Caspian Report - Issue: 07 - Spring 2014
View of the old town Ostuni, Puglia, Italy. Davide Tabarelli 50 ers, some 200 billion cubic meters per year (bcm/y) of additional gas up to 2030. Russia will not be able to cover the full scope of this demand, and there will be plenty of room left for gas supplies through South Stream, the other gigantic gas line that will bring Siberian gas to Europe through the so-called northern corridor. Thus, we should ask ourselves why this project is facing such a fierce opposition from the South of Italy. The answer is complex, with its roots reaching back centuries into the history of the poorest part of the country, where economic development, imposed from central governments with controversial results, has never been really achieved. Lagging behind the rest of the EU, the south of Italy is one of the weakest parts of the EU, with average levels of unemployment close to 20%, reaching peaks of 40% among the youngest. Emigration from has been a constant feature of the past century and has re-emerged as a major trend with the latest economic crisis forcing thousands of people to look for jobs abroad. Experience teaches us that as a territory develops, its inhabitants become increasingly familiar with industrial infrastructures, and thus it is more likely that the realisation of a new project will succeed. What has often happened in the past is that investors in the southern Italian regions anticipated a welcome from local authorities and people, since they thought they were bringing new opportunities for local development. But in the last few years, the opposite has happened. A very strong negative perception of any kind of industry grew in precisely those poor areas where industrial development could have helped most. This is a common problem all over Italy, where the media tends to focus on the negative impacts connected to pollution, deaths, and contamination. Due to this negative campaigning, factories, or any kind of investment, are seen as bringing harmful changes. As a consequence, the positive impacts on employment and economic development are ignored. Apulia Region has a complex relationship with industrial infrastructures,
as illustrated by the Ilva case. Ilva is Europe’s biggest steel factory, located near Taranto, 130 km from San Foca, and owned by the Riva Group, one of world’s largest steelmakers. In July 2012, Ilva was forced to close after a judge ordered an asset freeze in an environmental probe. The court dispute centres on studies suggesting that up to 386 people might have died of cancer over the past 13 years, and that people living downwind of fumes from the plant have suffered negative health effects. The history of the Ilva industrial complex dates back to the beginning of the 20th century. The developments of July 2012 are a single chapter in a very long struggle involving the plant’s high pollution levels, environmental risks and employment issues: the factory employed some 12,000 workers, and it was the largest private employer in the Apulia Region. The needs and the feelings of the local population on the subject were expressed on April 14, 2013, when a referendum on the future of Ilva took place. Asked if they wanted the plant to shut down i, the majority of the population (80.4%) did not vote, indirectly supporting the preservation of workplaces. The big coal plant of Cerano, located 10 km south of Brindisi and 40 km north of Melodugno, also faces heavy criticism. It is a 2,600 MW plant that burns imported coal. Given the low price of coal compared to gas, it is running at full speed. According to environmentalists, it is one of Europe’s most polluting plants. In reality it is an efficient and modern plant emitting a lot of CO 2 simply because it produces a lot of electricity using large quantities of fossil fuel. Brindisi is famous for its international gas industry, particularly for Brindisi is famous for its international gas industry, particularly for the LNG terminal that BG fought - unsuccessfully - to build for almost a decade. the LNG terminal that BG fought - unsuccessfully - to build for almost a decade. The project, along with ten more all over Italy, was drawn up at the beginning of the 1970s and. Then, having been forgotten for years, it was resurrected in 2000 by the UK gas company. At the beginning, the proposal was welcomed, but immediately delays emerged. In August 2001, the UK Prime Minister Tony Blair sent a letter to the Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi complaining about the delays in the development of the project. The Berlusconi government then forced Enel, the Italian power utility, to enter into the project, in a bid to speed up the process. However, that did not happen, and later in 2005, Enel, having understood the difficulties facing the LNG terminal, decided to drop out. Despite all the legislative and bureaucratic hurdles, the British company succeeded in obtaining the relevant authorisations from local authorities, but new elections in 2006 brought a new administration that rejected and appealed against it. Then, an investigation into bribes paid to obtain the first authorisation was launched, bringing further problems. The drop in domestic gas consumption, linked to the 2008 economic crisis, made the project much less attractive. Finally, in March 2012, after eleven years and an investment 51 CASPIAN REPORT, SPRING 2014
- Page 1: caspian published by caspıan strat
- Page 4 and 5: CASPIAN Report 2 The urgent need to
- Page 6 and 7: caspian CASPIAN Report 4 06 AHMET Y
- Page 8 and 9: AHMET YUKLEYEN 6 Afghanistan’s Un
- Page 10 and 11: AHMET YUKLEYEN 8 In Afghanistan’s
- Page 12 and 13: AHMET YUKLEYEN 10 want to face the
- Page 14 and 15: AHMET YUKLEYEN 12 In short, ANF has
- Page 16 and 17: US President Barack Obama holds a b
- Page 18 and 19: AHMET YUKLEYEN 16 The second big ch
- Page 20 and 21: AHMET YUKLEYEN 18 beards and long t
- Page 22 and 23: Anti-war demonstrators rally near t
- Page 24 and 25: Matteo Verda 22 CONTRIBUTION OF Tra
- Page 26 and 27: Matteo Verda 24 TAP will be a 760 k
- Page 28 and 29: SHAREHOLDER STRUCTURE OF TAP Matteo
- Page 30 and 31: Matteo Verda 28 Azerbaijani gas wil
- Page 32 and 33: Matteo Verda 30 In the end, the via
- Page 34 and 35: Aura Sabadus 32 Southern Gas Corrid
- Page 36 and 37: Aura Sabadus 34 Russian-backed riva
- Page 38 and 39: Aura Sabadus 36 The criticism has g
- Page 40 and 41: Aura Sabadus 38 other large rival t
- Page 42 and 43: Aura Sabadus 40 player by selling v
- Page 44 and 45: and possibly further to Europe, alt
- Page 46 and 47: Aura Sabadus 44 The Southern Gas Co
- Page 48 and 49: Davide Tabarelli 46 Environmental e
- Page 50 and 51: Davide Tabarelli 48 evaluate potent
- Page 54 and 55: Davide Tabarelli 52 of some 200 mil
- Page 56 and 57: Iran Nuclear Negotiations and Turke
- Page 58 and 59: Mehmet AkIf Okur 56 posal stated th
- Page 60 and 61: Iranian President Hassan Rouhani an
- Page 62 and 63: Mehmet AkIf Okur 60 The steps that
- Page 64 and 65: Mehmet AkIf Okur 62 It is possible
- Page 66 and 67: Frank Umbach 64 Strategic Perspecti
- Page 68 and 69: Frank Umbach 66 Many of the shale g
- Page 70 and 71: Frank Umbach 68 are considerably hi
- Page 72 and 73: Frank Umbach 70 The UK government i
- Page 74 and 75: With Russia’s President Vladimir
- Page 76 and 77: Frank Umbach 74 During the last thr
- Page 78 and 79: Frank Umbach 76 approved by the gov
- Page 80 and 81: Shale gas drilling rig. Frank Umbac
- Page 82 and 83: THE IMPORTANCE OF TAP FOR ITALY SOM
- Page 84 and 85: AntonIo SIleo 82 the end of 2011, g
- Page 86 and 87: AntonIo SIleo 84 Power generation o
- Page 88 and 89: ily limited because of the emergenc
- Page 90 and 91: AntonIo SIleo 88 ductant chemical r
- Page 92 and 93: AntonIo SIleo 90 emerge as a signif
- Page 94 and 95: Radu Dudau 92 Romania’s Energy St
- Page 96 and 97: Radu Dudau 94 countries pay for Rus
- Page 98 and 99: Radu Dudau 96 This industry, howeve
- Page 100 and 101: Radu Dudau 98 de facto monopolies i
as illustrated by the Ilva case. Ilva is<br />
Europe’s biggest steel factory, located<br />
near Taranto, 130 km from San Foca,<br />
and owned by the Riva Group, one of<br />
world’s largest steelmakers. In July<br />
2012, Ilva was forced to close after<br />
a judge ordered an asset freeze in<br />
an environmental probe. The court<br />
dispute centres on studies suggesting<br />
that up to 386 people might have<br />
died of cancer over the past 13 years,<br />
and that people living downwind of<br />
fumes from the plant have suffered<br />
negative health effects. The history<br />
of the Ilva industrial complex dates<br />
back to the beginning of the 20th century.<br />
The developments of July 2012<br />
are a single chapter in a very long<br />
struggle involving the plant’s high<br />
pollution levels, environmental risks<br />
and employment issues: the factory<br />
employed some 12,000 workers, and<br />
it was the largest private employer<br />
in the Apulia Region. The needs and<br />
the feelings of the local population on<br />
the subject were expressed on April<br />
14, 2013, when a referendum on the<br />
future of Ilva took place. Asked if they<br />
wanted the plant to shut down i, the<br />
majority of the population (80.4%)<br />
did not vote, indirectly supporting<br />
the preservation of workplaces.<br />
The big coal plant of Cerano, located<br />
10 km south of Brindisi and 40 km<br />
north of Melodugno, also faces heavy<br />
criticism. It is a 2,600 MW plant that<br />
burns imported coal. Given the low<br />
price of coal compared to gas, it is<br />
running at full speed. According to<br />
environmentalists, it is one of Europe’s<br />
most polluting plants. In reality<br />
it is an efficient and modern plant<br />
emitting a lot of CO 2<br />
simply because<br />
it produces a lot of electricity using<br />
large quantities of fossil fuel.<br />
Brindisi is famous for its international<br />
gas industry, particularly for<br />
Brindisi is famous for its international gas<br />
industry, particularly for the LNG terminal<br />
that BG fought - unsuccessfully - to build for<br />
almost a decade.<br />
the LNG terminal that BG fought - unsuccessfully<br />
- to build for almost a<br />
decade. The project, along with ten<br />
more all over Italy, was drawn up at<br />
the beginning of the 1970s and. Then,<br />
having been forgotten for years, it<br />
was resurrected in 2000 by the UK<br />
gas company. At the beginning, the<br />
proposal was welcomed, but immediately<br />
delays emerged. In August 2001,<br />
the UK Prime Minister Tony Blair sent<br />
a letter to the Italian Prime Minister<br />
Silvio Berlusconi complaining about<br />
the delays in the development of the<br />
project. The Berlusconi government<br />
then forced Enel, the Italian power<br />
utility, to enter into the project, in a<br />
bid to speed up the process. However,<br />
that did not happen, and later in 2005,<br />
Enel, having understood the difficulties<br />
facing the LNG terminal, decided<br />
to drop out. Despite all the legislative<br />
and bureaucratic hurdles, the British<br />
company succeeded in obtaining<br />
the relevant authorisations from local<br />
authorities, but new elections in<br />
2006 brought a new administration<br />
that rejected and appealed against<br />
it. Then, an investigation into bribes<br />
paid to obtain the first authorisation<br />
was launched, bringing further<br />
problems. The drop in domestic gas<br />
consumption, linked to the 2008 economic<br />
crisis, made the project much<br />
less attractive. Finally, in March 2012,<br />
after eleven years and an investment<br />
51<br />
CASPIAN REPORT, SPRING <strong>2014</strong>