Caspian Report - Issue: 07 - Spring 2014
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Afghanistan’s National<br />
Challenges<br />
The stalemate over the signing of<br />
BSA only exacerbates the existing national<br />
and global challenges. It introduces<br />
more uncertainty to an already<br />
fragile situation. As they say, Americans<br />
have the watch but Afghans<br />
have the time, especially the Taliban.<br />
Afghan politics is based on betting<br />
on who will win, and siding with that<br />
party. If people calculate that power<br />
will be redistributed, they make new<br />
alliances based on those predictions.<br />
All of the actors - ethnic groups, tribal<br />
leaders, warlords, local police, and<br />
power brokers - are interested in<br />
maximizing their gains and can (re)<br />
make any alliance. In this complex<br />
power matrix, there are three interrelated<br />
questions: security, politics,<br />
and the economy. The security question<br />
requires an evaluation of the<br />
ability of the Afghan Security Forces’<br />
(ASF) to counter the Taliban insurgents.<br />
Even if the ASF is stronger,<br />
the legitimacy of a new government<br />
in Kabul depends on the success of<br />
the presidential elections this year<br />
for which people should feel secure<br />
enough to go to polls. Moreover, if the<br />
US troops leave and foreign aid weakens<br />
the economy to support ASF or<br />
state services fail. If Afghanistan falls<br />
into a civil conflict, the war economy<br />
will take hold of peoples’ lives. In this<br />
economic structure, war means employment,<br />
and peace means unemployment.<br />
Thus, evaluating the security,<br />
politics, and economy prospects<br />
for Afghanistan is a matter of life and<br />
death for the betters.<br />
Security<br />
Afghan politics is based on betting<br />
on who will win, and siding<br />
with that party.<br />
Over the last twelve years, the war in<br />
Afghanistan has cost 2,310 American<br />
lives 15 and $700 billion. 16 In his memoir,<br />
former US Defense Secretary<br />
Robert Gates described how the US’s<br />
Afghanistan policy changed from<br />
perceiving a fight that had to be won,<br />
to a situation that America just had<br />
to exit. The exit strategy has been to<br />
build the capacity of the ANF and to<br />
train them to defend their own country<br />
- but is ANF ready to take over<br />
There are some very optimistic views<br />
on the capacity of the ANF and on the<br />
country’s stability, but also deep pessimism,<br />
that once the US leaves, everything<br />
will fall apart. 17 According<br />
to the unclassified assessment by the<br />
US military, violence in Afghanistan<br />
has diminished, and “Afghan security<br />
forces are now successfully providing<br />
security for their own people.” 18<br />
11<br />
CASPIAN REPORT, sprIng <strong>2014</strong><br />
15.<br />
Iraq Coalition Casualty Count. http://icasualties.org/oef/. Retrieved on Feb. 23, <strong>2014</strong>.<br />
16.<br />
National Priorities Project. http://nationalpriorities.org/cost-of/. Retrieved on Feb. 22, <strong>2014</strong>.<br />
17.<br />
Ernesto Londoño, Karen DeYoung and Greg Miller (2013) Afghanistan gains will be lost quickly<br />
after drawdown, U.S. intelligence estimate warns” Dec. 28. http://www.washingtonpost.<br />
com/world/national-security/afghanistan-gains-will-be-lost-quickly-after-drawdown-usintelligence-estimate-warns/2013/12/28/ac609f90-6f32-11e3-aecc-85cb037b7236_story.<br />
html. Retrived on Feb. 20, <strong>2014</strong>.<br />
18.<br />
US Department of Defense (2013) <strong>Report</strong> on Progress Toward Security and Stability in<br />
Afghanistan. http://www.defense.gov/pubs/October_1230_<strong>Report</strong>_Master_Nov7.pdf. P. 1.<br />
Retrieved on Feb. 19, <strong>2014</strong>.