31.12.2014 Views

Handbook of Corporate Communication and Public ... - Blogs Unpad

Handbook of Corporate Communication and Public ... - Blogs Unpad

Handbook of Corporate Communication and Public ... - Blogs Unpad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Corporate</strong> communication involves the<br />

organization’s need to communicate in three<br />

basic forms: marketing, organization <strong>and</strong><br />

management (Van Riel 1995). Arguing the<br />

management positioning <strong>of</strong> CorpCom, Van<br />

Riel suggests that communication is an indispensable<br />

management tool. Supporting<br />

the management functionality <strong>of</strong> CorpCom,<br />

Dolphin (1999) says that CorpCom is an<br />

approach rather than a technique.<br />

It has developed into an essential management<br />

discipline. It is an approach that sets<br />

out to ensure the consistency <strong>of</strong> the corporate<br />

message <strong>and</strong> the transparency <strong>of</strong> the<br />

organization. It is a function that anticipates<br />

issues, events <strong>and</strong> crises before they occur.<br />

Through its messages <strong>and</strong> theme the organization<br />

conveys its designed image <strong>and</strong><br />

person. Thus through commutation the<br />

organization functions, its character <strong>and</strong><br />

mentality take on a life <strong>and</strong> form <strong>and</strong> it<br />

becomes known to its various audiences.<br />

(Dolphin, 1999)<br />

Campbell <strong>and</strong> Yeung in Oliver (1997) purports<br />

that<br />

by being clear <strong>of</strong> the need to have a mission,<br />

the need to create a relationship<br />

between strategy <strong>and</strong> articulate behaviour<br />

st<strong>and</strong>ards, managers avoid the superficial<br />

attitude to mission <strong>and</strong> continue the analysis,<br />

thinking <strong>and</strong> experimentation for long<br />

enough to develop the mission that builds<br />

‘a great company’. This is CorpCom at its<br />

most basic marginalized pr<strong>of</strong>essional level<br />

but being incorporated as a core activity for<br />

line management.<br />

Oliver demonstrates this paradigm shift in the<br />

assessment framework (Figure 6.2).<br />

Openly (1982) (in Heath, 1994) states that<br />

information increases identification <strong>and</strong> he<br />

suggests employees identify with an organization<br />

<strong>and</strong> become committed to it as they feel<br />

they have sufficient information to make decisions.<br />

Could this theory be adopted <strong>and</strong><br />

applied effectively to director responsibility in<br />

terms <strong>of</strong> the responsibility for CorpCom at<br />

governance in unquoted <strong>and</strong> quoted enterprises<br />

For this chapter to propose such a view<br />

it is important to address the functionalities<br />

associated with governance issues in both the<br />

listed <strong>and</strong> unquoted enterprises, <strong>and</strong> in family<br />

4 Range <strong>of</strong> applications<br />

5 <strong>Communication</strong> qualities<br />

3 Performance criteria<br />

A national st<strong>and</strong>ard for<br />

corporate communication<br />

6 Evidence requirements<br />

2 The communication process<br />

7 Knowledge <strong>and</strong> underst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

Figure 6.2 Assessment framework<br />

Source: Oliver, S. M. (1997)<br />

1 <strong>Corporate</strong> communication activities<br />

© 2004 S<strong>and</strong>ra Oliver for editorial matter <strong>and</strong> selection;<br />

individual chapters, the contributors

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!