30.12.2014 Views

Biophysical studies of membrane proteins/peptides. Interaction with ...

Biophysical studies of membrane proteins/peptides. Interaction with ...

Biophysical studies of membrane proteins/peptides. Interaction with ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INTRODUCTION: LIPID-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS<br />

group interacts differently <strong>with</strong> charged <strong>membrane</strong> <strong>proteins</strong>, and <strong>proteins</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten present<br />

smaller affinities for PG than for PS and PA (Mall et al., 2002).<br />

The complexity to the protein-charged lipid interaction problem is raised by the<br />

position <strong>of</strong> amino acid residues in the protein surface. Basic helices <strong>with</strong> different<br />

hydrophobic thickness were shown to present different selectivities to negatively<br />

charged lipids. This was rationalized as the result <strong>of</strong> tilting <strong>of</strong> helices in the <strong>membrane</strong>,<br />

that located basic residues away from the headgroup region where strong interactions<br />

between <strong>proteins</strong> and lipid headgroups are more likely (Mall et al., 2002). Additionally,<br />

experiments <strong>with</strong> model <strong>peptides</strong> showed that insertion <strong>of</strong> Tyr decreased binding<br />

affinities to anionic phospholipids, suggesting that the presence <strong>of</strong> Tyr residues<br />

prevented close association <strong>of</strong> anionic phospholipids and cationic residues (Mall et al.,<br />

2000).<br />

These results suggest that the effects <strong>of</strong> charge on the interactions between lipids<br />

and <strong>membrane</strong> <strong>proteins</strong>, though important are not determinant, and will be strongly<br />

dependent on the detailed structure <strong>of</strong> the peptide and its orientation in the <strong>membrane</strong><br />

(Mall et al., 2002). Binding affinities <strong>of</strong> <strong>proteins</strong> for lipids are generally presented<br />

relative to the binding affinity <strong>of</strong> PC lipids. PC and PE lipids frequently present the<br />

lowest affinities for <strong>membrane</strong> <strong>proteins</strong>.<br />

Binding sites for hydrophobic molecules have been shown to exist for several<br />

<strong>proteins</strong> distinct from the sites for interaction <strong>with</strong> annular lipids. These are called nonannular<br />

sites. They are generally located between TM α-helices or at protein-protein<br />

interfaces. For some cases, these sites are available for interaction <strong>with</strong> some lipids but<br />

not for others (Lee, 2003). Some lipid molecules were shown in crystal structures <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>proteins</strong> to be bound to such sites. These observations suggest that the binding affinities<br />

for these sites are much higher than the ones observed for annular lipids (Lee et al.,<br />

2003).<br />

Notably, several protein domains bind specifically to one or more forms <strong>of</strong><br />

phosphorylated PIP molecules through interactions that are very specific. Such domains<br />

are <strong>of</strong>ten found on <strong>proteins</strong> involved in signal transduction. Other <strong>proteins</strong> bind<br />

specifically to some components <strong>of</strong> raft domains, establishing a mechanism for<br />

targeting the protein to specific structures in the <strong>membrane</strong> (Epand, 2005; Pérez-Gil et<br />

al., 2005).<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!