View PDF document - Masonry First
View PDF document - Masonry First
View PDF document - Masonry First
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
• For Developers the framework acknowledges that the housebuilding process must<br />
not be tied to the delivery time of an Allowable Solutions project, which may be long<br />
term. The verification process allows the early release of an Allowable Solutions<br />
Certificate, so that Building Control approval (to Part L 2016) should never be delayed<br />
by the use of Allowable Solutions.<br />
• For Local Planning Authorities the framework provides the opportunity to steer the<br />
selection of local Allowable Solutions projects towards those that maximise benefits to<br />
local communities and constituents. Additionally there is the option of developing a<br />
Community Energy Fund which may provide a magnet for local investment in carbon<br />
saving projects. This will further increase the opportunities for developing more<br />
significant local carbon-saving projects and the possibility of linking with other Local<br />
Planning Authorities to further increase the scale of future projects. To take this<br />
opportunity, however, Local Planning Authorities will need to develop policies related<br />
to Allowable Solutions delivery and this is recognised as a major commitment.<br />
• For Suppliers of Allowable Solutions projects, the framework proposal provides the<br />
basis for a transparent business environment in which there is fair competition and<br />
clear rules of engagement.<br />
• For Building Control, the framework will provide simplicity. A verifiable certificate<br />
showing carbon abated will be issued as evidence that the Allowable Solutions part of<br />
the zero carbon requirements in Part L 2016 has been met. It is recognised that there<br />
are some training implications for Building Control Staff in understanding the context of<br />
Allowable Solutions within the overall ‘Carbon’ performance of a development.<br />
• Further consultation is proposed in three key areas:<br />
1 To test the appetite within the finance communities for the concepts of<br />
‘Community Energy Funds’ and ‘Private Energy Funds’. In particular to check the<br />
strength of their inclination to provide debt finance to either and the risks they<br />
would perceive;<br />
2 To establish the terms of reference and an operational model for the proposed<br />
Verification and Certification Scheme – developing a scheme that is low in<br />
complexity and high in assurance is vital;<br />
3 To consider the development of the Fund Holding body and how this is<br />
integrated with the financial sector, and particularly the Green Investment Bank.<br />
• How the framework is developed is critical. The right framework for Allowable<br />
Solutions could stimulate innovation and create huge opportunities for leveraging<br />
secondary funding from businesses, debt financiers and private investors that are<br />
looking to invest in carbon-reduction projects. These and other medium and long<br />
term benefits could play a major role in helping to balance the economy and building a<br />
high level of skills and knowledge in low carbon technologies.<br />
7