Biophysical studies of membrane proteins/peptides. Interaction with ...
Biophysical studies of membrane proteins/peptides. Interaction with ...
Biophysical studies of membrane proteins/peptides. Interaction with ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
INTRODUCTION: LIPID-PROTEIN INTERACTIONS<br />
group interacts differently <strong>with</strong> charged <strong>membrane</strong> <strong>proteins</strong>, and <strong>proteins</strong> <strong>of</strong>ten present<br />
smaller affinities for PG than for PS and PA (Mall et al., 2002).<br />
The complexity to the protein-charged lipid interaction problem is raised by the<br />
position <strong>of</strong> amino acid residues in the protein surface. Basic helices <strong>with</strong> different<br />
hydrophobic thickness were shown to present different selectivities to negatively<br />
charged lipids. This was rationalized as the result <strong>of</strong> tilting <strong>of</strong> helices in the <strong>membrane</strong>,<br />
that located basic residues away from the headgroup region where strong interactions<br />
between <strong>proteins</strong> and lipid headgroups are more likely (Mall et al., 2002). Additionally,<br />
experiments <strong>with</strong> model <strong>peptides</strong> showed that insertion <strong>of</strong> Tyr decreased binding<br />
affinities to anionic phospholipids, suggesting that the presence <strong>of</strong> Tyr residues<br />
prevented close association <strong>of</strong> anionic phospholipids and cationic residues (Mall et al.,<br />
2000).<br />
These results suggest that the effects <strong>of</strong> charge on the interactions between lipids<br />
and <strong>membrane</strong> <strong>proteins</strong>, though important are not determinant, and will be strongly<br />
dependent on the detailed structure <strong>of</strong> the peptide and its orientation in the <strong>membrane</strong><br />
(Mall et al., 2002). Binding affinities <strong>of</strong> <strong>proteins</strong> for lipids are generally presented<br />
relative to the binding affinity <strong>of</strong> PC lipids. PC and PE lipids frequently present the<br />
lowest affinities for <strong>membrane</strong> <strong>proteins</strong>.<br />
Binding sites for hydrophobic molecules have been shown to exist for several<br />
<strong>proteins</strong> distinct from the sites for interaction <strong>with</strong> annular lipids. These are called nonannular<br />
sites. They are generally located between TM α-helices or at protein-protein<br />
interfaces. For some cases, these sites are available for interaction <strong>with</strong> some lipids but<br />
not for others (Lee, 2003). Some lipid molecules were shown in crystal structures <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>proteins</strong> to be bound to such sites. These observations suggest that the binding affinities<br />
for these sites are much higher than the ones observed for annular lipids (Lee et al.,<br />
2003).<br />
Notably, several protein domains bind specifically to one or more forms <strong>of</strong><br />
phosphorylated PIP molecules through interactions that are very specific. Such domains<br />
are <strong>of</strong>ten found on <strong>proteins</strong> involved in signal transduction. Other <strong>proteins</strong> bind<br />
specifically to some components <strong>of</strong> raft domains, establishing a mechanism for<br />
targeting the protein to specific structures in the <strong>membrane</strong> (Epand, 2005; Pérez-Gil et<br />
al., 2005).<br />
41