Chapter 7 Conclusion - Gilles Daniel

Chapter 7 Conclusion - Gilles Daniel Chapter 7 Conclusion - Gilles Daniel

gillesdaniel.com
from gillesdaniel.com More from this publisher
01.01.2015 Views

Chapter 7 Conclusion “The effect of noise on the world, and our views of the world, are profound. [...] Most generally, noise makes it very difficult to test either practical or academic theories about the way that financial or economic markets work. We are forced to act largely in the dark.” Fisher Black, Noise [Bla86] This chapter brings the thesis to a conclusion. We begin by summarising the key points of this work, what guided us in this direction and what can be learned from our models and experiments. We then review our contributions and academic achievements, and suggest some direct applications for practitioners. 7.1 On the origins of this thesis This thesis has been mainly concerned with the role played by liquidity in the dynamics of price formation in stock markets. We started by acknowledging that since its very creation, the field of academic Finance has largely dismissed as irrelevant the way markets are organised and operate, favouring instead the parsimonious and analytically tractable efficient market models. From this normative perspective, markets operate at equilibrium between the aggregate supply and demand generated by informed and rational traders, so that the prices they produce constantly reflect any type of information and constitute the best possible estimator of the fundamental value of shares. One of the reasons explaining the early success of this approach, aside from providing closed form solutions and feeding free market advocates with useful theoretical arguments, is that this 170

<strong>Chapter</strong> 7<br />

<strong>Conclusion</strong><br />

“The effect of noise on the world, and our views of the world, are<br />

profound. [...] Most generally, noise makes it very difficult to test<br />

either practical or academic theories about the way that financial or<br />

economic markets work. We are forced to act largely in the dark.”<br />

Fisher Black, Noise [Bla86]<br />

This chapter brings the thesis to a conclusion. We begin by summarising<br />

the key points of this work, what guided us in this direction and what can be<br />

learned from our models and experiments. We then review our contributions and<br />

academic achievements, and suggest some direct applications for practitioners.<br />

7.1 On the origins of this thesis<br />

This thesis has been mainly concerned with the role played by liquidity in the<br />

dynamics of price formation in stock markets. We started by acknowledging<br />

that since its very creation, the field of academic Finance has largely dismissed<br />

as irrelevant the way markets are organised and operate, favouring instead the<br />

parsimonious and analytically tractable efficient market models. From this normative<br />

perspective, markets operate at equilibrium between the aggregate supply<br />

and demand generated by informed and rational traders, so that the prices they<br />

produce constantly reflect any type of information and constitute the best possible<br />

estimator of the fundamental value of shares. One of the reasons explaining<br />

the early success of this approach, aside from providing closed form solutions<br />

and feeding free market advocates with useful theoretical arguments, is that this<br />

170


CHAPTER 7. CONCLUSION 171<br />

so-called fundamental value is so difficult to estimate in real life that one can<br />

never falsify the hypothesis that market prices actually reflect it closely. In fact,<br />

only indirect evidence on its predictions could be provided, for instance on the<br />

apparent random nature of price changes or the inability of fund managers to<br />

consistently outperform the market. However, it was shown that market prices<br />

are far too volatile to be simply explained by the arrival of new information, and<br />

some research started being conducted on the role of market microstructure and<br />

the incidence of traders’ psychology on their decision making process. Market<br />

Microstructure and Behavioral Finance are nowadays two research fields widely<br />

recognised for their contribution to a deeper understanding of financial markets.<br />

With the wider availability of data, more stylised facts exhibited by real markets<br />

were identified, and the research endeavour to explain these properties left unexplained<br />

by the efficient market models shifted from exogenous information-based<br />

models to the study of endogenous dynamics that could generate comparable price<br />

changes. In particular, some statistical models have recently been presented in<br />

the field of EconoPhysics that relate the dynamics of the order flow to the price<br />

dynamics.<br />

In order to capitalise on these recent advances in the fields of Market Microstructure,<br />

Behavioral Finance and EconoPhysics, we participated in a project<br />

having an artificial stock market implementing a double auction mechanism, the<br />

most pervasive matching mechanism found among real markets. Special attention<br />

was paid to the design of the market architecture, and the model was agent-based<br />

so as to allow for the easy modelling of various trading strategies. The aims were<br />

multiple. Firstly, to verify whether classical models of price formation, that<br />

assume that markets operate at equilibrium following a simple price clearing condition,<br />

would survive or alternatively break down when tested in a more realistic<br />

market environment. Secondly, to relate the dynamics of the order flow to the<br />

microscopic behaviour of the traders responsible for it, with the hope of eventually<br />

being able to provide first principle explanations of the dynamics of the<br />

order flow and of global price formation. Finally, to test the impact of different<br />

trading strategies on these price dynamics. In the process of experimenting with<br />

this market simulator, we realised the importance of timing for trading strategies:<br />

two strategies identical on every point except on their timing will not have the<br />

same price impact (and hence probably not the same performance), even if they<br />

produce the same net aggregate demand. This is because the price dynamics are


CHAPTER 7. CONCLUSION 172<br />

affected not only by the aggregate level of supply and demand, but more importantly<br />

by the timing in which orders arrive, are stored in the book or generate<br />

a trade which moves the price; in a word, by the liquidity of the market. This<br />

became the main thesis of this work.<br />

7.2 Contributions and achievements<br />

In this dissertation, we have presented a model and computer implementation of<br />

zero-intelligence agents which is able to generate a realistic order flow – except<br />

for the long memory in orders signs, incompatible with random agents – which in<br />

turn produces realistic price dynamics, and is able to recover qualitatively and to<br />

a certain extent quantitatively the main stylised facts exhibited by real markets.<br />

We found that these non-trivial statistical properties are the result of the subtle<br />

interplay between limit orders, which provide liquidity, and market and cancellation<br />

orders, which remove it. To our knowledge, such a micro-founded agent-based<br />

model presenting first principle explanations to the emergence of global price dynamics<br />

is presently unique. Its significance is the following: first, it highlights<br />

the need for considering carefully the impact of the market microstructure on<br />

the price dynamics, and to recognise the usefulness and validity of disequilibrium<br />

models of price dynamics. Second, since this zero-intelligence model recovers the<br />

main stylised facts with no assumption on agents’ behaviour or trading strategy,<br />

it can compete with models assuming a simplified price clearing condition and<br />

requiring specific assumptions on the part of the agents themselves to produce<br />

realistic price dynamics. Each type of model can certainly contribute in different<br />

ways to a deeper understanding of the true underlying process. Finally, like many<br />

others before, this model is able to reproduce price dynamics, and therefore suggest<br />

possible explanations, with no need for the arrival of external information.<br />

Once again, we are not claiming that new information is irrelevant in explaining<br />

price changes, but rather that most price changes are effectively the result of<br />

uninformed demand shift, and further that their properties can be explained in<br />

terms of liquidity dynamics at the micro level.<br />

A limited contribution, probably relevant mainly to the field of Agent-based


CHAPTER 7. CONCLUSION 173<br />

Computational Economics, was to highlight the importance of the statistical equilibrium<br />

price present in closed markets, which can act as a price attractor disturbing<br />

the dynamics under study. A characterisation of the actual speed of convergence<br />

of the price to this attractor was offered, in terms of agents’ risk aversion<br />

profile, and indicators signalling such a convergence were presented, namely the<br />

skewness and Gini coefficient of agents’ endowments.<br />

We then shifted our attention back to the original question informational<br />

efficiency of markets, and whether the market prices we observe reflect any fundamental<br />

value. As we have seen before, this cannot be tested directly with<br />

market data, due to the impossibility of assessing the fundamental value. However,<br />

in an artificial market, one can at least test the internal consistency of<br />

theoretical models. We proposed an innovative model of a self-referential market,<br />

based on the theoretical framework of the Self-Referential Market Hypothesis,<br />

which we see as an extension of the Efficient Market Hypothesis in markets for<br />

which there is no common knowledge fundamental value – a description much<br />

closer to real markets, in our opinion – and tested this model in two different<br />

market conditions. Firstly, we started by assuming the existence of a common<br />

knowledge fundamental value, defined externally to the market, so as to test the<br />

predictions of the Efficient Market Hypothesis in the setting of our double auction<br />

mechanism. In these conditions, our self-referential agents acted as fully<br />

informed rational arbitrageurs and, as expected by the EMH, the market price<br />

closely tracked the fundamental value. However, when the rational arbitrageurs<br />

had the slightest uncertainty regarding the true level of the fundamental value,<br />

the uninformed traders, implemented by zero-intelligence agents, were not driven<br />

out of the market, as would have been expected.<br />

Finally, we relaxed the assumption of a common knowledge fundamental value,<br />

and observed that even in the absence of external information, self-referential<br />

agents could coordinate their expectations around a given price level, which could<br />

be stable for some time and appear as reflecting a consensus price on the fundamental<br />

value of the stock. However, a simple volatility feedback was enough<br />

to lead eventually to the endogenous destabilisation of this convention, followed<br />

by a period of self-referential crisis and finally the emergence of a new convention,<br />

thanks to the observation in the order book of salient points, price levels<br />

at which the latent liquidity had accumulated. This mechanism could explain


CHAPTER 7. CONCLUSION 174<br />

the apparent stability of market prices, which we interpret a posteriori as reflecting<br />

certain economic realities, quickly followed by their destabilisation for no<br />

apparent reason.<br />

7.3 Applications and possible extensions<br />

In the opening of this dissertation, we have identified two properties that well<br />

functioning financial markets should possess: informational efficiency and liquidity.<br />

Informational efficiency, the degree to which prices produced by markets<br />

reflect the underlying economic reality of the assets traded, is required if we want<br />

markets to provide reliable signals to investors, and therefore avoid the waste of<br />

resources. Liquidity, on the other hand, is a property required by investors in<br />

order to invest their capital in the first place: they want stable prices, indicative<br />

of the effective price at which they could get in or out of the market. These<br />

two properties appear as completely unrelated in mainstream equilibrium models,<br />

since the first is accepted as a basic axiom and the second is relegated to the<br />

rank of technical detail. However, we hope to have succeeded in this thesis in<br />

showing that informational efficiency and liquidity might be intrinsically linked,<br />

and, more generally, to help attract the attention of the academic community on<br />

the need for developing disequilibrium models of price formation.<br />

What are the policy implications for market designers and market participants<br />

André Orléan claims that financial markets have lost their social role of<br />

providing strong and reliable signals to the economy, to the profit of speculators<br />

striving on the provision of liquidity. One thing is for sure, stock exchanges are<br />

nowadays converging toward fully automated markets using the double auction<br />

mechanism and competing for volumes and liquidity. Concommitently, real-time<br />

access to tick-by-tick data allows for the elaboration of sophisticated trading<br />

strategies executed by computer algorithms. Simulations can help apprehend<br />

this changing reality: we are now working with an Electronic Communication<br />

Network on the NASDAQ focusing on large volumes, and with a hedge fund<br />

specialised in automated trading, in order to extend the functionalities of our<br />

market simulator and use it as a sandbox for the testing of new market designs<br />

and innovative trading strategies.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!