GEOTOUR & IRSE 2012.pdf - Fakulta BERG - TUKE
GEOTOUR & IRSE 2012.pdf - Fakulta BERG - TUKE GEOTOUR & IRSE 2012.pdf - Fakulta BERG - TUKE
Salgótarján, 04. – 06. October 2012 Tab. 2 SWOT analysis of Hungary‟s thermal tourism Strengths: Richness of mineral, thermal and medicinal water resources, historical baths, spas, spa culture, internationally-known sites, brands, world-class spas, reasonable prices, stable domestic demand, well-functioning quality monitoring, operational thematic clusters. Opportunities: Increasing proportion of elderly people, increasing demand for alternative tourism, the increase in effective demand in the case of the neighboring countries, increasing demand for specialized services, opening of European insurance companies, strengthening Internet-based communication, growing selection of quality hotels, foreign investments, rapid expansion of highway network, higher level management skills, strengthening the travel agencies, increasing demand for wellness services. Source: Own compilation Weaknesses: Many baths are in bad condition, variable quality of services, lack of self-government resources, lack of cooperation among tourism operators, bad accessibility weak and almost absent marketing activity, lack of well trained professionals, knowing foreign languages, absence of the medicinal water declaration many facilities are not accessible by disabled, dependence on (self) government sources, season only services. Threats: Stronger competitors, undifferentiated product range, excessive and unnecessary exploitation of the thermal wells incomes don‟t cover expenses, price/performance index deterioration, lack of investments, insufficient funding sources, unfavorable regulations, non sustainable business plans. 48
GEOTOUR & IRSE 2012 Fig. 3 Competitors of thermal tourism Source: Budai Z. (2002) THERMAL BATHS OF NORTHERN HUNGARY Northern Hungary have 16 thermal baths of which 7 are healing and a dry bath. It is a question that the thermal baths have significant effects on the regions‟ tourism. The answer is not easy because of the complexity of supply and demand in tourism but tourist traffic numbers clarifies the picture. In 2000 with the exception of Mezőcsát, Mátraderecske and Tab. 3 Change of number of bed nights (2000 =100%) 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Bogács 13% 27% 35% 26% 31% 27% 35% 29% 30% Mezőkövesd -1% -10% 27% 12% 71% 121% 114% 82% 173% Eger -9% -18% -31% -23% -2% -2% 1% 3% -9% Egerszalók 146% 207% 173% 1019 1394 1725 3941 3878 3979 % % % % % % Bükkszék 33% -15% -22% 3% -48% -54% -55% -45% -58% Gyöngyös -1% 23% 9% -14% -40% -34% -30% -34% -53% Hatvan -44% -29% -34% -34% -72% -29% -30% 3% 98% Kazincbarcika -19% -28% -26% 2% 1% -22% -7% 2% 12% Mátraderecske 47% -2% 280% 659% 250% 431% 53% Miskolc -14% -10% -4% -11% -17% -12% -9% -16% -27% Sárospatak 2% 21% 55% 22% 13% 59% 81% 87% 72% Szerencs -4% -2% -40% -47% -44% -40% -58% -66% -69% Tarnaméra -16% -24% 82% 86% 99% -66% -1% 17% -61% Tiszaújváros 7% 14% 44% 38% 16% 20% 20% 24% -3% Northern Hungary -3% -1% 1% -4% -2% 0% 1% 1% -6% Source: Author‟s own calculation based on CSO data 49
- Page 1 and 2: GEOTOUR’12 & IRSE’12 INTERNATIO
- Page 3 and 4: GEOTOUR & IRSE 2012 Geoparks, Geohe
- Page 5 and 6: CONDITIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF TH
- Page 8 and 9: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 10 and 11: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 12 and 13: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 14 and 15: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 16 and 17: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 18 and 19: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 20 and 21: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 22 and 23: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 24 and 25: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 26 and 27: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 28 and 29: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 30 and 31: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 32 and 33: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 34 and 35: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 36 and 37: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 38 and 39: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 40 and 41: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 42 and 43: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 44 and 45: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 46 and 47: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 48 and 49: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 52 and 53: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 54 and 55: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 56 and 57: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 58 and 59: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 60 and 61: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 62 and 63: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 64 and 65: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 66 and 67: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 68 and 69: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 70 and 71: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 72 and 73: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 74 and 75: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 76 and 77: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 78 and 79: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 80 and 81: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 82 and 83: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 84 and 85: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 86 and 87: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 88 and 89: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 90 and 91: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. October 20
- Page 92 and 93: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 THE S
- Page 94 and 95: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 Fig.
- Page 96 and 97: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 http:
- Page 98 and 99: Salgótarján, 04. - 06. 2012 Fig.
Salgótarján, 04. – 06. October 2012<br />
Tab. 2 SWOT analysis of Hungary‟s thermal tourism<br />
Strengths:<br />
Richness of mineral, thermal and<br />
medicinal water resources,<br />
historical baths, spas, spa culture,<br />
internationally-known sites, brands,<br />
world-class spas,<br />
reasonable prices,<br />
stable domestic demand,<br />
well-functioning quality monitoring,<br />
operational thematic clusters.<br />
Opportunities:<br />
Increasing proportion of elderly<br />
people,<br />
increasing demand for alternative<br />
tourism,<br />
the increase in effective demand in<br />
the<br />
case of the neighboring countries,<br />
increasing demand for<br />
specialized services,<br />
opening of European insurance<br />
companies,<br />
strengthening Internet-based<br />
communication,<br />
growing selection of quality hotels,<br />
foreign investments,<br />
rapid expansion of highway network,<br />
higher level management skills,<br />
strengthening the travel agencies,<br />
increasing demand for wellness<br />
services.<br />
Source: Own compilation<br />
Weaknesses:<br />
Many baths are in bad condition,<br />
variable quality of services,<br />
lack of self-government resources,<br />
lack of cooperation among tourism<br />
operators,<br />
bad accessibility<br />
weak and almost absent marketing<br />
activity,<br />
lack of well trained professionals,<br />
knowing foreign languages,<br />
absence of the medicinal water<br />
declaration<br />
many facilities are not accessible by<br />
disabled,<br />
dependence on (self) government<br />
sources,<br />
season only services.<br />
Threats:<br />
Stronger competitors,<br />
undifferentiated product range,<br />
excessive and unnecessary<br />
exploitation of the thermal wells<br />
incomes don‟t cover expenses,<br />
price/performance<br />
index<br />
deterioration,<br />
lack of investments,<br />
insufficient funding sources,<br />
unfavorable regulations, non<br />
sustainable<br />
business plans.<br />
48