30.12.2014 Views

Caspian Report - Issue: 07 - Spring 2014

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

panies are obliged to submit an<br />

environmental impact assessment<br />

to pass the highest environmental<br />

approvements. However, Spain’s<br />

history of excessive bureaucracy<br />

causes doubts about future shale<br />

gas projects. But despite the country’s<br />

heavy dependence on LNG imports,<br />

Spain is tied into relatively<br />

few long-term take-or-pay gas contracts<br />

for pipeline gas. This gives<br />

Spain much commercial flexibility<br />

for its shale gas projects.<br />

Lithuania<br />

For the Baltic states (as with Poland),<br />

the exploration and development of<br />

shale gas projects represent an important<br />

strategy for diversifying gas<br />

supplies, to reduce their gas dependence<br />

on Russia and to access much<br />

cheaper gas than the expensive Gazprom<br />

imports.<br />

After Poland, Romania, and Ukraine,<br />

Lithuania is considered as the fourth<br />

most attractive country for shale<br />

gas production in Central Eastern.<br />

Lithuania could hold 480 bcm of<br />

unconventional gas with around<br />

recoverable 120 bcm. If these unconventional<br />

gas reserve estimates<br />

are confirmed, Lithuania - consuming<br />

3.4 bcm in 2011 (all supplied by<br />

Gazprom) - could supply its domestic<br />

gas demand for the next 30-40 years.<br />

After Poland, Romania, and Ukraine, Lithuania<br />

is considered as the fourth most attractive<br />

country for shale gas production in Central<br />

Eastern.<br />

Lithuania was the first Baltic state<br />

to announce a shale gas tender<br />

in June 2012. In September 2013,<br />

Chevron won a tender for a license<br />

to explore shale gas resources. But<br />

few weeks afterwards, Chevron retreated.<br />

The investment and legal<br />

regulations adopted by the Lithuanian<br />

government shortly after the<br />

tender included chaotic changes to<br />

the legal, fiscal and regulatory frameworks<br />

(due to a lack of governmental<br />

coordination, which made the<br />

tender increasingly less attractive<br />

and commercially viable. Chevron’s<br />

withdrawal considerably damaged<br />

Lithuanian’s pursuit of energy independence,<br />

or at least its aim for<br />

reducing gas imports from Russia.<br />

It has also damaged the national<br />

economy by deterring other foreign<br />

investors. But it did reveal that the<br />

government did not seek to obtain a<br />

broad base of public support. Nonetheless,<br />

the government remains optimistic<br />

that a new tender will attract<br />

serious investors.<br />

Romania<br />

Bulgaria, Romania and Hungary<br />

have around 538 bcm of technically<br />

recoverable shale gas reserves. Romania’s<br />

annual gas consumption<br />

is 13-14 bcm, most of which it can<br />

cover with its own significant gas<br />

reserves – unlike many of the neighbouring<br />

Balkan countries. In 2012,<br />

Romania imported 2.17 bcm of gas<br />

from Gazprom. Despite a temporary<br />

until the beginning of 2013, the<br />

Romanian government continued<br />

its negotiations with Chevron for a<br />

shale gas exploration project in Constanta<br />

County. In December 2012,<br />

the Hungarian energy company MOL<br />

and Canada’s East West Petroleum<br />

also obtained exploration licenses<br />

75<br />

CASPIAN REPORT, SPRING <strong>2014</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!