Caspian Report - Issue: 07 - Spring 2014
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Mehmet AkIf Okur<br />
62<br />
It is possible to estimate the extent<br />
of the current concerns and expectations<br />
by looking at the geopolitical<br />
shockwaves across the Middle East<br />
following the signing of the interim<br />
agreement. Some Gulf countries<br />
think that the U.S. commitment to<br />
their security will soften and there<br />
will be more space for Iran. Those<br />
countries, particularly Saudi Arabia,<br />
have already embarked on a quest:<br />
the increasing interaction with Russia<br />
and China, and the struggle to<br />
determine a common position with<br />
Israel, demonstrates the complexity<br />
of the balances in the Middle East.<br />
Of course, Turkey will be among the<br />
most affected countries in terms of<br />
the consequences of either the U.S.-<br />
Iran rapprochement or an escalating<br />
conflict environment. The question<br />
being asked is: “Which Iran would be<br />
better to have as a neighbour” The<br />
multiplicity of future routes makes<br />
it harder to find simple answers.<br />
Nonetheless, setting aside the risk<br />
of ignoring the details and minor<br />
scenarios, we can talk about three<br />
major possibilities. If no agreement<br />
is signed after the negotiations, we<br />
should consider that the government<br />
bloc we face in Syria, Iraq and<br />
other areas will likely strengthen its<br />
position in Tehran. Ankara found an<br />
opportunity to test its strengths and<br />
weaknesses against Iran in the context<br />
of the Syrian civil war. As a member<br />
of the Western alliance, Turkey<br />
is a big power with a developed<br />
economy and qualified population.<br />
The same thing applies to its military<br />
capabilities. Turkey has built its security<br />
infrastructure on the basis of<br />
its alliances, and it has a protective<br />
shield as long as it avoids conflict<br />
with its current alliance structure.<br />
However, being a part of a system<br />
also entails some restrictions. We<br />
do not have the confidence of Iran,<br />
which can conduct proxy wars by<br />
organizing armed groups outside its<br />
borders. It is extremely difficult for<br />
us to carry out such activities without<br />
abandoning our pro-global system<br />
position. If Ankara cannot build<br />
Turkish capacity to catch up with the<br />
opponent in their areas of advantage,<br />
the best way is to encounter the opponent<br />
across platforms that will<br />
limit its current capabilities. We can<br />
predict that a transformation that<br />
pushes Iran toward integration into<br />
the international order will bring<br />
Ankara’s advantages to the forefront<br />
in the Turkey - Iran competition.<br />
The second scenario foresees that<br />
Iran will conclude the nuclear negotiations<br />
with an agreement, and<br />
develop pragmatic cooperation with<br />
the West while protecting its alliances<br />
and extensions in the Middle<br />
East. In this case, Iran will continue<br />
to utilise the qualifications and capacities<br />
that give it asymmetric advantages<br />
against Turkey, far from<br />
the reach of the West. Above all, if<br />
the U.S. and Iran succeed in adopting<br />
an approach that sees them fighting<br />
against “common enemies”, the balance<br />
of power will be disturbed in<br />
ways that affect Turkey.<br />
In the latter scenario, it is assumed<br />
that Iran will begin to resemble<br />
Turkey with a transformation both<br />
in the domestic and international<br />
level through integration into the<br />
global system. A scenario whereby<br />
Iran relinquishes the interventions<br />
and operations that it currently car-