OFFERING MEMORANDUM Global Offering of up to ... - Nordex
OFFERING MEMORANDUM Global Offering of up to ... - Nordex
OFFERING MEMORANDUM Global Offering of up to ... - Nordex
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S CERTIFICATE OF REVIEW<br />
The operations <strong>of</strong> the Taifun (now <strong>Nordex</strong>) Gro<strong>up</strong> were in the past conducted partly within legally<br />
independent entities, partly in unincorporated divisions <strong>of</strong> certain gro<strong>up</strong> companies <strong>of</strong> Borsig Energy<br />
GmbH, Oberhausen, and included in the gro<strong>up</strong> accounts <strong>of</strong> BDAG Balcke-Dürr AG, Ratingen. Taifun AG<br />
(<strong>to</strong>day’s <strong>Nordex</strong> AG) prepared pro forma consolidated interim statements for the 3-month period ended<br />
December 31, 2000 (‘‘First Quarter for Fiscal Year 2000/2001’’), which include the entities now owned by<br />
<strong>Nordex</strong> AG (formerly Taifun AG). The accounting and other transactions are explained in greater detail<br />
in the notes <strong>to</strong> the pro forma consolidated interim statements <strong>of</strong> Taifun AG.<br />
In the quarter under review, the pro forma consolidated interim statements <strong>of</strong> Taifun AG as <strong>of</strong><br />
December 31, 2000, included apart from <strong>Nordex</strong> Au<strong>to</strong>mation GmbH, Oberhausen (formerly Babcock<br />
Prozessau<strong>to</strong>mation GmbH, Wind Energy division), also NPV Planung und Vertrieb GmbH, Bad Essen<br />
(formerly <strong>Nordex</strong> Planungs- und Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH), Südwind Energy GmbH, Oberhausen<br />
(formerly Südwind Borsig Energy GmbH), <strong>Nordex</strong> Ro<strong>to</strong>r GmbH, Ros<strong>to</strong>ck (formerly Borsig Ro<strong>to</strong>rtechnik<br />
GmbH), and <strong>Nordex</strong> Energy GmbH, Rerik (formerly <strong>Nordex</strong> GmbH).<br />
Previously, the operations <strong>of</strong> Babcock Prozessau<strong>to</strong>mation GmbH, Oberhausen (‘‘BPA’’), comprised the<br />
two divisions (business segments) <strong>of</strong> Power Plants and Wind Energy. As <strong>of</strong> Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 1, 2000, Power<br />
Plants was spun <strong>of</strong>f and BPA with the remaining Wind Energy division contributed as <strong>of</strong> December 14,<br />
2000 (date <strong>of</strong> Commercial Register entry) <strong>to</strong> Taifun AG, a company organized on August 25, 2000.<br />
Babcock Prozessau<strong>to</strong>mation GmbH with its remaining, Wind Energy, division was renamed <strong>Nordex</strong><br />
Au<strong>to</strong>mation GmbH, Oberhausen, as <strong>of</strong> November 20, 2000.<br />
Subsidiaries <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nordex</strong> Energy GmbH, Rerik, were not included in the consolidation gro<strong>up</strong> since their<br />
impact on the Taifun Gro<strong>up</strong>’s net assets, financial position and results <strong>of</strong> operations was insignificant.<br />
Another investee <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nordex</strong> Energy GmbH, Rerik, was stated at amortized cost according <strong>to</strong> IAS as any<br />
influence on the investee’s business and financial policies could be safely ruled out.<br />
The interim (quarterly) accounts <strong>of</strong> companies included in the pro forma consolidated interim<br />
statements as <strong>of</strong> December 31, 2000, were prepared in accordance with the accounting regulations <strong>of</strong><br />
the German Commercial Code. In line with our engagement, we reviewed the interim accounts <strong>of</strong> such<br />
consolidated subsidiaries for the 3-month period ended December 31, 2000. Our review included<br />
assessing such quarterly accounts by obtaining information and audit evidence through inquiries and<br />
analytical audit procedures. Our review did not cover the contents <strong>of</strong> the consolidated subsidiaries’<br />
accounting systems. For preparing the pro forma consolidated interim statements, the separate<br />
quarterly accounts for the 3-month period ended December 31, 2000, were substantially restated <strong>to</strong><br />
conform with IAS in accordance with gro<strong>up</strong>wide uniform accounting principles. The companies were<br />
consolidated in the pro forma consolidated interim statements as <strong>of</strong> December 31, 2000, in accordance<br />
with IASC rules mainly as follows and as described in greater detail in the notes there<strong>to</strong>:<br />
The IAS require that initial capital consolidation be made as <strong>of</strong> the date <strong>of</strong> acquisition, which is defined<br />
as the date at which control over net assets and business operations <strong>of</strong> the companies included in the<br />
consolidation gro<strong>up</strong> actually passes <strong>to</strong> Taifun AG (now <strong>Nordex</strong> AG) as transferee. These prerequisites<br />
were met in early 2001 only. Since Taifun AG was required <strong>to</strong> account for the shares in said subsidiaries<br />
already as <strong>of</strong> December 31, 2000, capital consolidation was effected pro forma and pro forma goodwill<br />
disclosed in order <strong>to</strong> present an as true as possible view <strong>of</strong> the net assets at December 31, 2000. For the<br />
time being, potential hidden reserves and burdens did not enter in<strong>to</strong> consideration. Since, when the<br />
individual subsidiaries were transferred and contributed <strong>to</strong> Taifun AG, this nonmonetary transaction<br />
constituted merely a restructuring process within the Babcock Borsig Gro<strong>up</strong>, the investment book<br />
values carried in Taifun AG’s balance sheet underlay pro forma capital consolidation. No amortization,<br />
primarily <strong>of</strong> a potential goodwill, due <strong>to</strong> the pro forma capital consolidation was charged <strong>to</strong> income for<br />
reasons <strong>of</strong> comparability with the (combined) pro forma consolidated financial statements. The<br />
Company is presently testing the components <strong>of</strong> the resultant difference (net equity under cost) for<br />
future accounting treatment. Provided that no different allocation or <strong>of</strong>fset in comparison with the<br />
F-61