29.12.2014 Views

Download PDF - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

Download PDF - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

Download PDF - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fraud and Knowledge 209<br />

discharged, 48 allegedly by Berman, and without the consent <strong>of</strong> Eldee. 49<br />

Technically, the Chappell security interest was registered following the discharge<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Eldee security interest. Eldee wanted the Court to treat the Eldee security<br />

interest as not having been discharged, and therefore, as effective and relevant to<br />

the priority competition. The Court declined to do so, for the following reasons:<br />

a) This would undermine certainty; 50<br />

b) To import actual notice into the PPSA would actually run counter to<br />

express provisions <strong>of</strong> the PPSA; 51<br />

c) There is nothing beyond mere knowledge to suggest bad faith on the<br />

part <strong>of</strong> the Chappells; 52<br />

d) Eldee had a chance, pursuant to the provisions <strong>of</strong> the PPSA, 53 to remedy<br />

the discharge, within a given period <strong>of</strong> time. Having not done so, it was<br />

not entitle to a remedy from the Court. 54<br />

Therefore, the Court relied on the first and third principles referred to earlier<br />

to hold in favour <strong>of</strong> the Chappells. Furthermore, Justice Agrios essentially held<br />

that the application <strong>of</strong> the principles <strong>of</strong> equity would actually run counter to the<br />

PPSA, rather than supplementing its provisions. 55<br />

D. Furmanek v Community Futures Development Corp <strong>of</strong> Howe<br />

Sound 56<br />

In this case, the vendor <strong>of</strong> shares in a business, the plaintiff, Furmanek, gave<br />

the purchaser time to pay for the shares purchased. Therefore, a security interest<br />

in the purchaser’s assets was granted to Furmanek, who then made a proper<br />

registration <strong>of</strong> this security interest 57 in the Personal Property Registry. 58 In<br />

addition to the security interest given to the vendor, the purchaser borrowed part<br />

<strong>of</strong> the purchase price from Community Futures Development Corporation <strong>of</strong><br />

Howe Sound (“Development”). A security interest was granted to Development,<br />

which also registered its security interest 59 in the Personal Property Registry. 60 In<br />

48<br />

49<br />

50<br />

51<br />

52<br />

53<br />

54<br />

55<br />

56<br />

57<br />

58<br />

59<br />

60<br />

To “discharge” a security interest means to remove the financing statement from the Registry.<br />

Typically, this is done when the debtor’s obligation to the creditor is extinguished, or otherwise<br />

forgiven.<br />

Strathcona, supra note 10, at para 5.<br />

Ibid at para 11.<br />

Ibid at para 12.<br />

Ibid at para 13.<br />

See the PPSA, supra note 1, s 35(7)<br />

Strathcona, supra note 10, at para 14.<br />

Ibid at para 13.<br />

(1998) 162 DLR (4th) 501, [1998] BCJ No 1536 (BCCA) [Furmanek].<br />

Ibid at para 2, citing the chambers judge. All paragraph references are per DLR.<br />

Ibid.<br />

Ibid.<br />

PPSA, supra note 1, s 42.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!