Handbook of Corporate Communication and Public ... - Blogs Unpad

Handbook of Corporate Communication and Public ... - Blogs Unpad Handbook of Corporate Communication and Public ... - Blogs Unpad

blogs.unpad.ac.id
from blogs.unpad.ac.id More from this publisher
31.12.2014 Views

and physical ability. As the concept of diversity evolves to fit the contemporary workplace where organizations have flattened structures and moved to new team and workgroup forms designed to increase synchronous communication, more complex categories of diversity are the focus of research. For example Jehn, Northcraft and Neale (1999) did a field study of ninety-two workgroups applying three types of workplace diversity (social category diversity, value diversity and informational diversity). They found it appropriate to question the typical hypothesis, taught as a basic concept on group dynamics, that heterogeneity in groups leads to better group performance, while homogeneity leads to better group process. However, the reality is more complex. Their field study discovered that social category diversity could be mediated by task type and task interdependence and that value diversity could be the most frequent impediment to group performance. Consequently, being alert to the impact of diverse value sets, reflected by worldview and mindset, is a key challenge to those who wish to mobilize all of the human assets in a given decision-making setting. Contemporary theorists have described strategic stages of the development of diversity programmes. Allen and Montgomery (2001) define the stages simply as: ‘unfreezing’ the forces resisting change; ‘moving’ to cultural change; ‘refreezing’, or institutionalizing the change; and the ‘competitive advantage’ that results. In 1996 Thomas and Ely defined three paradigms to explain the evolution of a diversity programme. Initially, the ‘discrimination and fairness paradigm’ must be satisfied. Second, the ‘access and legitimacy paradigm’ must be put in place, and reinforced. Third, the programme must strive for ‘the emerging paradigm’ that connects diversity to work perspectives. Subsequently the third perspective has been further defined as the ‘integration-and-learning’ perspective that enables dialogue on diversity issues to occur (Ely and Thomas, 2001). From the manager’s vantage point, is the goal of the diversity programme to enforce law and expectations and support incremental improvements Or is the goal to develop and maintain a systemic programme that has a dramatic impact on the corporate culture It is evident from the reactions of interviewees in this study that these are neither dichotomous nor mutually exclusive goals. Whatever the mission of the diversity unit is, high-level executives must be involved and champion the programme. ‘Top management support for diversity is certainly critical. Management needs to begin the process of unfreezing the current culture by changing the system within which it operates’ (Allen and Montgomery, 2001: 154). Implications This review of corporate members’ perceptions raises a variety of concepts that in their application must be context dependent. ‘Organizational leaders also need to examine their internal and external environments to adopt an approach to implementation that matches their particular context or with a context they believe will emerge’ (Dass and Parker, 1999: 78). There is no single best set of concepts or way of dealing with diversity management. Each organization inheres its own unique demographic features. In any effort to understand the attitude toward diversity programmes that exists in the contemporary corporate environment it seems that the appropriate focus is upon executives and their influence on the sort of diversity programming selected to fit their © 2004 Sandra Oliver for editorial matter and selection; individual chapters, the contributors

organization. Effective approaches to diversity management are strategic and focused on goals that are achievable. The key to the evolution of a diversity programme to an ‘integration and learning’ perspective, which produces cultural change, is the ability to effectively talk through the dimensions of difference in the organization. An organization that develops the ability to discuss diversity in a manner that approaches dialogue, will also accomplish better diversity training and performance evaluation. From the perspective of the corporate communication professional the existence of a valued and effective diversity programme is a significant element to be communicated to corporate stakeholders. In order to reduce uncertainty for organizational stakeholders, the programme rationale must be clearly explained and reinforced. A cohesive plan and programme is essential to anticipate and answer the objections that arise from internal backlash, stockholder alarm, and internal resistance to the allocation of resources to diversity programming. In both the planning and the operationalization of the diversity programme a sense of high aspirations and transparency should be evident. Summary Diversity programmes have become an expected element in the modern corporation because of the reality of the varied demographics of organization members, stakeholders and potential clients. However, most corporate diversity directors are not satisfied with the progress made by their own diversity programme. Diversity personnel feel that managers must develop greater sensitivity to how their diversity personnel are evaluated and led. Many organization members are ignorant of both the nature of the programme in their corporation and the dimensions of difference that have an impact on members’ behaviour. Consequently, there is a challenge to find ways of developing a mature understanding of diversity within the corporate setting. Concepts such as individualism– collectivism, worldview, and mindset can be employed to provide a basic conceptualization of difference in the attempt to improve intercultural communication competence in the organization. The promotion of true dialogue regarding diversity differences, the existence of substantive diversity training, and application of diversity concepts in the conduct of performance evaluation are essential elements of an effective diversity programme. Corporations have made progress in addressing the basic programme role of working to eliminate discrimination and promote fairness. The second role of ensuring ‘access and legitimacy’ is also largely in place. But there is a need to move to integration and learning perspectives that will enable meaningful dialogue on diversity issues to occur. REFERENCES Aldefer, C. and Smith, K. (1982) ‘Studying intergroup relations embedded in organizations’, Administrative Science Quarterly 27, 35–65. Allen, R. and Montgomery, K. (2001) ‘Applying an organizational development approach to creating diversity’, Organisational Dynamics, 30, 149–61. Arai, M., Wanca-Thibault, M. and Schockley-Zalabak, P. (2001) ‘Communication theory and training approaches for multiculturally diverse © 2004 Sandra Oliver for editorial matter and selection; individual chapters, the contributors

organization. Effective approaches to diversity<br />

management are strategic <strong>and</strong> focused on<br />

goals that are achievable.<br />

The key to the evolution <strong>of</strong> a diversity<br />

programme to an ‘integration <strong>and</strong> learning’<br />

perspective, which produces cultural change,<br />

is the ability to effectively talk through the<br />

dimensions <strong>of</strong> difference in the organization.<br />

An organization that develops the ability to<br />

discuss diversity in a manner that approaches<br />

dialogue, will also accomplish better diversity<br />

training <strong>and</strong> performance evaluation.<br />

From the perspective <strong>of</strong> the corporate communication<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essional the existence <strong>of</strong> a<br />

valued <strong>and</strong> effective diversity programme<br />

is a significant element to be communicated<br />

to corporate stakeholders. In order to reduce<br />

uncertainty for organizational stakeholders,<br />

the programme rationale must be clearly<br />

explained <strong>and</strong> reinforced. A cohesive plan <strong>and</strong><br />

programme is essential to anticipate <strong>and</strong><br />

answer the objections that arise from internal<br />

backlash, stockholder alarm, <strong>and</strong> internal<br />

resistance to the allocation <strong>of</strong> resources to<br />

diversity programming. In both the planning<br />

<strong>and</strong> the operationalization <strong>of</strong> the diversity<br />

programme a sense <strong>of</strong> high aspirations <strong>and</strong><br />

transparency should be evident.<br />

Summary<br />

Diversity programmes have become an<br />

expected element in the modern corporation<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the reality <strong>of</strong> the varied demographics<br />

<strong>of</strong> organization members, stakeholders<br />

<strong>and</strong> potential clients. However, most<br />

corporate diversity directors are not satisfied<br />

with the progress made by their own diversity<br />

programme. Diversity personnel feel that<br />

managers must develop greater sensitivity to<br />

how their diversity personnel are evaluated<br />

<strong>and</strong> led. Many organization members are<br />

ignorant <strong>of</strong> both the nature <strong>of</strong> the programme<br />

in their corporation <strong>and</strong> the dimensions <strong>of</strong><br />

difference that have an impact on members’<br />

behaviour. Consequently, there is a challenge<br />

to find ways <strong>of</strong> developing a mature underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

<strong>of</strong> diversity within the corporate<br />

setting. Concepts such as individualism–<br />

collectivism, worldview, <strong>and</strong> mindset can be<br />

employed to provide a basic conceptualization<br />

<strong>of</strong> difference in the attempt to improve<br />

intercultural communication competence in<br />

the organization. The promotion <strong>of</strong> true<br />

dialogue regarding diversity differences, the<br />

existence <strong>of</strong> substantive diversity training,<br />

<strong>and</strong> application <strong>of</strong> diversity concepts in the<br />

conduct <strong>of</strong> performance evaluation are essential<br />

elements <strong>of</strong> an effective diversity programme.<br />

Corporations have made progress in<br />

addressing the basic programme role <strong>of</strong> working<br />

to eliminate discrimination <strong>and</strong> promote<br />

fairness. The second role <strong>of</strong> ensuring ‘access<br />

<strong>and</strong> legitimacy’ is also largely in place. But<br />

there is a need to move to integration <strong>and</strong><br />

learning perspectives that will enable meaningful<br />

dialogue on diversity issues to occur.<br />

REFERENCES<br />

Aldefer, C. <strong>and</strong> Smith, K. (1982) ‘Studying intergroup<br />

relations embedded in organizations’, Administrative<br />

Science Quarterly 27, 35–65.<br />

Allen, R. <strong>and</strong> Montgomery, K. (2001) ‘Applying an<br />

organizational development approach to creating<br />

diversity’, Organisational Dynamics, 30,<br />

149–61.<br />

Arai, M., Wanca-Thibault, M. <strong>and</strong> Schockley-Zalabak,<br />

P. (2001) ‘<strong>Communication</strong> theory <strong>and</strong> training<br />

approaches for multiculturally diverse<br />

© 2004 S<strong>and</strong>ra Oliver for editorial matter <strong>and</strong> selection;<br />

individual chapters, the contributors

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!