31.12.2014 Views

From Label to Liable: Scams, Scandals and Secrecy - Voiceless

From Label to Liable: Scams, Scandals and Secrecy - Voiceless

From Label to Liable: Scams, Scandals and Secrecy - Voiceless

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

III. Lifting the veil of secrecy<br />

a) One of the traditional obstacles <strong>to</strong> the<br />

expansion of markets for humanely produced<br />

animal food products is the presence of a ‘veil of<br />

secrecy’ which shields consumers from the truth<br />

about how animals are raised for food in<br />

fac<strong>to</strong>ry farms. This veil has largely disempowered<br />

consumers from taking personal action <strong>to</strong> prevent<br />

animals from suffering.<br />

b) Fac<strong>to</strong>ry farms are removed from the public eye,<br />

unmarked <strong>and</strong> nondescript. Most of us drive by<br />

them completely unaware of the tens of thous<strong>and</strong>s<br />

of animals contained inside. The public are denied<br />

access <strong>to</strong> these farms <strong>and</strong> even the media face<br />

significant difficulties reporting the ‘inside s<strong>to</strong>ry’.<br />

Consequently ‘uncensored’ images of the lives of<br />

these animals are extremely difficult <strong>to</strong> obtain. 101<br />

c) Cleverly, farming industries rarely represent<br />

fac<strong>to</strong>ry farmed animals in their marketing <strong>and</strong><br />

labelling of products such as meat, dairy <strong>and</strong> eggs.<br />

They know that if they were <strong>to</strong> show the reality of<br />

life for animals on their farms, their products would<br />

not sell as well. Rather, they encourage consumers<br />

<strong>to</strong> disassociate food from animals by using pretty<br />

imagery such as flowers <strong>and</strong> butterflies 102 as part of<br />

their public relations spin. In circumstances where<br />

animals are linked <strong>to</strong> food products, labels often<br />

present a ‘romantic view’ of rural life. Consumers<br />

see images of rustic scenes, farmhouses, happy<br />

families, cows <strong>and</strong> chickens frolicking in green fields<br />

with cheerful, animated farmers. They don’t see the<br />

fac<strong>to</strong>ry farm reality of animals in permanent indoor<br />

confinement, denied all freedom <strong>to</strong> carry out their<br />

natural behaviour.<br />

d) Misunderst<strong>and</strong>ing about the true origin of animalderived<br />

food products is often enhanced by the use<br />

of imprecise or suggestive wording such as ‘farm<br />

fresh’ or ‘naturally perfect’. These terms increase the<br />

likelihood of consumers being misled as <strong>to</strong> the life of<br />

the animal behind the product.<br />

LIFTING THE VEIL OF SECRECY<br />

– KEY POINTS<br />

• A veil of secrecy shields consumers from<br />

the truth about how animals are raised<br />

for food in fac<strong>to</strong>ry farms.<br />

• Marketers use positive imagery on animalderived<br />

food products encouraging<br />

consumers <strong>to</strong> disassociate products from<br />

the horrendous reality of fac<strong>to</strong>ry-farming.<br />

• Ambiguously worded food labels such as<br />

‘farm fresh’ or ‘naturally perfect’ reinforce<br />

the likelihood of consumers being misled<br />

as <strong>to</strong> the true origin of the product.<br />

IV. Introducing truth in labelling<br />

a) Truth in labelling of animal-derived food<br />

products enables <strong>and</strong> encourages consumers <strong>to</strong><br />

make informed choices about the products they<br />

are buying. This is achieved by disclosing the true<br />

nature of the animal production systems that<br />

consumers are supporting when they purchase<br />

particular products.<br />

b) The following are examples of terms currently<br />

used <strong>to</strong> describe different kinds of animal production<br />

systems in Australia that influence consumer choice. If<br />

a product label is silent as <strong>to</strong> its farm production<br />

method, given that the overwhelming majority of<br />

animals are now raised intensively, there is a strong<br />

likelihood that the product has been sourced from a<br />

fac<strong>to</strong>ry farmed animal.<br />

c) Marketing <strong>and</strong> labelling claims<br />

i) Caged/Battery eggs<br />

1. Battery or caged-egg production is a form of<br />

fac<strong>to</strong>ry farming (intensive production). Birds in<br />

‘cage systems’ are housed in cages within a shed<br />

for their entire lives. 103 Typically, a hen will share<br />

her cage with 3 or 4 others 104 <strong>and</strong> has a space<br />

approximately the size of an A4 sheet of paper<br />

101 Peter Singer <strong>and</strong> Jim Mason, above n 22, 5-9.<br />

102 See Australian Pork Limited March 2004 <strong>and</strong> Summer 2004/05 advertising campaigns .<br />

103 Primary Industries St<strong>and</strong>ing Committee, Model Code of Practice for the Welfare of Animals – Domestic Poultry, 4th ed., (2002) [2.1.1.1].<br />

104 Animals Australia, Battery Hens, March 2004 .<br />

<strong>From</strong> <strong>Label</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Liable</strong> Lifting the veil on animal-derived food product labelling in Australia 13

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!