GEOTOUR & IRSE 2012.pdf - Fakulta BERG - TUKE

GEOTOUR & IRSE 2012.pdf - Fakulta BERG - TUKE GEOTOUR & IRSE 2012.pdf - Fakulta BERG - TUKE

fberg.tuke.sk
from fberg.tuke.sk More from this publisher
30.12.2014 Views

Salgótarján, 04. – 06. October 2012 Demjén every settlement had commercial accommodation establishments. Values have been marked in gray that exceeded the regional average. Eger and Miskolc are big cities with a complex supply of tourist attractions their performance are effected by several factors beyond thermal tourism. In the case of other settlements bath reconstructions or newly developed resorts meant significant growth especially when development of accommodation occurred in the same area. Competition is strengthening resorts without significant investments have found themselves on the periphery (Bükkszék, Gyöngyös, Szerencs, Tarnaméra, Mezőcsát, Pásztó). POSSIBLE SOURCES OF DEVELOPMENT In the last two decades significant developments took place in the region. New or totally modernized (Tiszaújváros, Eger, Egerszalók, Miskolc, Sárospatak Demjén) or partially renovated baths (Bogács, Mezőkövesd) can be found in the region but several old fashioned resorts have definitely less visitors than 20-30 years ago. It can be a good question where the further sources of investments can come from. I think this question can be answered better on (micro)-regional level. A settlement is often has so few tourist attractions that a combination of a bigger area can attract tourists more effectively for a bit longer stay. In my earlier research „The processes of regional tourism context, in particular the North- Hungarian region‟ with the help of principal component analysis I was able to group the indicators that are associated with the development of the number of guest nights. Four factors were crated: 1. economic activity factor 2. tourism supply factor 3. regional attractiveness factor 4. regional social situation factor The “tourism supply” and “economic activity” factors appeared significantly in the model based on the results of the principal component analysis. The model can explain the specific values of the micro-regional guest night numbers at 68.3%. It is not appropriate to judge the micro-regions‟ position exclusively on the basis of that categorization, since the values of the categories range between considerably wide boundaries; therefore, I classified the microregions using cluster analysis. The Eger micro-region is a distinct „group‟ on the basis of the eigenvalues of the “economic activity” and “tourism supply” factors, where the “economic activity” and “tourism supply” are above average. The micro-region‟s level of “economic activity” is more favorable than its (at regional level) already outstanding “tourism supply”. The capital necessary to develop tourism supply may come from internal sources as well. There are investors from outside due to its fame, visitor turnover and growth potential, and further investment is expected. It is necessary to improve the efficiency of the sector, to enhance the region‟s (foreign) recognition and to establish new (artificial) tourism attractions in order to keep up the pace of growth. The Tokaj micro-region is a similar „group‟ with its, outstanding tourism supply (for the region), that far outweighs its economic potential. The resources of tourism development come from the region only to a lesser extent. There are a significant number of domestic and foreign investors, primarily in the area of wine production and accommodation, due to its growth potential as well as the domestic and international awareness of the name “Tokaj”. There is a chance to gain resources for the establishment of new/artificial attractions from state sources in order to enhance to a greater extent the micro-region‟s visitor turnover. Due to the nature of the tendering systems, primarily local governmental initiatives will bring quality change in the region. 50

GEOTOUR & IRSE 2012 Fig. 4 Northern Hungary‟s micro-regions on the basis of the eigenvalues of the „Economic activity” and „Tourism supply” factors, Source: Own calculations based on HCSO data Miskolc and Tiszaújváros micro-regions‟ tourism supply significantly falls short of their economic performance. The capital necessary for tourism development may come only partly from internal resources. Developments implemented several years ago have had their effects on the Tiszaújváros micro-region. The level of development of the tourism sector, however, does not justify the appearance of a large number of investors from outside. I view the greatest opportunities in the area of developing services and attractions related to the Tisza River in order to maintain growth, since this kind of „through traffic‟ is less likely to interfere with the industrial nature of the region. The development necessary for further growth is expected from the local government of Tiszaújváros. The Sátoraljaújhely micro-region is alone in its group with around-average “economic activity” and above-average “tourism supply”. The development of tourism supply seems to have come to a halt in the past 4-5 years; therefore, it is likely that the number of guests cannot be significantly increased without the continuous involvement of resources (primarily from grant funding). Only developments of minor volume, necessary for tourism development, may come from regional resources. The Gyöngyös and Sárospatak micro-regions have about-average economic opportunities and about-average “tourism supply”. The Sárospatak micro-region is in the period of dynamic growth, the Gyöngyös micro-region is in a period of slight decline. Only minor investments are expected from internal resources; they can expect central regional development sources for maintaining and launching growth. The Salgótarján, Balassagyarmat, Kazincbarcika and Hatvani micro-regions‟ about-average “economic activity” is coupled with below-average “tourism supply”. Their low-level tourism performance is stagnating, or shows the signs of decline. Investments necessary for tourism 51

<strong>GEOTOUR</strong> & <strong>IRSE</strong> 2012<br />

Fig. 4 Northern Hungary‟s micro-regions on the basis of the eigenvalues of the „Economic activity” and<br />

„Tourism supply” factors, Source: Own calculations based on HCSO data<br />

Miskolc and Tiszaújváros micro-regions‟ tourism supply significantly falls short of their<br />

economic performance. The capital necessary for tourism development may come only partly<br />

from internal resources. Developments implemented several years ago have had their effects<br />

on the Tiszaújváros micro-region. The level of development of the tourism sector, however,<br />

does not justify the appearance of a large number of investors from outside. I view the<br />

greatest opportunities in the area of developing services and attractions related to the Tisza<br />

River in order to maintain growth, since this kind of „through traffic‟ is less likely to interfere<br />

with the industrial nature of the region. The development necessary for further growth is<br />

expected from the local government of Tiszaújváros.<br />

The Sátoraljaújhely micro-region is alone in its group with around-average “economic<br />

activity” and above-average “tourism supply”. The development of tourism supply seems to<br />

have come to a halt in the past 4-5 years; therefore, it is likely that the number of guests<br />

cannot be significantly increased without the continuous involvement of resources (primarily<br />

from grant funding). Only developments of minor volume, necessary for tourism<br />

development, may come from regional resources.<br />

The Gyöngyös and Sárospatak micro-regions have about-average economic opportunities and<br />

about-average “tourism supply”. The Sárospatak micro-region is in the period of dynamic<br />

growth, the Gyöngyös micro-region is in a period of slight decline. Only minor investments<br />

are expected from internal resources; they can expect central regional development sources<br />

for maintaining and launching growth.<br />

The Salgótarján, Balassagyarmat, Kazincbarcika and Hatvani micro-regions‟ about-average<br />

“economic activity” is coupled with below-average “tourism supply”. Their low-level tourism<br />

performance is stagnating, or shows the signs of decline. Investments necessary for tourism<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!