01.01.2015 Views

Pájaro River Watershed Flood Protection Plan - The Pajaro River ...

Pájaro River Watershed Flood Protection Plan - The Pajaro River ...

Pájaro River Watershed Flood Protection Plan - The Pajaro River ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Interestingly, the maximum consecutive 3-day flow volume was approximately<br />

the same for all four major floods on the <strong>Pájaro</strong> <strong>River</strong>. <strong>The</strong> amount of volume<br />

contributed by the San Benito <strong>River</strong> watershed, however, has grown from around a<br />

quarter in the 1950’s floods to around a half in the 1990’s floods. This means that the<br />

rest of the 1,186 square mile watershed at the Chittenden gage contributed less volume<br />

in the 1990’s floods than it did in the 1950’s floods.”<br />

Based on the RMC analysis, above, it would appear that something is changing in the<br />

<strong>Pájaro</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> system. To investigate further, we looked into storm tracks for the<br />

1995 and 1998 events based on precipitation and runoff at stations to the west and<br />

south of the center of the <strong>Pájaro</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong>. Appendix 2 includes a map of the<br />

stations used and plots of precipitation and runoff.<br />

Storm Patterns: Appendix 2 (Storm Analysis) compares the 1995 and 1998 <strong>Pájaro</strong><br />

<strong>Watershed</strong> events based on rainfall and runoff stations on both the west and south<br />

axes of the <strong>Pájaro</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> (see map in that Appendix). <strong>The</strong> two flood periods<br />

were associated with fundamentally different storm patterns. <strong>The</strong> 1995 event was<br />

shorter and much less intense at Corralitos and Hollister than in 1998, but the 1995<br />

storm near in the middle San Benito <strong>River</strong> watershed at Pinnacles National Monument<br />

was more intense than in 1998. More fundamentally, all stations indicate that the<br />

1995 peak discharge was nearly synchronous with the rainfall peak; while in 1998 the<br />

first rainfall peak did not result in a synchronous flood peak, and the 1998 rainfall had<br />

a longer duration and second period of intensity compared to 1995. What this seems<br />

to mean is that the 1995 storm stalled right over the centroid of the watershed near<br />

Hollister and produced an intense 48-hour flood, while the 1998 floods were the result<br />

of more widespread rainfall for a longer time resulting in flood peaks that were<br />

possibly near simultaneous, derived from both the upper <strong>Pájaro</strong> and San Benito<br />

subbasins. <strong>The</strong> 1945 and 1955 events were more like 1998 based on their<br />

widespread rainfall patterns. Standard probability analysis does not, unfortunately,<br />

differentiate among differing causal mechanisms for standard winter rainfall floods.<br />

<strong>The</strong> fact that the 1995 flooding in the Lower <strong>Pájaro</strong> Valley had a much steeper rising<br />

hydrograph limb may partly explain why piping (flow under the levees with erosion)<br />

appears to have contributed to the levee failures in 1995 but not in 1998 even though<br />

the flood stages below Murphy’s Crossing were similar. <strong>The</strong>se differences are<br />

reflected in the hydrographs at Chittenden:<br />

DRAFT 7/22/03<br />

30<br />

<strong>Pajaro</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Flood</strong> Management

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!