From Label to Liable: Scams, Scandals and Secrecy - Voiceless
From Label to Liable: Scams, Scandals and Secrecy - Voiceless
From Label to Liable: Scams, Scandals and Secrecy - Voiceless
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
INTRODUCING TRUTH IN LABELLING – KEY POINTS<br />
• In order <strong>to</strong> make informed decisions, consumers need information about the production systems<br />
from which animal-derived food products are sourced.<br />
• If a product label is ‘silent’ as <strong>to</strong> its farm production method, there is a strong likelihood that it<br />
has been sourced from a fac<strong>to</strong>ry farmed animal.<br />
• There are a number of terms currently used <strong>to</strong> differentiate the source of animal products. These<br />
include caged/battery eggs, barn laid eggs, free range, open range or range eggs, grain fed beef,<br />
free-range, bred free-range, organic <strong>and</strong> biodynamic.<br />
• Most of these commonly accepted terms are not defined in legislation, which means there is<br />
broad scope for consumer uncertainty as <strong>to</strong> their true meaning.<br />
• Different production systems impose varying degrees of suffering on animals, ranging from fac<strong>to</strong>ry<br />
farming systems such as caged/battery eggs <strong>and</strong> grain fed beef which cause substantial physical <strong>and</strong><br />
psychological suffering, <strong>to</strong> organic systems which cause less suffering.<br />
V. Trends <strong>to</strong>wards the truth<br />
a) As discussed in Chapter 2 (above), in recent<br />
times consumers have become more concerned<br />
about the food they purchase, with trends <strong>to</strong>wards<br />
ethical living on the rise. As a corollary of this,<br />
consumers have begun asking more questions about<br />
the origins of the food they are buying <strong>and</strong> the<br />
associated production processes. 140<br />
b) A range of Australian organisations <strong>and</strong> leading<br />
meat industry bodies, including Australian Pork<br />
Limited, have acknowledged the right of consumers<br />
<strong>to</strong> have sufficient information <strong>to</strong> make proper<br />
purchasing decisions. 141 However at the time of<br />
writing, there is no legislation in Australia which<br />
requires the labelling of production systems for<br />
animal-derived food products such as meat, poultry<br />
<strong>and</strong> dairy products. 142<br />
c) Consumers use product labels <strong>to</strong> determine<br />
product choice while shopping <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> learn more<br />
about food, including how a product has been<br />
produced. 143 For the average consumer, humanely<br />
produced products cannot be easily distinguished<br />
from fac<strong>to</strong>ry farmed products without an effective<br />
label. In fact, some product attributes may ‘remain<br />
unknown <strong>to</strong> consumers upon inspection <strong>and</strong> even<br />
after consumption’. 144 This highlights the need for<br />
honest <strong>and</strong> clear production system information <strong>to</strong><br />
be provided before the point of sale.<br />
d) In response <strong>to</strong> growing calls for ‘truth in labelling’,<br />
certain kinds of m<strong>and</strong>a<strong>to</strong>ry food product labelling<br />
have come in<strong>to</strong> effect in recent years. For example:<br />
i) In 2001, the labelling of genetically modified<br />
organisms (GMOs) became m<strong>and</strong>a<strong>to</strong>ry; 145 <strong>and</strong><br />
ii) In 2005, Country of Origin st<strong>and</strong>ards for<br />
labelling were introduced, <strong>to</strong> enable consumers <strong>to</strong><br />
identify Australian-made products. 146<br />
e) GMO <strong>and</strong> Country of Origin labelling have<br />
received strong support from the community<br />
140 Agriculture <strong>and</strong> Food Policy Reference Group, Ensuring a Profitable <strong>and</strong> Sustainable Agriculture <strong>and</strong> Food Sec<strong>to</strong>r in Australia, 5<br />
.<br />
141 Other organisations that have supported labelling of animal products include Animals Australia. See: Australian Pork Limited, Submission 4 <strong>to</strong><br />
Productivity Commission, 2.6.7 ; Animals Australia, Submission <strong>to</strong> The Agriculture <strong>and</strong> Food Policy Reference Group, 2005, 7<br />
.<br />
142 Limited legislative mechanisms are in place in some jurisdictions for the labelling of eggs. See: Egg (<strong>Label</strong>ling <strong>and</strong> Sale) Act 2001 (ACT) s 5; Egg Industry<br />
Act 2002 (Tas) ss 8, 19.Food Policy Reference Group, 2005, 7 .<br />
143 Donna Paterson, Rhonda Zapelli <strong>and</strong> Anna Chalmers (NFO Donovan Research), Australian New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Food Authority, Qualitative Research with<br />
Consumers - Food <strong>Label</strong>ling Issues, 2001, 11 .<br />
144 Hui-Shung (Christie) Chang, Agribusiness Perspectives Papers 2005 – <strong>Label</strong>ling Issues of Organic <strong>and</strong> GM Foods in Australia (Paper 67, 2005), 7<br />
.<br />
145 Australia New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Food St<strong>and</strong>ards Code, St<strong>and</strong>ard 1.5.2, (commenced December 2001).<br />
146 Australia New Zeal<strong>and</strong> Food St<strong>and</strong>ards Code, St<strong>and</strong>ard 1.2.11; Trade Practices Amendment (Country of Origin Representations) Act 1998 (Cth). Country of Origin<br />
st<strong>and</strong>ards have been incorporated in state <strong>and</strong> terri<strong>to</strong>ry legislation through the adoption of the Food St<strong>and</strong>ards Code. See below n158. See also Commerce<br />
(Trade Descriptions) Act 1905 (Cth) s 7; Commerce (Imports) Regulations 1940 (Cth) reg 8 for Country of Origin st<strong>and</strong>ards for imports.<br />
<strong>From</strong> <strong>Label</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Liable</strong> Lifting the veil on animal-derived food product labelling in Australia 17