30.12.2014 Views

Biophysical studies of membrane proteins/peptides. Interaction with ...

Biophysical studies of membrane proteins/peptides. Interaction with ...

Biophysical studies of membrane proteins/peptides. Interaction with ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter III ‐ Binding <strong>of</strong> Inhibitors to a Putative Binding<br />

Domain <strong>of</strong> V‐ATPase.<br />

The <strong>studies</strong> conducted allowed us to know in detail the properties <strong>of</strong> the indole type<br />

<strong>of</strong> inhibitors in lipid <strong>membrane</strong>s. The molecules studied, which correspond to the initial<br />

(low efficiency) and final stage (high efficiency) in the development <strong>of</strong> these inhibitors<br />

as potential drugs in osteoporosis treatment, present almost identical properties in the<br />

liposomes environment. The preference <strong>of</strong> the lipid phase over the aqueous phase, the<br />

position in the bilayer and the orientation <strong>of</strong> the molecules were all almost identical for<br />

both molecules studied.<br />

According to the results <strong>of</strong> Gagliardi et al. (1998a), the change in inhibition<br />

efficiency <strong>of</strong> the V-ATPase inhibitors <strong>with</strong>in the indole class presented some extent <strong>of</strong><br />

correlation to the hydrophobicity <strong>of</strong> the molecules, i.e. the more hydrophobic indole<br />

inhibitor molecules had also a tendency to be more efficient inhibitors <strong>of</strong> V-ATPase. It<br />

was possible that the interaction <strong>of</strong> the molecules <strong>with</strong> the lipid milieu was significantly<br />

different <strong>with</strong>in this class <strong>of</strong> inhibitors, and this could correspond to dramatically<br />

different efficiencies <strong>of</strong> inhibition, explaining the 10 3 difference in IC 50 values <strong>of</strong> INH-1<br />

and SB242784. In this way, the process <strong>of</strong> inhibitor binding to the lipid bilayer would<br />

be crucial to the efficiency <strong>of</strong> the inhibition event. However, the results obtained point<br />

to a non-determinant role <strong>of</strong> inhibitor interaction <strong>with</strong> the lipid bilayer, and the specific<br />

molecular recognition processes <strong>with</strong> the enzyme’s inhibition site are very likely to be<br />

responsible for dictating the large differences <strong>of</strong> inhibition efficiencies <strong>with</strong>in the V-<br />

ATPase indole inhibitors class.<br />

The binding <strong>studies</strong> <strong>of</strong> bafilomycin and SB242784 to the peptide corresponding to<br />

the 4 th TM helix <strong>of</strong> subunit c <strong>of</strong> V-ATPase revealed no affinity at all for SB242784 and<br />

very low affinities for bafilomycin. These results can be seen as an indicator that the<br />

binding pocket for the inhibitors is not solely composed <strong>of</strong> the lipid exposed face <strong>of</strong> the<br />

4 th TM helix <strong>of</strong> subunit c, but also involves contributions <strong>of</strong> amino acids from other<br />

domains <strong>of</strong> the protein. This proposal is in agreement <strong>with</strong> the hypothesis <strong>of</strong> the<br />

inhibitors operating as a stone in a gear, blocking movements <strong>of</strong> the TM domains <strong>of</strong><br />

subunit c and interrupting proton transport.<br />

184

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!