30.12.2014 Views

Land Rights and the Forest Peoples of Africa

Land Rights and the Forest Peoples of Africa

Land Rights and the Forest Peoples of Africa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>L<strong>and</strong></strong> rights <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> forest peoples <strong>of</strong> <strong>Africa</strong> – Part II<br />

peoples to compensation in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> damages resulting from exploration <strong>and</strong><br />

exploitation programmes pertaining to <strong>the</strong>ir l<strong>and</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> in case <strong>of</strong> relocation <strong>of</strong><br />

indigenous peoples. The draft declaration on <strong>the</strong> rights <strong>of</strong> indigenous peoples [Article 27]<br />

recognizes <strong>the</strong> right to <strong>the</strong> restitution or, where this is not possible, to just <strong>and</strong> fair<br />

compensation for l<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> territories which have been confiscated, occupied, used or<br />

damaged without <strong>the</strong>ir free <strong>and</strong> informed consent. Compensation shall preferably take<br />

<strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> territories <strong>of</strong> quality, quantity <strong>and</strong> legal status at least equal to<br />

those territories which were lost. 83<br />

Article 28 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> UN draft Declaration on <strong>the</strong> <strong>Rights</strong> <strong>of</strong> Indigenous <strong>Peoples</strong> states that:<br />

1. Indigenous peoples have <strong>the</strong> right to redress, by means that can include restitution<br />

or, when this is not possible, just, fair <strong>and</strong> equitable compensation, for <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong>s,<br />

territories <strong>and</strong> resources which <strong>the</strong>y have traditionally owned or o<strong>the</strong>rwise occupied or<br />

used, <strong>and</strong> which have been confiscated, taken, occupied, used or damaged without <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

free, prior <strong>and</strong> informed consent.<br />

2. Unless o<strong>the</strong>rwise freely agreed upon by <strong>the</strong> peoples concerned, compensation shall<br />

take <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong>s, territories <strong>and</strong> resources equal in quality, size <strong>and</strong> legal status or<br />

<strong>of</strong> monetary compensation or o<strong>the</strong>r appropriate redress.<br />

In 1997, <strong>the</strong> UN Committee on <strong>the</strong> Elimination <strong>of</strong> Racial Discrimination also addressed this<br />

issue in its General Recommendation XXIII called upon States parties:<br />

to recognize <strong>and</strong> protect <strong>the</strong> rights <strong>of</strong> indigenous peoples to own, develop, control <strong>and</strong><br />

use <strong>the</strong>ir communal l<strong>and</strong>s, territories <strong>and</strong> resources <strong>and</strong>, where <strong>the</strong>y have been deprived<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir l<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> territories traditionally owned or o<strong>the</strong>rwise inhabited or used without<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir free <strong>and</strong> informed consent, to take steps to return those l<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> territories. Only<br />

when this is for factual reasons not possible, <strong>the</strong> right to restitution should be substituted<br />

by <strong>the</strong> right to just, fair <strong>and</strong> prompt compensation. Such compensation should as far as<br />

possible take <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> l<strong>and</strong>s <strong>and</strong> territories. 84<br />

Finally, Convention 169 <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> International Labour Organization requires that indigenous<br />

peoples’ collective rights <strong>of</strong> ownership <strong>and</strong> possession over <strong>the</strong> l<strong>and</strong>s which <strong>the</strong>y traditionally<br />

occupy shall be recognised. 85 The term ‘traditionally occupy’ does not require a continued <strong>and</strong><br />

present occupation, but ra<strong>the</strong>r, according to <strong>the</strong> International Labour Organization, ‘<strong>the</strong>re<br />

should be some connection to <strong>the</strong> present’. 86 Consequently, under ILO 169 – <strong>and</strong> ILO 107,<br />

which uses <strong>the</strong> same language – indigenous peoples have <strong>the</strong> right to restitution <strong>and</strong><br />

recognition <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir rights to l<strong>and</strong>s ‘traditionally occupied’ that <strong>the</strong>y have been expelled from<br />

or that <strong>the</strong>y have lost title to or possession <strong>of</strong> in <strong>the</strong> recent past, including those incorporated<br />

83<br />

Ibid., p 9.<br />

84<br />

UN Committee on <strong>the</strong> Elimination <strong>of</strong> Racial Discrimination, General Recommendation XXIII (51)<br />

concerning Indigenous <strong>Peoples</strong>, adopted at <strong>the</strong> 1235th meeting, 18 August 1997, UN Doc. CERD/C/51/Misc.<br />

13/Rev. 4, paragraph 5.<br />

85<br />

ILO 169, Article 14.<br />

86<br />

International Labour Office (2000), ILO Convention on Indigenous <strong>and</strong> Tribal <strong>Peoples</strong> 1989 (No. 169): A<br />

Manual, Project to Promote ILO Policy on Indigenous <strong>and</strong> Tribal <strong>Peoples</strong>, Geneva, p 18.<br />

Couillard & Gilbert 45<br />

March 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!