the reason(s) shall be recorded as “minority statement” in the TEB report. 6.4.7 Where prior to the attribution of marks it was decided by the TEB to mark by consensus, any member who at the time of the marking cannot agree with the proposed consensus marking shall specifically state why he disagrees on which criterion, and this shall be recorded in the minutes by the Contract officer. In the latter case the marking shall be performed individually. 6.4.8 When the Chairperson of the TEB is satisfied that further discussion will not lead to a reduction of any discrepancies, the marks shall be officially recorded on the marking sheets. Marks once thus recorded cannot be changed. 6.5 Assessment of results following the marking 6.5.1 If as a result of the marking one or more proposal is marked acceptable (i.e. ≥ 40) under all evaluation criteria, the TEB shall:
<strong>ESA</strong>/REG/001, rev. 2 Annex III,rev.1 Page 83 i. eliminate the proposal(s) having received one or more mark below 40; ii. proceed in applying the weighting factors only to the proposal or those proposals marked acceptable under all evaluation criteria; iii. make its overall assessment and recommendation pursuant to paragraph 6.7 below; and, iv. finalise its final report and have it signed by all members. 6.5.2 If as a result of the marking all of the proposals received are marked below 40 under one or more criteria, the TEB shall not apply the weighting factors, close the evaluation and draw up its final report. In such a case: i. the Chairperson of the TEB shall submit the report to the Initiating Authority and to the Head of the local procurement division/service for decision on whether to re-issue the RFP; ii. The decision and the reasons therefore shall be recorded by the Contract officer in the contract file. 6.6 Application of weighting factors 6.6.1 Once the TEB has proceeded with its marking (paragraph 6.5.1 above) the TEB shall proceed in applying the weighting factors. 6.6.2 The result of such application will be weighted marks which shall also be filled into the marking sheets together with their respective aggregate for each proposal. 6.7 Overall assessment of proposals and finalisation of recommendation 6.7.1 Following the application of the weighting factors the TEB shall proceed with an overall assessment of the proposals taking into consideration: i. the weighted marks 30 , ii. when established in the RFP at the time of its issuing the industrial policy measures and/or the geographical return requirements , iii. any other requirements provided they were clearly indicated as such in the RFP. 6.7.2 The TEB Chairperson who is responsible for the correct proceedings of the board shall guide the discussion in such a way that any possible significant differences of opinion may be reduced, or if this is not possible, that they are clearly identified and recorded. 30 Where it is established in the Framework Agreement or in the RFP that no Work Order will be attributed to framework contractors the proposals of which have not obtained a certain overall weighted mark ( e.g ≥ 60) such proposals shall be eliminated from further evaluation.
Page 1 and 2:
ESA UNCLASSIFIED - Releasable to th
Page 3 and 4:
ESA/REG/001, rev.2 Page 3 EUROPEAN
Page 5 and 6:
ESA/REG/001, rev.2 Page 5 PART III
Page 7 and 8:
ESA/REG/001, rev.2 Page 7 ANNEXES I
Page 9 and 10:
ESA/REG/001, rev.2 Page 9 PART I: G
Page 11 and 12:
ESA/REG/001, rev.2 Page 11 Tender E
Page 13 and 14:
ESA/REG/001, rev.2 Page 13 ARTICLE
Page 15 and 16:
ESA/REG/001, rev.2 Page 15 3. The A
Page 17 and 18:
ESA/REG/001, rev.2 Page 17 by the A
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
ESA/REG/001, rev.2 Page 25 PART II:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
ESA/REG/001, rev.2 Page 29 If provi
Page 31 and 32:
ESA/REG/001, rev.2 Page 31 PART III
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
ESA/REG/001, rev.2 Page 39 PART IV
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
ESA/REG/001, rev.2 Page 43 2. For r
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
ESA/REG/001, rev.2 Page 51 10. When
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
ESA/REG/001, rev.2 Page 61 b) where
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
ESA/REG/001, rev.2 Page 65 PART VI:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
ESA/REG/001, rev.2 Page 77 PART VII
Page 79 and 80:
ESA/REG/001, rev.2 ANNEXES ANNEXES
Page 81 and 82:
ESA/REG/001, rev.2 Annex I,rev.1 AN
Page 83 and 84:
ESA/REG/001, rev.2 Annex I,rev.1 Pa
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
ESA/REG/001, rev.2 Annex II, rev.1
Page 95 and 96:
ESA/REG/001, rev.2 Annex II,rev.1 P
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
ESA/REG/001, rev.2 Annex III, rev.1
Page 105 and 106:
ESA/REG/001, rev. 2 Annex III,rev.1
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134: ESA/REG/001, rev. 2 Annex III,rev.1
Page 183: ESA/REG/001, rev. 2 Annex III,rev.1
Page 201: ESA/REG/001, rev. 2 Annex III,rev.1
Page 204 and 205: ESA/REG/001, rev.2 Annex IV Page 2
Page 206 and 207: ESA/REG/001, rev.2 Annex V,rev.1 Pa
Page 224 and 225: ESA/REG/001, rev.2 Annex VI,rev.1 P
Page 234 and 235:
ESA/REG/001, rev.2 Annex VI,rev.1 P
Page 236 and 237:
Page 238 and 239:
show all

ARTICLE 1: - emits - ESA

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?