29.12.2014 Views

Download PDF - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

Download PDF - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

Download PDF - Robson Hall Faculty of Law

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The National Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences, Canadian<br />

DNA Jurisprudence and Changing Forensic<br />

Practice<br />

S O R E N F R E D E R I K S E N *<br />

I.<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

I<br />

n 2009, the National Research Council <strong>of</strong> the National Academies released a<br />

report entitled Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States. Empowered by<br />

Congress, the Forensic Science Committee was explicitly tasked with<br />

evaluating the current status <strong>of</strong> forensic evidence and making recommendations<br />

for the future development <strong>of</strong> the field <strong>of</strong> forensics. Congress dictated that the<br />

model for this process was to be the one that was used in the development <strong>of</strong> two<br />

previous reports on the evaluation <strong>of</strong> forensic DNA evidence. The<br />

recommendations in the final report <strong>of</strong> the Forensic Science Committee reflect<br />

this, using forensic DNA as a model for many <strong>of</strong> its recommendations in the area<br />

<strong>of</strong> traditional forensics.<br />

This paper examines how the translation <strong>of</strong> DNA-based forensic science<br />

methodology to the traditional forensic sciences, if implemented, will affect the<br />

kind <strong>of</strong> evidence presented in criminal courts and the way that evidence is<br />

presented. It argues that this would represent a change in the scientific paradigm<br />

that underlies forensic testimony. Further, this paper examines how this change in<br />

the scientific and methodological paradigm for forensic evidence proved difficult<br />

for Canadian courts when DNA evidence was first introduced, suggesting<br />

potential difficulties in the future as Canadian courts try to adapt to new ways <strong>of</strong><br />

thinking about forensic evidence.<br />

II.<br />

THE FORENSIC SCIENCE COMMITTEE<br />

In November 2005, Congress tasked the National Academy <strong>of</strong> Sciences<br />

(NAS) with conducting a study to evaluate the status <strong>of</strong> forensic science in the<br />

United States, recognizing that there was a need for improvement in this area. 1<br />

*<br />

1<br />

Assistant Pr<strong>of</strong>essor, School <strong>of</strong> Public Policy and Administration, York University.<br />

US, National Research Council: Committee on identifying the needs <strong>of</strong> the forensic science<br />

community, Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States (Washington DC: National

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!