Caspian Report - Issue: 07 - Spring 2014
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
panies are obliged to submit an<br />
environmental impact assessment<br />
to pass the highest environmental<br />
approvements. However, Spain’s<br />
history of excessive bureaucracy<br />
causes doubts about future shale<br />
gas projects. But despite the country’s<br />
heavy dependence on LNG imports,<br />
Spain is tied into relatively<br />
few long-term take-or-pay gas contracts<br />
for pipeline gas. This gives<br />
Spain much commercial flexibility<br />
for its shale gas projects.<br />
Lithuania<br />
For the Baltic states (as with Poland),<br />
the exploration and development of<br />
shale gas projects represent an important<br />
strategy for diversifying gas<br />
supplies, to reduce their gas dependence<br />
on Russia and to access much<br />
cheaper gas than the expensive Gazprom<br />
imports.<br />
After Poland, Romania, and Ukraine,<br />
Lithuania is considered as the fourth<br />
most attractive country for shale<br />
gas production in Central Eastern.<br />
Lithuania could hold 480 bcm of<br />
unconventional gas with around<br />
recoverable 120 bcm. If these unconventional<br />
gas reserve estimates<br />
are confirmed, Lithuania - consuming<br />
3.4 bcm in 2011 (all supplied by<br />
Gazprom) - could supply its domestic<br />
gas demand for the next 30-40 years.<br />
After Poland, Romania, and Ukraine, Lithuania<br />
is considered as the fourth most attractive<br />
country for shale gas production in Central<br />
Eastern.<br />
Lithuania was the first Baltic state<br />
to announce a shale gas tender<br />
in June 2012. In September 2013,<br />
Chevron won a tender for a license<br />
to explore shale gas resources. But<br />
few weeks afterwards, Chevron retreated.<br />
The investment and legal<br />
regulations adopted by the Lithuanian<br />
government shortly after the<br />
tender included chaotic changes to<br />
the legal, fiscal and regulatory frameworks<br />
(due to a lack of governmental<br />
coordination, which made the<br />
tender increasingly less attractive<br />
and commercially viable. Chevron’s<br />
withdrawal considerably damaged<br />
Lithuanian’s pursuit of energy independence,<br />
or at least its aim for<br />
reducing gas imports from Russia.<br />
It has also damaged the national<br />
economy by deterring other foreign<br />
investors. But it did reveal that the<br />
government did not seek to obtain a<br />
broad base of public support. Nonetheless,<br />
the government remains optimistic<br />
that a new tender will attract<br />
serious investors.<br />
Romania<br />
Bulgaria, Romania and Hungary<br />
have around 538 bcm of technically<br />
recoverable shale gas reserves. Romania’s<br />
annual gas consumption<br />
is 13-14 bcm, most of which it can<br />
cover with its own significant gas<br />
reserves – unlike many of the neighbouring<br />
Balkan countries. In 2012,<br />
Romania imported 2.17 bcm of gas<br />
from Gazprom. Despite a temporary<br />
until the beginning of 2013, the<br />
Romanian government continued<br />
its negotiations with Chevron for a<br />
shale gas exploration project in Constanta<br />
County. In December 2012,<br />
the Hungarian energy company MOL<br />
and Canada’s East West Petroleum<br />
also obtained exploration licenses<br />
75<br />
CASPIAN REPORT, SPRING <strong>2014</strong>