From Label to Liable: Scams, Scandals and Secrecy - Voiceless
From Label to Liable: Scams, Scandals and Secrecy - Voiceless
From Label to Liable: Scams, Scandals and Secrecy - Voiceless
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
III. Lifting the veil of secrecy<br />
a) One of the traditional obstacles <strong>to</strong> the<br />
expansion of markets for humanely produced<br />
animal food products is the presence of a ‘veil of<br />
secrecy’ which shields consumers from the truth<br />
about how animals are raised for food in<br />
fac<strong>to</strong>ry farms. This veil has largely disempowered<br />
consumers from taking personal action <strong>to</strong> prevent<br />
animals from suffering.<br />
b) Fac<strong>to</strong>ry farms are removed from the public eye,<br />
unmarked <strong>and</strong> nondescript. Most of us drive by<br />
them completely unaware of the tens of thous<strong>and</strong>s<br />
of animals contained inside. The public are denied<br />
access <strong>to</strong> these farms <strong>and</strong> even the media face<br />
significant difficulties reporting the ‘inside s<strong>to</strong>ry’.<br />
Consequently ‘uncensored’ images of the lives of<br />
these animals are extremely difficult <strong>to</strong> obtain. 101<br />
c) Cleverly, farming industries rarely represent<br />
fac<strong>to</strong>ry farmed animals in their marketing <strong>and</strong><br />
labelling of products such as meat, dairy <strong>and</strong> eggs.<br />
They know that if they were <strong>to</strong> show the reality of<br />
life for animals on their farms, their products would<br />
not sell as well. Rather, they encourage consumers<br />
<strong>to</strong> disassociate food from animals by using pretty<br />
imagery such as flowers <strong>and</strong> butterflies 102 as part of<br />
their public relations spin. In circumstances where<br />
animals are linked <strong>to</strong> food products, labels often<br />
present a ‘romantic view’ of rural life. Consumers<br />
see images of rustic scenes, farmhouses, happy<br />
families, cows <strong>and</strong> chickens frolicking in green fields<br />
with cheerful, animated farmers. They don’t see the<br />
fac<strong>to</strong>ry farm reality of animals in permanent indoor<br />
confinement, denied all freedom <strong>to</strong> carry out their<br />
natural behaviour.<br />
d) Misunderst<strong>and</strong>ing about the true origin of animalderived<br />
food products is often enhanced by the use<br />
of imprecise or suggestive wording such as ‘farm<br />
fresh’ or ‘naturally perfect’. These terms increase the<br />
likelihood of consumers being misled as <strong>to</strong> the life of<br />
the animal behind the product.<br />
LIFTING THE VEIL OF SECRECY<br />
– KEY POINTS<br />
• A veil of secrecy shields consumers from<br />
the truth about how animals are raised<br />
for food in fac<strong>to</strong>ry farms.<br />
• Marketers use positive imagery on animalderived<br />
food products encouraging<br />
consumers <strong>to</strong> disassociate products from<br />
the horrendous reality of fac<strong>to</strong>ry-farming.<br />
• Ambiguously worded food labels such as<br />
‘farm fresh’ or ‘naturally perfect’ reinforce<br />
the likelihood of consumers being misled<br />
as <strong>to</strong> the true origin of the product.<br />
IV. Introducing truth in labelling<br />
a) Truth in labelling of animal-derived food<br />
products enables <strong>and</strong> encourages consumers <strong>to</strong><br />
make informed choices about the products they<br />
are buying. This is achieved by disclosing the true<br />
nature of the animal production systems that<br />
consumers are supporting when they purchase<br />
particular products.<br />
b) The following are examples of terms currently<br />
used <strong>to</strong> describe different kinds of animal production<br />
systems in Australia that influence consumer choice. If<br />
a product label is silent as <strong>to</strong> its farm production<br />
method, given that the overwhelming majority of<br />
animals are now raised intensively, there is a strong<br />
likelihood that the product has been sourced from a<br />
fac<strong>to</strong>ry farmed animal.<br />
c) Marketing <strong>and</strong> labelling claims<br />
i) Caged/Battery eggs<br />
1. Battery or caged-egg production is a form of<br />
fac<strong>to</strong>ry farming (intensive production). Birds in<br />
‘cage systems’ are housed in cages within a shed<br />
for their entire lives. 103 Typically, a hen will share<br />
her cage with 3 or 4 others 104 <strong>and</strong> has a space<br />
approximately the size of an A4 sheet of paper<br />
101 Peter Singer <strong>and</strong> Jim Mason, above n 22, 5-9.<br />
102 See Australian Pork Limited March 2004 <strong>and</strong> Summer 2004/05 advertising campaigns .<br />
103 Primary Industries St<strong>and</strong>ing Committee, Model Code of Practice for the Welfare of Animals – Domestic Poultry, 4th ed., (2002) [2.1.1.1].<br />
104 Animals Australia, Battery Hens, March 2004 .<br />
<strong>From</strong> <strong>Label</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Liable</strong> Lifting the veil on animal-derived food product labelling in Australia 13