09.11.2012 Views

OFFERING MEMORANDUM Global Offering of up to ... - Nordex

OFFERING MEMORANDUM Global Offering of up to ... - Nordex

OFFERING MEMORANDUM Global Offering of up to ... - Nordex

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

(3) Consolidation procedures<br />

According <strong>to</strong> IAS 27 and 22, initial capital consolidation is governed by the date <strong>of</strong> acquisition, which,<br />

pursuant <strong>to</strong> IAS 22.20, is the date at which control <strong>of</strong> the net assets and operations <strong>of</strong> consolidatable<br />

subsidiaries is effectively transferred <strong>to</strong> Taifun AG as acquirer and transferee.<br />

Since <strong>to</strong>day’s <strong>Nordex</strong> AG (formerly Taifun AG) will not start <strong>up</strong> its operations before early 2001 and its<br />

subsidiaries will until then remain fully integrated at the organizational level with Borsig Energy GmbH<br />

and the BDAG Balcke-Dürr AG Gro<strong>up</strong>, no effective gro<strong>up</strong> structure, and hence no control <strong>of</strong> the<br />

contributed subsidiaries, existed in 2000 despite the agreements consummated in November/December<br />

2000.<br />

In the pro forma consolidated interim statements, capital consolidation was effected pro forma<br />

(i) <strong>to</strong> ensure that the equity as <strong>of</strong> December 31, 2000, is best comparable <strong>to</strong> that at September 30, 2000,<br />

and (ii) lest the gro<strong>up</strong>’s net assets should be overstated as <strong>of</strong> December 31, 2000. For such pro forma<br />

capital consolidation, the equity interests (financial assets) <strong>of</strong>, acquired with legal effect as <strong>of</strong> 12-14-<br />

2000 by, Taifun AG in the subsidiaries included in the pro forma consolidation gro<strong>up</strong> were <strong>of</strong>fset<br />

against such subsidiaries’ IAS-based equity as <strong>of</strong> January 1, 2001, the resulting difference being shown<br />

as pro forma goodwill, which was thus determinable on a best-estimate basis. Since, when the<br />

individual subsidiaries were transferred and contributed <strong>to</strong> Taifun AG, this nonmonetary transaction<br />

constituted merely a restructuring process within the Babcock Borsig Gro<strong>up</strong>, the investment book<br />

values carried in Taifun AG’s balance sheet underlay not only pro forma capital consolidation but also<br />

the determination <strong>of</strong> pro forma goodwill. No goodwill amortization was charged since the gro<strong>up</strong><br />

structure was not created until early 2001. On this basis and assuming a 15-year period <strong>of</strong> benefit, the<br />

anticipated annual goodwill amortization will amount <strong>to</strong> kE1,336.5.<br />

In consolidation, all receivables and payables among consolidated subsidiaries were mutually <strong>of</strong>fset,<br />

without producing any foreign exchange gains or losses.<br />

In First Quarter for Fiscal Year 2000/2001, no intercompany pr<strong>of</strong>its were made, whether within<br />

inven<strong>to</strong>ries or in the form <strong>of</strong> prorated pr<strong>of</strong>its realized according <strong>to</strong> the percentage-<strong>of</strong>-completion<br />

method. The accounting for capital leases according <strong>to</strong> IAS 17 (from the gro<strong>up</strong>’s vantage point) resulted<br />

in First Quarter for Fiscal Year 2000/2001 and First Quarter for Fiscal Year 1999/2000 each in income <strong>of</strong><br />

kE61.9.<br />

Moreover, all expenses and income originating from intragro<strong>up</strong> transfers <strong>of</strong> goods/services and from<br />

intercompany allocations and intragro<strong>up</strong> P&L transfers were all mutually netted in consolidation, cf.<br />

Note (2).<br />

In addition, the external gro<strong>up</strong> fees apportioned and charged in the quarters under review were in<br />

consolidation eliminated from quarterly net income and replaced by imputed future personnel and<br />

administrative expenses <strong>of</strong> <strong>to</strong>day’s <strong>Nordex</strong> AG, duly accounting for the imputed tax effects, cf. Note (1).<br />

(4) General accounting and valuation details<br />

(4.1) Classification<br />

The classification rules <strong>of</strong> Art. 266 HGB (after adjustment <strong>to</strong> specific IAS disclosure requirements) were<br />

applied for preparing the IAS-based balance sheet. The income statement according <strong>to</strong> IAS is presented<br />

in the full-cost format in analogy <strong>to</strong> the classification provisions <strong>of</strong> Art. 275(2) HGB. Major deviations<br />

from the HGB-oriented disclosure format are, in particular, attributable <strong>to</strong> the derivation from IASbased<br />

quarterly net income <strong>of</strong> pro forma net earnings, cf. Note (1).<br />

(4.2) Accounting and valuation methods<br />

The accounting, valuation and currency translation methods underlying the (combined) pro forma<br />

consolidated statements 1997/98, 1998/99 and 1999/2000 were consistently applied when preparing<br />

the pro forma consolidated interim statements for the quarter ended December 31, 2000.<br />

F-49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!