GEOTOUR & IRSE 2012.pdf - Fakulta BERG - TUKE
GEOTOUR & IRSE 2012.pdf - Fakulta BERG - TUKE GEOTOUR & IRSE 2012.pdf - Fakulta BERG - TUKE
Salgótarján, 04. – 06. October 2012 - The economical situation of the population (ESP) - Workplace-creating investments (WCI) - Enterprises (E) Of course, one of the most important index-group contains the characteristics of the economical situation. The different size of the settlements has an effect on the data, so it is important to create dimensions and the unified metric. In the construction of composite indicators the normalisation is very important. Indicators should be normalised to render them comparable. Attention need to be paid to extreme values as they may influence subsequent steps in the process of building a composite indicator. Skewed data should also be identified and accounted for (OECD Handbook, 2008.). Different normalisation methods will produce different results for the composite indicator (Ranking; Standardisation; Min-Max; Indicators above or below the mean etc.). The authors demonstrate the theoretical background of the “ Indicators above or below the mean” normalisation type. This transformation considers the indicators which are above and below an arbitrarily defined threshold, p, around the mean: 1 if w>(1+p) { I t qc= 0 if (1-p) w (1+p) where w = -1 if w < (1-p) x x t qc t 0 qc c The threshold p builds a neutral region around the mean, where the transformed indicator is zero. This reduces the sharp discontinuity, from -1 to +1, which exists across the mean value to two minor discontinuities, from -1 to 0 and from 0 to +1, across the thresholds. A larger number of thresholds could be created at different distances from the mean value, which might overlap with the categorical scales. An indicator that moved from significantly below the mean to significantly above the threshold in the consecutive year would have a positive effect on the composite (OECD Handbook, 2008.). SUMMARY The composite indicator should ideally measure multidimensional concepts which cannot be captured by a single indicator, e.g. competitiveness, industrialisation, sustainability, single market integration, knowledge-based society, etc (OECD Handbook, 2008.). The factor of the economical and social underprivileged areas (ESUA) was created by summarizing different indexes ordered into five main groups (Siskáné Szilasi, B. 2010). ESUA = Σ (NF + SF + BEF + CF + EF), where the NF is the natural factor, the SF is the social factor, the BEF is the built environmental factor, the CF is the cultural factor, the EF is the economical factor. In the future we plan to make an empirical study and we will continue the analyses of statistical data. (Imputation of missing data, Multivariate analysis, Normalisation, Weighting and aggregation, Robustness and sensitivity, Presentation and visualisation). According to our results the examined sample area has good possibilities to develop geotourism. 86
GEOTOUR & IRSE 2012 Acknowledgement „The described work was carried out as part of the TÁMOP-4.2.2/B-10/1-2010-0008 project in the framework of the New Hungarian Development Plan. The realization of this project is supported by the European Union, co-financed by the European Social Fund.” REFERENCES [1] B. SZILASI SISKÁNÉ 2010: A bányászati tevékenység megszűnésével hátrányos gazdasági helyzetbe került területek turisztikai hasznosításának lehetőségei magyarországi mintaterületeken. Manusscript, Miskolc, 10 p. [2] S. WILLIAMS 2009: Tourism geography. A new synthesis. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, London and New York, pp.: 157-180 [3] OECD 2008: Handbook on Constructiong Composite Indicators. European Commission. www. oecd.org, 158 p. [4] LESS GY.-Grill J.-Róth L.-Szentpétery I.-Gyuricza Gy 1988: Geological map of the Aggtelek-Rudabánya Mts. 1:25000. Hung. Geol. Inst. Budapest [5] DOBOS E. 2001: A regionális elemzések módszertani kérdései. Elméleti megfontolások. ECOSTAT A gazdaságelemzés Módszerei 2001/II. szám, Budapest, 53 p. [6] RAPPAI G.- SZERB L. 2011: Összetett indexek készítése új módon: A szűk keresztmetszetekért történő büntetés módszere. Műhelytanulmányok 2011/1. Pécs. 19 p. [7] A. SOLARSKA –Z. JARY 2010: Geoheritage and Geotourism Potential of the Strzelin Hills (Sudetic Foreland, SW Poland). Geographica Pannonica. Volume 14, Issue 4. pp.: 118-125 Internet sources: http://anp.nemzetipark.gov.hu/geology-and-caves http://www.rudabanya.hu/en/index.html http://anp.nemzetipark.gov.hu/geology-and-caves http://www.rudabanya.hu http://www.ksh.hu 87
- Page 38 and 39: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 40 and 41: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 42 and 43: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 44 and 45: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 46 and 47: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 48 and 49: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 50 and 51: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 52 and 53: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 54 and 55: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 56 and 57: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 58 and 59: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 60 and 61: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 62 and 63: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 64 and 65: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 66 and 67: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 68 and 69: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 70 and 71: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 72 and 73: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 74 and 75: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 76 and 77: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 78 and 79: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 80 and 81: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 82 and 83: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 84 and 85: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 86 and 87: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 90 and 91: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 92 and 93: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 THE S
- Page 94 and 95: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 Fig.
- Page 96 and 97: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 http:
- Page 98 and 99: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 Fig.
- Page 100 and 101: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 Effec
- Page 102 and 103: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 SUMMA
- Page 104 and 105: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 of 10
- Page 106 and 107: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 the s
- Page 108 and 109: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 in Lo
- Page 110 and 111: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 Fig.
- Page 112 and 113: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 of th
- Page 114 and 115: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 [5] F
- Page 116 and 117: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 The C
- Page 118 and 119: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 the m
- Page 120 and 121: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 some
- Page 122 and 123: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 MININ
- Page 124 and 125: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 impor
- Page 126 and 127: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 Fig.
- Page 128 and 129: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 Fig.
- Page 130 and 131: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 of th
- Page 132 and 133: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 MAPPI
- Page 134 and 135: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 admin
- Page 136: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 unlim
<strong>GEOTOUR</strong> & <strong>IRSE</strong> 2012<br />
Acknowledgement<br />
„The described work was carried out as part of the TÁMOP-4.2.2/B-10/1-2010-0008 project<br />
in the framework of the New Hungarian Development Plan. The realization of this project is<br />
supported by the European Union, co-financed by the European Social Fund.”<br />
REFERENCES<br />
[1] B. SZILASI SISKÁNÉ 2010: A bányászati tevékenység megszűnésével hátrányos<br />
gazdasági helyzetbe került területek turisztikai hasznosításának lehetőségei<br />
magyarországi mintaterületeken. Manusscript, Miskolc, 10 p.<br />
[2] S. WILLIAMS 2009: Tourism geography. A new synthesis. Routledge Taylor and<br />
Francis Group, London and New York, pp.: 157-180<br />
[3] OECD 2008: Handbook on Constructiong Composite Indicators. European Commission.<br />
www. oecd.org, 158 p.<br />
[4] LESS GY.-Grill J.-Róth L.-Szentpétery I.-Gyuricza Gy 1988: Geological map of the<br />
Aggtelek-Rudabánya Mts. 1:25000. Hung. Geol. Inst. Budapest<br />
[5] DOBOS E. 2001: A regionális elemzések módszertani kérdései. Elméleti megfontolások.<br />
ECOSTAT A gazdaságelemzés Módszerei 2001/II. szám, Budapest, 53 p.<br />
[6] RAPPAI G.- SZERB L. 2011: Összetett indexek készítése új módon: A szűk<br />
keresztmetszetekért történő büntetés módszere. Műhelytanulmányok 2011/1. Pécs. 19 p.<br />
[7] A. SOLARSKA –Z. JARY 2010: Geoheritage and Geotourism Potential of the Strzelin<br />
Hills (Sudetic Foreland, SW Poland). Geographica Pannonica. Volume 14, Issue 4. pp.:<br />
118-125<br />
Internet sources:<br />
http://anp.nemzetipark.gov.hu/geology-and-caves<br />
http://www.rudabanya.hu/en/index.html<br />
http://anp.nemzetipark.gov.hu/geology-and-caves<br />
http://www.rudabanya.hu<br />
http://www.ksh.hu<br />
87