29.12.2014 Views

Download PDF - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

Download PDF - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

Download PDF - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

114 MANITOBA LAW JOURNAL |VOLUME 35 NUMBER 1<br />

DNA model. In particular, concerns over the statistical validation <strong>of</strong> particular<br />

forensic techniques and over the trial presentation and interpretation <strong>of</strong> match<br />

statistics seem likely to come to the fore should the DNA model be applied more<br />

broadly.<br />

In the Manitoba context, DNA evidence and how it should be interpreted is<br />

a current subject due to the high pr<strong>of</strong>ile trial <strong>of</strong> Mark Edward Grant for the 1984<br />

murder <strong>of</strong> Candace Derksen. 9 Questions about the interpretation <strong>of</strong> DNA, other<br />

forms <strong>of</strong> forensic evidence, and the jury charge have formed the basis <strong>of</strong> his<br />

appeal <strong>of</strong> his conviction. 10 While DNA evidence has largely become routine in<br />

Canadian courts, R v Grant demonstrates how concerns over the use <strong>of</strong> relatively<br />

marginal DNA samples allow the defence to unpack the technique itself and<br />

questions about the limits <strong>of</strong> technology, expertise, and interpretation come to<br />

the fore. 11 While this paper will argue that DNA is likely becoming the model that<br />

all other forensic techniques will have to follow, it is important to keep in mind<br />

that it, like all other forensic techniques, remains only circumstantial evidence<br />

that must be interpreted by the fact-finder in the context <strong>of</strong> a trial.<br />

The following paper will start by describing the recommendations made by<br />

the National Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences Committee and how, if implemented, these<br />

recommendations would result in a change in the scientific approach or paradigm<br />

used by forensic science generally. The second section <strong>of</strong> the paper will introduce<br />

DNA evidence and the scientific controversies that were current during the<br />

period that Canadian courts were first evaluating its admissibility. The third will<br />

describe some <strong>of</strong> the early Canadian DNA jurisprudence to identify some <strong>of</strong> the<br />

difficulties Canadian courts had when confronting these controversies. The<br />

concluding section will discuss how this experience with DNA could help identify<br />

potential difficulties with post-NAS Report forensic science.<br />

III.<br />

THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCE’S REPORT ON FORENSICS<br />

This section will show how the NAS report argues for major changes in the<br />

way forensic science is practiced and how the Report proposes a series <strong>of</strong><br />

recommendations aimed towards specific forms <strong>of</strong> forensics. It will argue that the<br />

factor that links these recommendations is the use <strong>of</strong> DNA as a model and that,<br />

taken together, the NAS recommendations argue for making all forensic science<br />

9<br />

10<br />

11<br />

James Turner, “Schoolgirl trial awash in DNA testimony”, online: CBC News .<br />

R v Grant, Notice <strong>of</strong> Application <strong>of</strong> Leave to Appeal and Notice <strong>of</strong> Appeal.<br />

“Faulty DNA testing attacked at murder trial”, online: CBC News<br />

,<br />

“DNA doubted at murder trial”, online: CBC News .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!