31.12.2014 Views

Handbook of Corporate Communication and Public ... - Blogs Unpad

Handbook of Corporate Communication and Public ... - Blogs Unpad

Handbook of Corporate Communication and Public ... - Blogs Unpad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

• Do you agree the events <strong>of</strong> September 11,<br />

2001 have had any impact on your<br />

organization’s public relations <strong>and</strong> communications<br />

function<br />

Analysis <strong>of</strong> the October data suggested the<br />

terrorist attacks might have precipitated a<br />

paradigm shift advancing communication <strong>and</strong><br />

public relations into a more significant role<br />

in corporate America. Furthermore, some<br />

evidence suggested the events <strong>of</strong> September<br />

11 triggered some executive leadership teams<br />

within many companies to become more<br />

aware <strong>of</strong> the importance <strong>of</strong> communicating<br />

openly, effectively, <strong>and</strong> in a timely manner.<br />

Consequently, these two questions became<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the March questionnaire.<br />

• Do you agree the September 11, 2001,<br />

terrorist attacks precipitated a paradigm<br />

shift advancing communications <strong>and</strong><br />

public relations into a more significant<br />

role in corporate America<br />

• Do you agree your company’s executive<br />

teams have been more aware <strong>of</strong> the<br />

importance <strong>of</strong> communicating openly,<br />

effectively, <strong>and</strong> in a timely manner since<br />

September 11, 2001<br />

March respondents also were invited to<br />

answer this open-ended question: ‘In the<br />

space below, please feel free to <strong>of</strong>fer any comments<br />

regarding the impact the events <strong>of</strong><br />

9–11–2001 have had on public relations <strong>and</strong><br />

corporate communications.’<br />

Qualitative methods<br />

In addition to the study’s quantitative measures,<br />

data also were gathered through a variety<br />

<strong>of</strong> qualitative methods. These included<br />

responses to open-ended questions on the<br />

October <strong>and</strong> March email questionnaires;<br />

email conversational interviews with subjects<br />

who entered into periodic, electronic dialogue<br />

with the researcher; plus several telephone<br />

<strong>and</strong> personal interviews with subjects in this<br />

study. Qualitative data gathering began in<br />

September 2001 <strong>and</strong> continued up to March<br />

2002.<br />

Data analysis<br />

Quantitative responses were imported from<br />

the author’s emailbox <strong>and</strong> data were coded<br />

<strong>and</strong> entered into the Statistical Programme for<br />

the Social Sciences (SPSS). Responses to each<br />

question were then broken down into frequency<br />

response percentages <strong>and</strong> means. This<br />

yielded most <strong>of</strong> the information necessary to<br />

describe the study’s findings. Finally, multiple<br />

statistical tests were run on the data in an<br />

attempt to measure for any significant differences<br />

between October <strong>and</strong> March responses.<br />

Specifically, a t-test was run comparing both<br />

<strong>of</strong> these groups <strong>of</strong> respondents. Qualitative<br />

data were analysed via informal content<br />

analysis.<br />

Results <strong>and</strong> discussion<br />

RQ1: Do senior-level corporate public relations<br />

executives believe the events <strong>of</strong><br />

September 11, 2001 changed how their<br />

companies communicate<br />

As Table 20.1 shows, roughly two-thirds <strong>of</strong> the<br />

senior-level, US-based, corporate communication<br />

executives surveyed in this study agree<br />

the tragic events <strong>of</strong> September 11, 2001 have<br />

changed how their companies communicate.<br />

Differences between perceptions in October<br />

2001 <strong>and</strong> March 2002 are minimal, although<br />

© 2004 S<strong>and</strong>ra Oliver for editorial matter <strong>and</strong> selection;<br />

individual chapters, the contributors

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!