01.01.2015 Views

ARTICLE 1: - emits - ESA

ARTICLE 1: - emits - ESA

ARTICLE 1: - emits - ESA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>ESA</strong>/REG/001, rev. 2<br />

Annex III,rev.1<br />

Page 63<br />

7.3 Discussion of findings<br />

7.3.1 Prior to the marking of the tender the TEB shall discuss its findings and that of the<br />

panel (s) if any, on each aspect of the tender.<br />

7.3.2 The TEB Chairperson shall guide the discussion in such a way that any significant<br />

difference of opinion may be reduced, and if this is not possible, then this is clearly<br />

identified and recorded.<br />

7.4 Marking of tender<br />

7.4.1 The TEB following its discussion of findings shall award marks to each of the<br />

criteria and sub-criteria where appropriate.<br />

7.4.2 The price as opposed to the credibility of cost shall not be marked.<br />

7.4.3 TEB members shall mark all criteria for which they have a general understanding<br />

and can make an assessment. They shall not restrict themselves to criteria related to<br />

their professional specialty, or aspects of criteria related thereto.<br />

7.4.4 The marks shall be a number between 0 (zero) and 100 (one hundred) for each<br />

criterion in accordance with the following scale:<br />

Perfect 100<br />

Excellent 90<br />

Very Good 75<br />

Good 60<br />

Fair 50<br />

Barely Acceptable 40<br />

Worthless 0<br />

7.4.5 Members shall restrict themselves to the indicated figures, but may if so<br />

authorised by the Chairperson award an intermediate mark by increments of 5 only if<br />

this would, to a significant extent, better reflect their judgment.<br />

7.4.6 Any member of a TEB, whose mark differs significantly from the average of the<br />

marks given by the other members of the TEB under any criterion (20 points or more)<br />

shall state specifically why he disagrees under that criterion, and the reason shall be<br />

recorded as “minority statement” in the TEB report.<br />

7.4.7 Unless the majority of the TEB members consider the tender unacceptable under<br />

any criterion, any member(s) of a TEB who give(s) a mark below 40 shall state<br />

specifically why he/they consider the tender unacceptable under that criterion, and the<br />

reason(s) shall be recorded as “minority statement” in the TEB report.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!