01.01.2015 Views

Pájaro River Watershed Flood Protection Plan - The Pajaro River ...

Pájaro River Watershed Flood Protection Plan - The Pajaro River ...

Pájaro River Watershed Flood Protection Plan - The Pajaro River ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Shown in Table 1 are annual instantaneous maximum peak discharges from<br />

two longterm stream gages – one on the San Benito <strong>River</strong> near the City of Hollister<br />

and one on the <strong>Pájaro</strong> <strong>River</strong> at Chittenden just upstream of the end of the Corps of<br />

Engineers <strong>Flood</strong> Control project.<br />

<strong>The</strong> San Benito <strong>River</strong> near Hollister gage had a drainage area of 586 square<br />

miles, while<br />

the current gage located at Highway 156 has a drainage area of 607 square<br />

miles. <strong>The</strong> drainage areas at the two gage locations are within 3.5 percent of one<br />

another and the combined record can be considered as one continuous record since<br />

1950. <strong>The</strong> drainage area at the San Benito stream gage is approximately half of that at<br />

the <strong>Pájaro</strong> <strong>River</strong> at Chittenden gage. Data has been collected on the <strong>Pájaro</strong> <strong>River</strong><br />

continuously since 1940. <strong>The</strong> four largest instantaneous peak events shown on the<br />

following table are in the 1956, 1958, 1995 and 1998 water years.<br />

<strong>The</strong> ratios for the peak discharges at the Chittenden gage divided by the peak<br />

discharges at the San Benito <strong>River</strong> gage for the four major flood years are:<br />

Water Year<br />

Ratio<br />

1956 3.217<br />

1958 2.026<br />

1995 1.287<br />

1998 0.728<br />

Because the ratio of the drainage areas at the gages is approximately 2.0, one<br />

might expect that the peak discharges maintain about that same ratio. However, the<br />

1956 event, the Christmas 1955 flood, shows much more of the peak discharge<br />

attributable to the Soap Lake portion of the Chittenden gage’s drainage area. <strong>The</strong> April<br />

1958 flood was fairly evenly distributed. <strong>The</strong> two most recent floods, the March 1995<br />

flood and the February 1998 flood, had much more of their peak discharge coming<br />

from the San Benito <strong>River</strong> portion of the overall watershed at the Chittenden gage site.<br />

<strong>The</strong> following table shows the average daily discharges on the two rivers for<br />

the four largest flood recorded at the Chittenden gage. <strong>The</strong> ratios of the sum of the<br />

average flows for the maximum three consecutive days are shown below:<br />

Date Chittenden San Benito Ratio<br />

12/1955 45,300 cfs-days 10,040 cfs-days 4.512<br />

4/1958 44,480 cfs-days 12,580 cfs-days 3.536<br />

3/1995 41,120 cfs-days 19,170 cfs-days 2.145<br />

2/1998 45,800 cfs-days 25,790 cfs-days 1.776<br />

DRAFT 7/22/03<br />

29<br />

<strong>Pajaro</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Flood</strong> Management

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!