Handbook of Corporate Communication and Public ... - Blogs Unpad

Handbook of Corporate Communication and Public ... - Blogs Unpad Handbook of Corporate Communication and Public ... - Blogs Unpad

blogs.unpad.ac.id
from blogs.unpad.ac.id More from this publisher
31.12.2014 Views

Due to the wide range of circumstances which a council may be called upon to deal with, it is neither event nor site specific but is generic in nature. The flexibility that this approach assumes has stood the test of time. The MEP is supported by a department emergency plan, which outlines the procedures to be adopted within each department. Those departmental plans and those of their contractor partners, standardize the layout and ensure a corporate style which everyone understands. MEP and departmental plans are reviewed annually. For a local authority a major emergency exists where the required council response, at the scene or elsewhere, is in excess of that which can be provided by the council operating under normal day or night conditions and/or where special mobilization and organization of council services is necessary. Many emergencies are dealt with by departments under their own departmental emergency arrangements, without the need to activate the major emergency plan. However, whilst events which occur during normal working hours may be dealt with perfectly adequately from within available resources, the same event arising during the early hours of the morning, or at the weekend, may require a major emergency response due to the reduced resources immediately available to deal with it. Back in 1916, the concept of forecasting and planning were called ‘purveyance’ by Fayol who saw it as one of five divisions of the administrative function, while administration was one of six operations to be found in a business, namely technical, commercial, financial, security, accounting and administration. Together these activities are what today we term management. However, Fayol could never have imagined the complexity of managing organizations today when routine organizational activities are disrupted not only internally but externally by what Florence and Kovacic (2001) call ‘the interconnected actions of the major stakeholders’ and when ‘organisational crisis truly become the public concern when defined and influenced by the mass media’. They quote Thurow’s conceptual framework of ‘punctuated equilibrium’, which depicts an organizational crisis as ‘rapid developments characterised by flux, this equilibrium and uncertainty’. Zhu and Blood (1997) offer a four-stage universal model: 1 The build up or pre-crisis period where the symptoms are detectable, such as repeated messages or persistent sets of clues. 2 Crisis breakout – acute crisis which are the initial stages. 3 Abatement or chronicity of the crisis with charges, counter-charges, demonstrations, inquiries, legal actions and the continuing coverage by the mass media. 4 Termination where the organization attempts to get back to normal and where the crisis is no longer a threat to an organization’s operational environment or its constituent publics. The media set the agenda in terms of communication during the crisis lifecycle. Third parties such as the media, play a key role in assessing risk which evolves from research and corporate intelligence. This requires a high degree of trust and confidence as Figure 18.1 indicates. Managerial perception Communication managers often confuse risk assessment with risk perception during message design and implementation, (Susskind © 2004 Sandra Oliver for editorial matter and selection; individual chapters, the contributors

Public confidence in scientists working for: 97% Environmental groups 77% Government Media confidence in scientists working for: 73% Environmental groups 41% Government 64% Industry 38% Industry Who would you trust more to make the right decisions about the environment 39% Euro-politicians 32% UK government Figure 18.1 Monitoring the trust factor Source: Mori, 1995, Third party information expertise and Field, 1996). Perception plays an important part at every stage of monitoring and evaluation of public response. For example, Susskind and Field (in Florence and Kovacic, 2001: 84) suggest six types of anger requiring different responses, namely: when people have been hurt; when people feel threatened by risks not of their own making; when people feel their fundamental beliefs are being challenged; when people feel weak in the face of powerful others; when people believe they have been lied to or duped; and when people strategically display anger to manipulate the reactions of others. Thus, confidence in the quality of information provision and in the perceptions of management relies on what Sopow (1994) calls the critical issues audit based on recognition of the main points (recognizable in key phrases such as unique, new, first, only or last); in quality support through research, evidence, studies and testing methods; and through public linkages which emerge through what people say, what the public demands and strong support (Regester and Larkin, 1997: 32). UK consultants Regester and Larkin’s 1995 UK research audit suggests the organizational priorities based on cost and choice shown in Figure 18.2. A 1994 survey of 250 British companies indicated that employees thought a crisis was more likely to be triggered from outside the organization, rather than inside by management, as shown in Figure 18.3. Florence and Kovacic (2001) suggest three models of crisis communication management. Their market place model argues that crises are caused and solved by economic, political and legal competition; ideologically based models evolving new or evolving social movements; and a public participation model based on co-operation among governments, private industry and the public. Because of the significance of mass media involvement, these authors stress the importance of message strategies; by identifying stages in a crisis, message strategies can be more appropriately put together, up to a point. Of course, unknown variables make a positive risk-theoretical view virtually impossible and so as with models of forecasting, empirical knowledge is built up with experience so that an understanding of the ‘probabilities consequent to © 2004 Sandra Oliver for editorial matter and selection; individual chapters, the contributors

Due to the wide range <strong>of</strong> circumstances<br />

which a council may be called upon to deal<br />

with, it is neither event nor site specific but is<br />

generic in nature. The flexibility that this<br />

approach assumes has stood the test <strong>of</strong> time.<br />

The MEP is supported by a department<br />

emergency plan, which outlines the procedures<br />

to be adopted within each department.<br />

Those departmental plans <strong>and</strong> those <strong>of</strong> their<br />

contractor partners, st<strong>and</strong>ardize the layout<br />

<strong>and</strong> ensure a corporate style which everyone<br />

underst<strong>and</strong>s. MEP <strong>and</strong> departmental plans are<br />

reviewed annually.<br />

For a local authority a major emergency<br />

exists where the required council response, at<br />

the scene or elsewhere, is in excess <strong>of</strong> that<br />

which can be provided by the council operating<br />

under normal day or night conditions<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or where special mobilization <strong>and</strong> organization<br />

<strong>of</strong> council services is necessary.<br />

Many emergencies are dealt with by<br />

departments under their own departmental<br />

emergency arrangements, without the need to<br />

activate the major emergency plan. However,<br />

whilst events which occur during normal<br />

working hours may be dealt with perfectly<br />

adequately from within available resources,<br />

the same event arising during the early hours<br />

<strong>of</strong> the morning, or at the weekend, may<br />

require a major emergency response due to<br />

the reduced resources immediately available<br />

to deal with it.<br />

Back in 1916, the concept <strong>of</strong> forecasting<br />

<strong>and</strong> planning were called ‘purveyance’ by<br />

Fayol who saw it as one <strong>of</strong> five divisions <strong>of</strong> the<br />

administrative function, while administration<br />

was one <strong>of</strong> six operations to be found in a<br />

business, namely technical, commercial,<br />

financial, security, accounting <strong>and</strong> administration.<br />

Together these activities are what today<br />

we term management. However, Fayol could<br />

never have imagined the complexity <strong>of</strong> managing<br />

organizations today when routine<br />

organizational activities are disrupted not only<br />

internally but externally by what Florence <strong>and</strong><br />

Kovacic (2001) call ‘the interconnected<br />

actions <strong>of</strong> the major stakeholders’ <strong>and</strong> when<br />

‘organisational crisis truly become the public<br />

concern when defined <strong>and</strong> influenced by the<br />

mass media’. They quote Thurow’s conceptual<br />

framework <strong>of</strong> ‘punctuated equilibrium’,<br />

which depicts an organizational crisis as ‘rapid<br />

developments characterised by flux, this equilibrium<br />

<strong>and</strong> uncertainty’. Zhu <strong>and</strong> Blood<br />

(1997) <strong>of</strong>fer a four-stage universal model:<br />

1 The build up or pre-crisis period where<br />

the symptoms are detectable, such as<br />

repeated messages or persistent sets <strong>of</strong><br />

clues.<br />

2 Crisis breakout – acute crisis which are the<br />

initial stages.<br />

3 Abatement or chronicity <strong>of</strong> the crisis with<br />

charges, counter-charges, demonstrations,<br />

inquiries, legal actions <strong>and</strong> the continuing<br />

coverage by the mass media.<br />

4 Termination where the organization<br />

attempts to get back to normal <strong>and</strong> where<br />

the crisis is no longer a threat to an organization’s<br />

operational environment or its<br />

constituent publics. The media set the<br />

agenda in terms <strong>of</strong> communication during<br />

the crisis lifecycle.<br />

Third parties such as the media, play a key<br />

role in assessing risk which evolves from<br />

research <strong>and</strong> corporate intelligence. This<br />

requires a high degree <strong>of</strong> trust <strong>and</strong> confidence<br />

as Figure 18.1 indicates.<br />

Managerial perception<br />

<strong>Communication</strong> managers <strong>of</strong>ten confuse risk<br />

assessment with risk perception during message<br />

design <strong>and</strong> implementation, (Susskind<br />

© 2004 S<strong>and</strong>ra Oliver for editorial matter <strong>and</strong> selection;<br />

individual chapters, the contributors

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!