GEOTOUR & IRSE 2012.pdf - Fakulta BERG - TUKE

Salgótarján, 04. – 06. October 2012
350
300
Changes of the nights spent in
collective tourist accommodation
(%, 2001-2010)
Tokaj
250
Hatvan
200
Abaúj-Hegyköz
150
Mezőkövesd
Bélapátfalva
Rétság
Sárospatak
Sátoraljaújhely
Füzesabony
100
Eger
Pétervására
Miskolc
Gyöngyös
Edelény
Salgótarján
Pásztó
Szécsény
50
Bátonyterenye Szerencs Bodrogköz
Balassagyarmat
Heves
Changes of the number of bed places
in collective tourist accommodation
Encs Ózd
Kazincbarcika
(%, 2001-2010)
0
0 50 100 150 200 250 300
Fig. 1 The positions of subregions with regard to the changes of the number of bed-places and the nights spent
(%, 2001-2010), Source: own compilation based on KSH TEIR data
14
12
10
8
6
4
2001
2005
2010
2
0
Fig. 2 Number of spa hotels (2001-2010) , Source: own compilation based on KSH TEIR data
In the North-Hungarian Region at the end of this period (2010) spa (medical) hotels operated just in
four subregions. This figure is really low, as medical hotels could significantly contribute to
developing tourism and the bednights spent in the region. In Hévíz and Sárvár Subregions the
construction of such hotels has increased the nights spent by non-residents and residents in
collective tourist accommodation threefold and in parallel the incomes coming from tourism have
also grown.
The indicator of the nights spent in collective tourist accommodation shows values over 3000 in
Eger, Mezőkövesd, Bélapátfalva, Tokaj and Pétervására Subregions in 2010 (it is the highest
category in Hungary) but Szikszó and the Bodrogköz Subregionsis belong to the lowest ones (the
value is between 31 and 68).
18