GEOTOUR & IRSE 2012.pdf - Fakulta BERG - TUKE
GEOTOUR & IRSE 2012.pdf - Fakulta BERG - TUKE
GEOTOUR & IRSE 2012.pdf - Fakulta BERG - TUKE
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Salgótarján, 04. – 06. October 2012<br />
1200<br />
1000<br />
800<br />
600<br />
400<br />
200<br />
0<br />
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011<br />
15-24 25-34 35-49 50 and more<br />
Fig. 5 Number of jobseekers by age group<br />
Source: Regdat SR, 2012<br />
In term of business subjects and law forms, the largest representation has tradesmen in the<br />
services area, but also business companies, mostly limited liability companies. (PHSR<br />
Sobrance - Profil územia, 2006)<br />
The number of industrial plants in Sobrance district is decreasing during last years according<br />
available information. In 2010, regional database Regdat stated only 2 industrial plants in<br />
Sobrance district – in contrast to Michalovce district, were have been stated 32 industrial<br />
plants. This fact indicates the hard situation in the employment opportunities in Sobrance<br />
district. Many people leave this region and move for seeking job in other towns, or they move<br />
abroad. Sobrance district is according these indicators on the low level of development, it<br />
lacks mainly business activities, that could create capital and new job for local inhabitants.<br />
Table 1 shows the number of employees in the particular economic activities in Sobrance<br />
district in 2009. According data from regional database Regdat, the most employees work in<br />
the public administration, in the business and education, and in the agriculture. Figure 6 also<br />
notes, that industry, or construction is on the next levels. This situation is related with absence<br />
of the industrial plants and other business activities in the Sobrance district.<br />
ANALYSIS OF SOBRANCE DISTRICT<br />
To analyse Sobrance district, we used results of SWOT analysis, to show what are strengths,<br />
weaknesses, opportunities and threats.<br />
Strengths of the district emphasize mostly suitable geographical position, potential for<br />
investment projects in industry, tourism or at present supported renewable energy<br />
resources. Good transport position and close border with Ukraine is advantage of this district<br />
and could empower cooperation with Lviv region (Transcarpathian region).<br />
Weaknesses of the district are mainly: lack of business development and tourism<br />
development conception and weak promotion of the region. Very important is also<br />
passivity of local inhabitants and there is no detailed analysis of the region and mapping<br />
the current conditions of renewable energy resources for the business development.<br />
Interregional networking and coordination and cooperation in business is also weak and in the<br />
56