30.12.2014 Views

Case Study - Fielder Plaza Site, Arlington, Texas

Case Study - Fielder Plaza Site, Arlington, Texas

Case Study - Fielder Plaza Site, Arlington, Texas

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Case</strong> <strong>Study</strong> - <strong>Fielder</strong> <strong>Plaza</strong> <strong>Site</strong>,<br />

<strong>Arlington</strong>, <strong>Texas</strong><br />

Remedy Standard Selection and Presumptive<br />

Remedy Screening<br />

• Richard Scharlach. . P.G.<br />

• Technical Specialist<br />

• <strong>Texas</strong> Commission on<br />

Environmental Quality<br />

N<br />

o<br />

v<br />

SCRD November 2009<br />

November 19, 2009


<strong>Case</strong> <strong>Study</strong> - <strong>Fielder</strong> <strong>Plaza</strong> - Outline<br />

• <strong>Site</strong> Location and History<br />

• <strong>Site</strong> Assessment Results<br />

• Regional and <strong>Site</strong> Geology<br />

• <strong>Texas</strong> Risk Reduction Program (TRRP)<br />

• Groundwater Classification and Remedy<br />

Standards<br />

• Goals for FY2010<br />

SCRD November 2009


<strong>Fielder</strong> <strong>Plaza</strong> <strong>Site</strong> – <strong>Arlington</strong> <strong>Texas</strong><br />

• <strong>Arlington</strong> is located in Tarrant County.<br />

• Suburban Dallas / Fort Worth area<br />

SCRD November 2009


Aerial View of <strong>Fielder</strong> <strong>Plaza</strong> and<br />

Surrounding Area<br />

SCRD November 2009


<strong>Fielder</strong> <strong>Plaza</strong> Results of Receptor<br />

Survey<br />

SCRD November 2009


Aerial View of <strong>Fielder</strong> <strong>Plaza</strong><br />

Shopping Center<br />

SCRD November 2009


<strong>Fielder</strong> <strong>Plaza</strong> - <strong>Site</strong> History<br />

• Two former Perc-using Dry Cleaner facilities<br />

-Oak Cleaners /fmr Comet 1 Hr. ( operated1975 –<br />

2004)<br />

-Val-U Cleaners ( operated 1992 – 2005)<br />

• Both are now operating as drop stations.<br />

SCRD November 2009


<strong>Fielder</strong> <strong>Plaza</strong> Shopping Center –<br />

Two Former Dry Cleaner Locations<br />

SCRD November 2009


<strong>Fielder</strong> <strong>Plaza</strong> - <strong>Site</strong> History (Cont’d)<br />

• Extensive <strong>Site</strong> Assessment History (15 years)<br />

• Groundwater assessment completed<br />

• Soil Contamination only at the Comet 1 Hr.<br />

/Oak Cleaners<br />

• Only Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) and<br />

Trichloroethylene (TCE) detected<br />

• One Source or Two<br />

SCRD November 2009


<strong>Fielder</strong> <strong>Plaza</strong> -Soil Data<br />

Chemicals of Concern<br />

(COCs)<br />

Greatest<br />

Concentration<br />

Observed (mg/Kg)<br />

Depth<br />

(ft.)<br />

Boring/Well<br />

Observed<br />

Sample<br />

Date<br />

Tetrachloroethylene<br />

(PCE)<br />

57.3<br />

4<br />

B-1<br />

8/2/1999<br />

Trichloroethylene (TCE)<br />

3.01<br />

3-4<br />

B-2<br />

8/2/1999<br />

Cis-1,2<br />

1,2-<br />

dichloroethylene<br />


<strong>Fielder</strong> <strong>Plaza</strong> – Soil Data Points<br />

SCRD November 2009


<strong>Fielder</strong> <strong>Plaza</strong> - Groundwater Data<br />

Chemicals of<br />

Concern (COCs)<br />

GW GW ING PCL<br />

(mg/L)<br />

Greatest<br />

Concentration<br />

Observed (mg/L)<br />

Well Observed<br />

Date Observed<br />

Tetrachloroethylene<br />

(PCE)<br />

0.005<br />

0.447<br />

MW-14S<br />

12/19/2000<br />

Trichloroethylene<br />

(TCE)<br />

0.005<br />

0.0055<br />

MW-9<br />

6/30/2008<br />

Cis-1,2<br />

1,2-<br />

dichloroethylene<br />

0.07<br />

0.0013<br />

MW-27<br />

1/8/2008<br />

Trans-1,2<br />

1,2-<br />

dichloroethylene<br />

0.1<br />


GroundWater PCLE Excedence<br />

Zone<br />

SCRD November 2009


Regional Geology<br />

• <strong>Site</strong> Geologic Setting:<br />

Top 0 – 10 feet is Navo-Urban loam and clay soils.<br />

Surface soils are underlain by the outcrop of the<br />

Woodbine Formation, which ranges in thickness<br />

from 200 to 250 feet regionally.<br />

The Woodbine aquifer is a minor aquifer of <strong>Texas</strong>,<br />

which was once a historic water supply source for<br />

the City of <strong>Arlington</strong>.<br />

SCRD November 2009


Regional Geologic Map<br />

SCRD November 2009


<strong>Fielder</strong> <strong>Plaza</strong> - Cross Section Location<br />

SCRD November 2009


<strong>Site</strong> Cross Section<br />

SCRD November 2009


<strong>Texas</strong> Risk Reduction Program<br />

Ground Water Classification and Remedy Standards<br />

TRRP Groundwater<br />

Classification<br />

Class 1 Primary Resource<br />

Class 2 Potential Resource<br />

Class 3 Non-Potential Resource<br />

Definition*<br />

-Impact to PWS possible,<br />

-GW unit is only reliable source<br />

< 800 ft bgs<br />

-High yield and low TDS<br />

-Moderate yield and TDS<br />

Low Yield or High TDS<br />

Groundwater Cleanup<br />

Level<br />

Drinking Water Standards<br />

Drinking Water Standards.<br />

Plume Management Zone<br />

(PMZ) Allowed.<br />

100xDrinking Water Standards.<br />

PMZ allowed.<br />

Not a Groundwater-Bearing<br />

Unit<br />

K < 1 x 10-<br />

-5 cm/sec<br />

K < 1 x 10<br />

cm/sec<br />

Drinking Water Standards do<br />

not apply.<br />

SCRD November 2009


TRRP Groundwater Classification<br />

at <strong>Fielder</strong> <strong>Plaza</strong> (Woodbine Aquifer)<br />

• TRRP Groundwater Class 2<br />

• Basis for Groundwater Classification<br />

• Water Quantity: Well Yield 5,000 to 25,000 gpd.<br />

• Water Quality: TDS


TRRP GW Classification and<br />

Remedy Standards at <strong>Fielder</strong> <strong>Plaza</strong><br />

TRRP Groundwater<br />

Classification<br />

Class 1 Primary Resource<br />

Class 2 Potential<br />

Resource<br />

Class 3 Non-Potential<br />

Resource<br />

Definition*<br />

-Impact to PWS possible,<br />

-GW unit is only reliable source <<br />

800 ft bgs<br />

-High yield and low TDS<br />

-Moderate yield and<br />

TDS<br />

Low Yield or High TDS<br />

Groundwater Cleanup<br />

Level<br />

Drinking Water Standards<br />

Drinking Water<br />

Standards<br />

Plume Management<br />

Zone (PMZ) Allowed<br />

100xDrinking Water Standards.<br />

PMZ allowed<br />

Not a Groundwater-Bearing<br />

Unit<br />

Hydaulic Conductivity < 1 x 10<br />

cm/sec<br />

Conductivity < 1 x 10-<br />

-5<br />

SCRD November 2009<br />

Drinking Water Standard do not<br />

apply.


TRRP Remedy Standards Options<br />

• Remedy Standard A –<br />

Decontamination.<br />

Cleanup to Drinking Water Standards<br />

• Remedy Standard B - Closure with<br />

Controls.<br />

Controls. (e.g. Engineered Caps, Land Use<br />

Restrictions, Plume Management Zone PMZ)<br />

SCRD November 2009


Plume Management Zone (PMZ)<br />

Plume Management Zone – a defined area and<br />

depth interval within which institutional controls<br />

are applied to prevent human contact with<br />

affected groundwater. This effectively removes<br />

the groundwater ingestion pathway from<br />

consideration inside the PMZ.<br />

SCRD November 2009


Plume Management Zones – What’s<br />

Required<br />

•Detailed Requirements for Implementation<br />

of a PMZ<br />

•Maximum Allowable Size of a PMZ<br />

•Must be a Contingency Plan in place to<br />

implement addition response actions if plume<br />

is expanding.<br />

SCRD November 2009


TRRP Remedy Standards Options at<br />

• Remedy Standard A:<br />

<strong>Fielder</strong> <strong>Plaza</strong><br />

‣ Cleanup Entire Plume to Drinking Water Standards<br />

• Remedy Standard B:<br />

‣ Establish PMZ for Entire Plume<br />

‣ Establish PMZ for Onsite Portion of Plume and<br />

Cleanup Offsite Portion of Plume to Drinking Water<br />

Standards<br />

SCRD November 2009


Plume Management Zone – Option 1<br />

SCRD November 2009


Plume Management Zone – Option 2<br />

• Include PMZ map with only half of plume in<br />

PMZ<br />

SCRD November 2009


Is Remediation Required if PMZ is<br />

Implemented<br />

• Even if PMZ is implemented – soil and<br />

groundwater remediation will still be required.<br />

SCRD November 2009


<strong>Fielder</strong> <strong>Plaza</strong> - Presumptive Soil<br />

Remedy Options<br />

• In-Situ Chemical Oxidation<br />

• Excavation<br />

• Soil Vapor Extraction<br />

SCRD November 2009


Soil Remedy Options – removed<br />

from consideration<br />

• In-Situ Chemical Oxidation and<br />

Excavation are<br />

are removed from consideration<br />

since most of the affected soils are beneath the<br />

occupied building.<br />

SCRD November 2009


Soil Remedies Selected<br />

• Soil Vapor Extraction:<br />

SVE remediation is recommended at this site<br />

based upon:<br />

• The relatively high permeablility soils (sandy clay<br />

/ fine sand)<br />

SCRD November 2009


Presumptive<br />

Ground Water Remedy Options<br />

• Long Term Monitoring (required for PMZ)<br />

• Bioremediation / Biostimulation<br />

• Permeable Reactive Barriers<br />

• Pump & Treat<br />

SCRD November 2009


Groundwater Remedies – Long<br />

Term Monitoring<br />

• Long-term Monitoring:<br />

Given the relatively large plume and low concentrations of PCE<br />

in groundwater samples, the designation of a Plume<br />

Management Zone (PMZ) and the continued long-term<br />

monitoring of the groundwater are warranted.<br />

SCRD November 2009


Groundwater Remedies –<br />

Bioremediation / Biostimulation<br />

• Bioremediation/Biostimulation<br />

Biostimulation: Based on the<br />

geochemical profiling ( pH, Redox Potential, Dissolved<br />

Oxygen, etc.), the groundwater for this site is not favorable<br />

for natural biodegradation,<br />

• However, the reducing conditions of the aquifer can<br />

possibly be made favorable through Biostimulation.<br />

• Pilot Test Planned for FY10 – Injection of polylactate<br />

biostimulant upgradient of Val-U Cleaners.<br />

SCRD November 2009


Groundwater Remedies –<br />

Contingencies<br />

• Permeable Reactive Barriers (PRBs(<br />

PRBs):<br />

): Could be employed to<br />

mitigate and impede migration of contaminant plumes to the adjacent downgradient<br />

residential area.<br />

• Pump and Treat: As a hydraulic control option<br />

As a hydraulic control option or alternatively, a<br />

extracted groundwater could be extracted, amended with low cost<br />

biostimulants, and re-injected into the formation through an infiltration<br />

trench.<br />

SCRD November 2009


Next Steps – Goals for FY10<br />

• GW Sampling<br />

Perform periodic sampling for COCs and MNA parameters at existing and<br />

new monitoring wells.<br />

• SVE Pilot Testing<br />

For Soil Contamination, conduct pilot test to evaluate the effectiveness and<br />

scalability of SVE for the site.<br />

• Bio-Stimulation Pilot Testing<br />

For Groundwater Contamination, conduct pilot test using HRC-X, and<br />

evaluate long-term influence to down gradient groundwater.<br />

• Sentinel Well Needed<br />

Well #28 will be used to evaluate potential plume migration towards a nearby<br />

residential pond.<br />

SCRD November 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!