01.01.2015 Views

Pájaro River Watershed Flood Protection Plan - The Pajaro River ...

Pájaro River Watershed Flood Protection Plan - The Pajaro River ...

Pájaro River Watershed Flood Protection Plan - The Pajaro River ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1967 flight lines and the full digital 1998 federal digital orthophoto quadrangle<br />

series.<br />

We learned that there were three classes of change in the San Benito <strong>River</strong><br />

channel that all affect downstream flood peak heights. <strong>The</strong>re were two<br />

different kinds of land use changes that affect runoff timing and volume to the<br />

upper <strong>Pájaro</strong> channel derived from San Benito and Santa Clara counties. <strong>The</strong><br />

changes we document can be summarized in 5 classes as follows:<br />

1. Those where direct channel incision prevents or reduces overbank<br />

flood storage onto a floodplain along the river. Rather than model the<br />

degree of incision necessary to affect flood storage on floodplains, we<br />

simply noted abandoned floodplains recognized by soils and<br />

vegetation. This kind of change greatly accelerates passage of<br />

floodwaters downstream, except where the channel incision intercepts<br />

the groundwater surface and vegetation thus chokes the channel to<br />

slow water velocity.<br />

2. Those where channel widening with or without a deeper central<br />

channel (thalweg) effectively increase the capacity of a channel and<br />

thus reduce the height of a flood and access of those waters to their<br />

floodplain. This kind of change accelerates flood runoff because the<br />

water remains in the channel and flows at a higher velocity than would<br />

overbank floodplain flow.<br />

3. Those associated with a change from a multi-thread or braided<br />

channel to a single more efficient channel, often accompanied by<br />

reduced in-channel vegetation. This kind of change accompanies<br />

incision and is favored where a central channel is deliberately graded<br />

or confined to protect banks from erosion or to prevent lateral<br />

migration of the channel, as for example where sewage lagoons or<br />

highways are being protected. This kind of channelization change<br />

greatly accelerates flow and reduces flood storage.<br />

4. Those associated with a straightening and cleaning of seasonal or<br />

flood-period temporary drainage channels on the floodplain. This was<br />

observed today only in the Soap Lake area but these same<br />

constructed drainage channels also are seen in 1917 mapped on the<br />

now-abandoned floodplain south of Hollister. This class of changes<br />

reduces the time that overbank floodwater remains out of the channel,<br />

thus having a modest impact on downstream flood height.<br />

5. Those associated with dams and flood control structures and bank<br />

protection measures that harden banks, reduce bank and bed<br />

roughness, and reduce infiltration capacity and land surface runoff<br />

detention during intense rainfall events. Public works projects such as<br />

bridges, spillways, and highway berms tend to reduce bank and bed<br />

friction and thus accelerate runoff. <strong>The</strong> farther upstream or farther<br />

from the channel that these works are found, the less the degree of<br />

direct impact on peak flood heights. No matter how intense the rainfall<br />

or how long its duration. Uvas, Chesbro, and Hernandez reservoirs<br />

DRAFT 7/22/03<br />

38<br />

<strong>Pajaro</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Flood</strong> Management

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!