Land Rights and the Forest Peoples of Africa

Land rights and the forest peoples of Africa – Part I
themes that have helped to foster these conditions and that have caused such conflict between
those holding such different ways of perceiving the forests of Central Africa.
A
Nature–culture divide
And God said unto them,
Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth,
And subdue it: and have dominion
Over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air,
And over every living thing that moveth upon the earth 10
In the West, historically through dominant aspects of Judaeo-Christian and Greek traditions,
and further developed through the Enlightenment and Darwinism, Western thought has
evolved an ideology which dictates that humans and nature are (or have become) mutually
exclusive categories, humans being civilised and nature being wild. 11 As a result ‘nature’ was
‘to be mastered, tamed, brought under “man’s” control, bent to his will, forced to reveal her
secrets, compelled to satisfy his needs and minister to his happiness’. 12 It was within this
paradigm that 18th-century writers such as Adam Smith theorised the development of
mankind out of nature and into modernity. For Smith, human economic activity evolved
through a series of four stages, commencing with hunting and gathering, which he described
as ‘the lowest and rudest state of society’. 13 Economic activity was seen to progress through
pastoralism and settled agriculture, culminating in manufacturing and commerce. 14 Prior to
this, John Locke had famously recounted his theories of property in Two Treatises of
Government. 15 It is here that Locke justifies the private ownership of land and goods through
the application of labour:
Though the earth and all inferior creatures be common to all men, yet every man has a
‘property’ in his own ‘person.’ This nobody has any right to but himself. The ‘labour’ of
his body and the ‘work’ of his hands, we may say, are properly his. Whatsoever, then, he
removes out of the state that Nature hath provided and left it in, he hath mixed his labour
with it, and joined to it something that is his own, and thereby makes it his property. It
being by him removed from the common state Nature placed it in, it hath by this labour
something annexed to it that excludes the common right of other men. For this ‘labour’
being the unquestionable property of the labourer, no man but he can have a right to
10 Genesis 1: 28.
11 M Colchester (2003) Salvaging Nature: Indigenous Peoples, Protected Areas and Biodiversity
Conservation, World Rainforest Movement and Forest Peoples Programme; K. Thomas (1983) Man and the
natural world: changing attitudes in England 1500-1800, London, Allen Lane, pp 17–50.
12 V Argyrou (2005) The logic of environmentalism: Anthropology, Ecology and Postcoloniality, Berghahn
Books, Oxford and New York, p vii.
13 A Smith (1776) An Inquiry into the Nature And Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Book V, Chapter 1, Part 1.
http://www.adamsmith.org/smith/won/won-index.html (accessed 14 January 2007).
14 Ibid.; see also M Cowen and R Shenton (1995) ‘The invention of development’, in J S Crush (ed.) Power of
development, Routledge, London; A Barnard (2004) ‘Hunting-and-Gathering Society: an Eighteenth-
Century Scottish Invention’, in A Barnard (ed.) Hunter–gatherers in history, archaeology and
anthropology, Berg, Oxford.
15 J Locke (1823) The works of John Locke, Thomas Tegg, London.
Kidd & Kenrick 8
March 2009