09.11.2012 Views

OFFERING MEMORANDUM Global Offering of up to ... - Nordex

OFFERING MEMORANDUM Global Offering of up to ... - Nordex

OFFERING MEMORANDUM Global Offering of up to ... - Nordex

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S CERTIFICATE OF REVIEW<br />

The operations <strong>of</strong> the Taifun (now <strong>Nordex</strong>) Gro<strong>up</strong> were in the past conducted partly within legally<br />

independent entities, partly in unincorporated divisions <strong>of</strong> certain gro<strong>up</strong> companies <strong>of</strong> Borsig Energy<br />

GmbH, Oberhausen, and included in the gro<strong>up</strong> accounts <strong>of</strong> BDAG Balcke-Dürr AG, Ratingen. Taifun AG<br />

(<strong>to</strong>day’s <strong>Nordex</strong> AG) prepared pro forma consolidated interim statements for the 3-month period ended<br />

December 31, 2000 (‘‘First Quarter for Fiscal Year 2000/2001’’), which include the entities now owned by<br />

<strong>Nordex</strong> AG (formerly Taifun AG). The accounting and other transactions are explained in greater detail<br />

in the notes <strong>to</strong> the pro forma consolidated interim statements <strong>of</strong> Taifun AG.<br />

In the quarter under review, the pro forma consolidated interim statements <strong>of</strong> Taifun AG as <strong>of</strong><br />

December 31, 2000, included apart from <strong>Nordex</strong> Au<strong>to</strong>mation GmbH, Oberhausen (formerly Babcock<br />

Prozessau<strong>to</strong>mation GmbH, Wind Energy division), also NPV Planung und Vertrieb GmbH, Bad Essen<br />

(formerly <strong>Nordex</strong> Planungs- und Vertriebsgesellschaft mbH), Südwind Energy GmbH, Oberhausen<br />

(formerly Südwind Borsig Energy GmbH), <strong>Nordex</strong> Ro<strong>to</strong>r GmbH, Ros<strong>to</strong>ck (formerly Borsig Ro<strong>to</strong>rtechnik<br />

GmbH), and <strong>Nordex</strong> Energy GmbH, Rerik (formerly <strong>Nordex</strong> GmbH).<br />

Previously, the operations <strong>of</strong> Babcock Prozessau<strong>to</strong>mation GmbH, Oberhausen (‘‘BPA’’), comprised the<br />

two divisions (business segments) <strong>of</strong> Power Plants and Wind Energy. As <strong>of</strong> Oc<strong>to</strong>ber 1, 2000, Power<br />

Plants was spun <strong>of</strong>f and BPA with the remaining Wind Energy division contributed as <strong>of</strong> December 14,<br />

2000 (date <strong>of</strong> Commercial Register entry) <strong>to</strong> Taifun AG, a company organized on August 25, 2000.<br />

Babcock Prozessau<strong>to</strong>mation GmbH with its remaining, Wind Energy, division was renamed <strong>Nordex</strong><br />

Au<strong>to</strong>mation GmbH, Oberhausen, as <strong>of</strong> November 20, 2000.<br />

Subsidiaries <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nordex</strong> Energy GmbH, Rerik, were not included in the consolidation gro<strong>up</strong> since their<br />

impact on the Taifun Gro<strong>up</strong>’s net assets, financial position and results <strong>of</strong> operations was insignificant.<br />

Another investee <strong>of</strong> <strong>Nordex</strong> Energy GmbH, Rerik, was stated at amortized cost according <strong>to</strong> IAS as any<br />

influence on the investee’s business and financial policies could be safely ruled out.<br />

The interim (quarterly) accounts <strong>of</strong> companies included in the pro forma consolidated interim<br />

statements as <strong>of</strong> December 31, 2000, were prepared in accordance with the accounting regulations <strong>of</strong><br />

the German Commercial Code. In line with our engagement, we reviewed the interim accounts <strong>of</strong> such<br />

consolidated subsidiaries for the 3-month period ended December 31, 2000. Our review included<br />

assessing such quarterly accounts by obtaining information and audit evidence through inquiries and<br />

analytical audit procedures. Our review did not cover the contents <strong>of</strong> the consolidated subsidiaries’<br />

accounting systems. For preparing the pro forma consolidated interim statements, the separate<br />

quarterly accounts for the 3-month period ended December 31, 2000, were substantially restated <strong>to</strong><br />

conform with IAS in accordance with gro<strong>up</strong>wide uniform accounting principles. The companies were<br />

consolidated in the pro forma consolidated interim statements as <strong>of</strong> December 31, 2000, in accordance<br />

with IASC rules mainly as follows and as described in greater detail in the notes there<strong>to</strong>:<br />

The IAS require that initial capital consolidation be made as <strong>of</strong> the date <strong>of</strong> acquisition, which is defined<br />

as the date at which control over net assets and business operations <strong>of</strong> the companies included in the<br />

consolidation gro<strong>up</strong> actually passes <strong>to</strong> Taifun AG (now <strong>Nordex</strong> AG) as transferee. These prerequisites<br />

were met in early 2001 only. Since Taifun AG was required <strong>to</strong> account for the shares in said subsidiaries<br />

already as <strong>of</strong> December 31, 2000, capital consolidation was effected pro forma and pro forma goodwill<br />

disclosed in order <strong>to</strong> present an as true as possible view <strong>of</strong> the net assets at December 31, 2000. For the<br />

time being, potential hidden reserves and burdens did not enter in<strong>to</strong> consideration. Since, when the<br />

individual subsidiaries were transferred and contributed <strong>to</strong> Taifun AG, this nonmonetary transaction<br />

constituted merely a restructuring process within the Babcock Borsig Gro<strong>up</strong>, the investment book<br />

values carried in Taifun AG’s balance sheet underlay pro forma capital consolidation. No amortization,<br />

primarily <strong>of</strong> a potential goodwill, due <strong>to</strong> the pro forma capital consolidation was charged <strong>to</strong> income for<br />

reasons <strong>of</strong> comparability with the (combined) pro forma consolidated financial statements. The<br />

Company is presently testing the components <strong>of</strong> the resultant difference (net equity under cost) for<br />

future accounting treatment. Provided that no different allocation or <strong>of</strong>fset in comparison with the<br />

F-61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!