31.12.2014 Views

Handbook of Corporate Communication and Public ... - Blogs Unpad

Handbook of Corporate Communication and Public ... - Blogs Unpad

Handbook of Corporate Communication and Public ... - Blogs Unpad

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

with a small <strong>and</strong> important number <strong>of</strong> very<br />

large businesses remaining owned <strong>and</strong> controlled<br />

by private families that generate half<br />

<strong>of</strong> all existing <strong>and</strong> newly created jobs. G<strong>of</strong>fee<br />

(1996) reflects on the lack <strong>of</strong> research literature<br />

on family business, stating that there is a<br />

bias towards the study <strong>of</strong> large organizations<br />

as well as an assumption that within these<br />

ownership is widely dispersed: ‘Even where it<br />

is acknowledged that ownership (<strong>and</strong> control)<br />

– once the share structure has been analysed –<br />

remains largely concentrated within a single<br />

private family, such information is rarely<br />

applied to explanations <strong>of</strong> managerial or<br />

organisational behaviour.’<br />

G<strong>of</strong>fee says there is a need to investigate<br />

further the way in which owners <strong>of</strong> family<br />

businesses pursue strategies, which allow for<br />

growth <strong>and</strong> which help them to retain control,<br />

an issue relevant in CorpCom management<br />

<strong>and</strong> in governance. G<strong>of</strong>fee introduces the<br />

Schein Culture <strong>Communication</strong> Framework, a<br />

model that allows founders to get their own<br />

approaches <strong>and</strong> assumptions embedded<br />

within the actions, thoughts <strong>and</strong> feelings <strong>of</strong><br />

others in their business. According to Schein<br />

(1985) (in G<strong>of</strong>fee, 1996), the process involves<br />

both conscious <strong>and</strong> deliberate action in addition<br />

to that which is unconscious <strong>and</strong> unintended.<br />

G<strong>of</strong>fee says there is more to passing<br />

on a family business <strong>and</strong> ensuring continuity<br />

than delegation <strong>and</strong> suggests that the success<br />

<strong>of</strong> this process will ‘be shared by the<br />

(largely unexplored) ability <strong>of</strong> the founder to<br />

create <strong>and</strong> communicate a workable culture:<br />

one which assists members on coping with<br />

environmental realities’. The Schein Culture<br />

<strong>Communication</strong> Framework describes five<br />

‘primary mechanisms’ for embedding <strong>and</strong><br />

reinforcing culture:<br />

1 What leaders pay attention to, measure<br />

<strong>and</strong> control;<br />

2 leader reactions to critical incidents <strong>and</strong><br />

organizational crises;<br />

3 deliberate role modelling, teaching <strong>and</strong><br />

coaching by leaders;<br />

4 criteria for allocation <strong>of</strong> rewards <strong>and</strong><br />

status;<br />

5 criteria for recruitment, selection, promotion,<br />

retirement <strong>and</strong> excommunication.<br />

In addition Schein’s culture communication<br />

framework has five secondary mechanisms:<br />

1 The organizations’ design <strong>and</strong> culture;<br />

2 organizational systems <strong>and</strong> procedures;<br />

3 design <strong>of</strong> physical space, facades <strong>and</strong><br />

buildings:<br />

4 stories, legends, myths <strong>and</strong> parables<br />

about important events <strong>and</strong> people;<br />

5 formal statements <strong>of</strong> organizational philosophy,<br />

creeds <strong>and</strong> charters.<br />

Based on a detailed historical review <strong>of</strong> family<br />

businesses in Great Britain their strengths <strong>and</strong><br />

weaknesses in terms <strong>of</strong> economic development<br />

are discussed <strong>and</strong> comparison is made<br />

between the performance <strong>of</strong> independent<br />

unquoted family <strong>and</strong> non-family companies<br />

in the United Kingdom. Payne (1984) in<br />

Westhead <strong>and</strong> Cowley (1997) concluded that<br />

‘the large public company, which retains<br />

elements <strong>of</strong> family control may retard economic<br />

growth; whereas, on balance, the small<br />

family business possibly promotes economic<br />

growth’.<br />

Daily <strong>and</strong> Dollinger (1992) in (Westhead<br />

<strong>and</strong> Cowling, 1997) argue that owners <strong>of</strong><br />

family firms are more likely to outperform<br />

management controlled non-family firms, <strong>and</strong><br />

Demsetz (1983) (in Westhead <strong>and</strong> Cowling,<br />

1997) justifies <strong>and</strong> supports this view when<br />

he says this is so because owners <strong>of</strong> family<br />

firms are more likely to maximize firm value,<br />

enabling them to personally realize any gains.<br />

© 2004 S<strong>and</strong>ra Oliver for editorial matter <strong>and</strong> selection;<br />

individual chapters, the contributors

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!