31.12.2014 Views

From Label to Liable: Scams, Scandals and Secrecy - Voiceless

From Label to Liable: Scams, Scandals and Secrecy - Voiceless

From Label to Liable: Scams, Scandals and Secrecy - Voiceless

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2. ANIMAL PROTECTION AND THE NEW<br />

CONSUMER REVOLUTION<br />

I. A growing movement<br />

a) Each year more than 540 million farm animals<br />

are raised in Australia for food or food production<br />

purposes. Most of these animals never live <strong>to</strong> see<br />

the sun or feel the earth under their feet. The<br />

overwhelming majority spend their lives confined<br />

indoors, where they are denied their natural<br />

behaviours <strong>and</strong> interactions <strong>and</strong> are subject <strong>to</strong><br />

mutilations without pain relief.<br />

b) Until recently, the suffering of farm animals has<br />

largely occurred behind closed doors; however in<br />

recent times public awareness about the suffering of<br />

animals has increased. This has led <strong>to</strong> marked changes<br />

in the community’s attitudes <strong>to</strong>wards animals.<br />

c) The animal protection movement has been<br />

growing in size <strong>and</strong> legitimacy, both in Australia <strong>and</strong><br />

around the world. It is now comparable in force <strong>to</strong><br />

the environmental movement 20 years ago. Back<br />

then, environmentalists were considered ‘radical<br />

greenies’. Today, almost 3 million Australians donate<br />

time or money <strong>to</strong> help protect the environment<br />

<strong>and</strong> 89% of Australians purchase environmentally<br />

friendly products. 6<br />

d) The animal protection movement is following<br />

suit <strong>and</strong> animal protection is becoming a concern<br />

of many mainstream Australians. For example,<br />

Australia’s peak animal protection body, Animals<br />

Australia, has experienced more than 400% growth<br />

in its support base in the past three years. 7 Other<br />

indica<strong>to</strong>rs that public perceptions of animals are<br />

changing include:<br />

i) A survey carried out by Roy Morgan Research<br />

revealed that the percentage of Australians who<br />

consider animal welfare <strong>and</strong> cruelty <strong>to</strong> animals <strong>to</strong><br />

be an important social issue increased from 29%<br />

<strong>to</strong> 54% between 1994 <strong>and</strong> 2000. 8<br />

ii) In the 2005-06 budget, the Federal<br />

Government allocated $6 million <strong>to</strong> the<br />

implementation of an Australian Animal Welfare<br />

Strategy, 9 designed <strong>to</strong> achieve an enhanced<br />

national approach <strong>to</strong> animal welfare. 10<br />

iii) In the 2006-07 budget, the Federal<br />

Government introduced legislation intended <strong>to</strong><br />

create a new deductible gift recipient category<br />

for animal welfare. 11<br />

iv) In a 2006 national survey, participants<br />

identified fac<strong>to</strong>ry farming practices <strong>and</strong><br />

treatment of lives<strong>to</strong>ck as amongst the most<br />

prominent issues in Australian animal welfare. 12<br />

e) This change in public sentiment <strong>to</strong>wards the<br />

suffering of animals is not confined <strong>to</strong> Australia. In<br />

fact, support for the animal protection movement<br />

is gathering momentum well beyond our shores.<br />

For example:<br />

i) North America’s largest <strong>and</strong> most powerful<br />

animal protection organisation, The Humane<br />

Society of the United States (HSUS), has nearly<br />

10 million members. 13 It seeks <strong>to</strong> create<br />

meaningful social change for animals <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> fight<br />

cruelty <strong>and</strong> animal abuse in all its forms through<br />

education, litigation <strong>and</strong> lobbying. 14<br />

6 Australian Bureau of Statistics, Environmental Issues: People’s Views <strong>and</strong> Practices, 24 November 2004 .<br />

7 Glenys Oogjes, Executive Direc<strong>to</strong>r, Animals Australia, pers comm, 15 December 2006.<br />

8 Meat <strong>and</strong> Lives<strong>to</strong>ck Australia, Animal Welfare Issues Survey 2000, March 2002, 6.<br />

9 Department of Agriculture, Fisheries <strong>and</strong> Forestry, Commonwealth Government, National Implementation Plan of the Australian Animal Welfare Strategy,<br />

(2006) .<br />

10 Department of Agriculture, Fisheries <strong>and</strong> Forestry, Commonwealth Government, Australian Animal Welfare Strategy, (2005)<br />

.<br />

11 Although this legislation was not intended <strong>to</strong> enable all animal protection organisations <strong>to</strong> attract funds from individuals <strong>and</strong> family foundations<br />

(registered as prescribed private funds), its introduction indicates that the government is increasingly willing <strong>to</strong> recognise the community’s interest in<br />

animal welfare. See Tax Laws Amendment (Measures No. 3) Bill 2006, Item 4.1.6.<br />

12 TNS Social Research Consultants, Attitudes Toward Animal Welfare, July 2006, 3.2.<br />

13 The Humane Society of the United States, About Us .<br />

14 Ibid.<br />

<strong>From</strong> <strong>Label</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Liable</strong> Lifting the veil on animal-derived food product labelling in Australia 7

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!