09.11.2012 Views

Airports in Cities and Regions - KIT Scientific Publishing

Airports in Cities and Regions - KIT Scientific Publishing

Airports in Cities and Regions - KIT Scientific Publishing

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4 A speculation about potential spatial consequences of an<br />

emission-free air-traffic<br />

Prelude<br />

In the contrast<strong>in</strong>g perspective I assume a new, emission-free air-technology. I shall<br />

not try to speculate about its probability, but at least yesterday there was a short<br />

notice <strong>in</strong> the papers, that with<strong>in</strong> this year there will be an airplane with<br />

‘Brennstoffzellen’. Instead I shall use this perhaps futuristic assumption as a basis<br />

for a contrast<strong>in</strong>g scenario of a global city-network, consist<strong>in</strong>g of extended airports,<br />

connected by frequent airl<strong>in</strong>es<br />

An emission-free air-technology would lead most probably to a new enormous<br />

growth of air-traffic <strong>and</strong> more frequent air-connections. This could lead to a general<br />

‘shr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g’ of the globe, measured <strong>in</strong> travel-time, which <strong>in</strong> turn would unify the globe<br />

economically <strong>and</strong> culturally. The simple basic idea beh<strong>in</strong>d the conception of a new<br />

global-city-network would <strong>in</strong>duce the shift of the respective national borders to the<br />

outer edges of the extended airport <strong>and</strong> give the extended airport itself the status of<br />

nationally <strong>in</strong>dependent global unit, connected to other airports of the same status,<br />

adm<strong>in</strong>istered i.e. by the United Nations. The extended airport would be a k<strong>in</strong>d of<br />

‘township’ of a legally <strong>and</strong> politically unified global city. The global centrality of this<br />

global-city-network would reach the whole globe: It would be the natural site for<br />

global players, even for a global government. There might be ca. seven to ten ‘hubs’<br />

on the globe, reachable for the population by air-traffic <strong>in</strong> up to two hours. The<br />

virtual population of that ‘global-agglo’ would comprise several hundred million<br />

people!<br />

If this k<strong>in</strong>d of an economically <strong>and</strong> culturally unified, globally decentralised global<br />

city would be realised, than the different time-zones <strong>in</strong> the different ‘townships’ <strong>in</strong><br />

different cont<strong>in</strong>ents, lead<strong>in</strong>g to severe jet-lags, would be become a serious problem.<br />

Former students of m<strong>in</strong>e proposed <strong>in</strong> a design for a new airport a new type of<br />

build<strong>in</strong>g ‘conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g’ the local time of other parts of the globe, so that one could<br />

gradually adapt to one’s own bio rhythm. This is just an example of how such a new<br />

k<strong>in</strong>d of global city might lead to new problems but also to new solutions. At any rate,<br />

an emission-free air-traffic would start a new Kondratieff-circle, <strong>and</strong> nobody can<br />

know what this will mean for the future.<br />

5 F<strong>in</strong>al remarks<br />

If we accept the uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty of the present situation concern<strong>in</strong>g the future of airtransportation,<br />

we should try to keep open both options – shr<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> growth of<br />

air-traffic. As I have tried to l<strong>in</strong>e out, both options promise a profitable <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>terest<strong>in</strong>g future for the city.<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!