31.12.2014 Views

Training package development handbook guidelines

Training package development handbook guidelines

Training package development handbook guidelines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Individual units of competency are not aligned to the AQF; alignment occurs when a group of units<br />

of competency equate to a viable AQF qualification or qualifications. In arriving at an AQF alignment<br />

for groups of units of competency, developers should consult with the relevant industry about the<br />

appropriate use of individual units, including any pre‐requisite relationships.<br />

When referring to units of competency in the <strong>Training</strong> Package Qualification Framework, reference<br />

should be to the specific AQF qualification title such as Certificate I, Certificate II and so on—not to<br />

‘AQF levels’. The AQF has qualifications used in the schools sector sit below Certificate I—therefore<br />

any reference to ‘AQF levels’, for example calling Certificate I ‘Level I’, is potentially confusing and<br />

inaccurate.<br />

There is no requirement that the full range of possible VET sector qualifications should be available<br />

in one <strong>Training</strong> Package. However, developers should consider including Certificate I or II<br />

qualifications to provide entry to the industry and meaningful pathways to further training and<br />

employment. This is particularly important for groups and individuals who may have been<br />

disadvantaged in their access to vocational education and training.<br />

A number of factors will contribute to the ‘user friendliness’ of the explanation of the qualifications<br />

framework for readers of the <strong>Training</strong> Package:<br />

• grouping all of the units of competency that make up a qualification together wherever practical<br />

• clearly stating the number of units required to achieve a particular qualification, avoiding terms<br />

which can be interpreted in various ways, for example maximum or minimum number of units<br />

• using wherever possible the terms listed in the packaging models advice in this document rather<br />

than developing new terms which may confuse some users<br />

• providing a well presented diagram or table showing the relationship between all the identified<br />

qualifications in the <strong>Training</strong> Package and if appropriate any relationships with qualifications<br />

from other endorsed <strong>Training</strong> Packages.<br />

4. Coding and titling for qualifications<br />

<strong>Training</strong> Package qualification codes and titles must comply with the policies in the Online <strong>Training</strong><br />

Package Development Handbook. Each <strong>Training</strong> Package qualification has a unique eight‐character<br />

code. An example is provided below.<br />

AQF<br />

level<br />

}<br />

Year of<br />

endorsement<br />

}<br />

AUM30108 Certificate III in Automotive Manufacturing<br />

}<br />

This identifies the<br />

<strong>Training</strong> Package<br />

(in this case<br />

Automotive)<br />

}<br />

Position in<br />

qualification<br />

sequence<br />

4.1 Coding and titling maintenance for qualifications<br />

If qualifications are added to a <strong>Training</strong> Package during its period of endorsement, developers should<br />

consult the Online <strong>Training</strong> Package Development Handbook.<br />

GuidelinesQualFrameworks_V3_June 2010 V3 June 2010 Page 10 of 28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!