Pájaro River Watershed Flood Protection Plan - The Pajaro River ...
Pájaro River Watershed Flood Protection Plan - The Pajaro River ...
Pájaro River Watershed Flood Protection Plan - The Pajaro River ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Upper <strong>Watershed</strong>, San Benito and Santa Clara Counties: <strong>The</strong> upper watershed of the<br />
<strong>Pájaro</strong> system is at least as complex as that of the portion west of the San Andreas Fault.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re is indirect geologic evidence that Santa Clara Valley from San Jose southward<br />
through Morgan Hill and Gilroy may have been the course of a major river carrying coarse<br />
gravels southward toward the present <strong>Pájaro</strong> <strong>River</strong> and that a lake in San Benito County<br />
later spilled northward along Coyote Valley into San Francisco Bay (Iwamura, 1995). An<br />
open and porous alluvial gravel characterizes the near surface substrate beneath both the<br />
north-flowing Coyote Creek and the south-flowing Llagas and Uvas Creek valleys. A very<br />
low gradient “watershed divide” near Morgan Hill has southward flow in a shallow<br />
subsurface aquifer, presumably recharged by Santa Clara Water District facilities from<br />
California Water Project sources (Anderson Reservoir) and from locally captured and<br />
diverted watercourses. Where this shallow gravel aquifer is exposed in the bank of the<br />
<strong>Pájaro</strong> <strong>River</strong>, along the westernmost Santa Clara -- San Benito County border, many<br />
cubic feet per second of water flow continuously into the <strong>Pájaro</strong> <strong>River</strong>. <strong>The</strong>se high water<br />
tables were recognized long before the San Luis Project brought Mt. Shasta water into<br />
southern Santa Clara and northern San Benito counties. <strong>The</strong> high groundwater levels are<br />
recognized as a particular agricultural problem in San Benito County (Jones & Stokes,<br />
1998) where some are saline.<br />
<strong>The</strong> thick uniform silt deposits of Northern San Benito and Southern Santa Clara<br />
counties are themselves enigmatic (see Fig 5 from Jenkins). Jenkins refers to them<br />
as “Pleistocene” meaning of Pleistocene age (greater than 10,000 years ago) and<br />
draws parallels with glacial age origin silts. Indeed, the surface deposits of lakebed<br />
silts are remarkably uniform fine sandy silt similar to glacial origin rock flour in both<br />
texture and lack of chemical weathering. But calling upon an ancestral San Joaquin<br />
<strong>River</strong> system to deposit these silts from the Sierra Nevada is, at present, not<br />
demonstrated. Jenkins hypothesizes that the silts may be derived locally from the<br />
older Purisima Formation (locally now called the Etchegoin Formation east of the San<br />
Andreas Fault). Subsurface deposits of northern San Benito County are characterized<br />
by localized sands and gravels that appear to be river deposits embedded in silts<br />
formed in shallow ephemeral lakes (Stanley, et al, 2002; Jones & Stokes, 1998).<br />
<strong>The</strong>se are then buried by the more uniform overlying silt lakebeds. It is these surface<br />
lake silt unit(s) that have been transported downstream to blanket the lower <strong>Pájaro</strong><br />
<strong>River</strong> Valley. It is not clear that they are being eroded from agricultural fields<br />
upstream, and may simply be carried in flood flows from upstream bank erosion.<br />
DRAFT 7/22/03<br />
13<br />
<strong>Pájaro</strong> <strong>Watershed</strong> <strong>Flood</strong> Management